Fannie and Freddie Failure Forever<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/4205349:6250618396:m:1:147140772:F3114DCC3BB65BF823A9005C70B72C19> Yesterday, Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) told reporters<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/4205350:6250618396:m:1:147140772:F3114DCC3BB65BF823A9005C70B72C19>about his financial regulation bill, "We've ended the 'too big to fail' debate. So no longer do I expect any argument to be made that this bill exposes the American taxpayer." Really. Someone might want to tell Sen. Dodd that in other news yesterday, Freddie Mac announced<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/4205351:6250618396:m:1:147140772:F3114DCC3BB65BF823A9005C70B72C19>that it lost another $6.7 billion in the first quarter of 2010 and therefore needed another $10.6 billion in cash from U.S. taxpayers. Since formally nationalizing Freddie in 2008, the federal government has already spent $50.7 billion bringing the Freddie bailout total to $61.3 billion so far. Combined with Fannie Mae's raid on the Treasury, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the American people will spend $389 billion bailing out the two Government Sponsored Entities by 2019. So much for American taxpayers no longer being exposed to "too big to fail."
In fact, nothing in the Dodd bill does anything to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. This despite the fact that Fannie and Freddie were key components<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/4205352:6250618396:m:1:147140772:F3114DCC3BB65BF823A9005C70B72C19>in causing the very financial crises Dodd claims his bill will forever prevent. Fannie and Freddie were both created for the specific purpose of making it easier for Americans to buy more expensive housing. Starting in 1993<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/4205353:6250618396:m:1:147140772:F3114DCC3BB65BF823A9005C70B72C19>, political forces pushed Fannie and Freddie to loosen their once strict loan purchasing requirements. By 1996, regulations required that 40% of all Fannie and Freddie-bought loans<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/4205353:6250618396:m:1:147140772:F3114DCC3BB65BF823A9005C70B72C19>must come from individuals with below median incomes. In 1995, Fannie and Freddie began buying subprime securities<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/4205354:6250618396:m:1:147140772:F3114DCC3BB65BF823A9005C70B72C19>originally bought and bundled by private firms. One of these firms was Countrywide Financial who, thanks to their status as Fannie Mae's biggest customer<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/4205355:6250618396:m:1:147140772:F3114DCC3BB65BF823A9005C70B72C19>, delivered investors a 23,000% return between 1985 and 2003.<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/4205356:6250618396:m:1:147140772:F3114DCC3BB65BF823A9005C70B72C19>By 2004, Fannie and Freddie were purchasing $175 billion worth of subprime securities per year from Countrywide and their brethren... a 44% share of the entire market<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/4205354:6250618396:m:1:147140772:F3114DCC3BB65BF823A9005C70B72C19>. There are other factors that helped contribute to the 2008 financial crisis<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/4205352:6250618396:m:1:147140772:F3114DCC3BB65BF823A9005C70B72C19>, but Fannie and Freddie's use of their "too big to fail" status to create and grow the subprime security market was essential. But Sen. Dodd, who received V.I.P. treatment from Countrywide CEO Angelo Mozilo<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/4205357:6250618396:m:1:147140772:F3114DCC3BB65BF823A9005C70B72C19>, never saw any problem with Fannie and Freddie. On July 13, 2008, Senator Dodd said on national television<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/4205354:6250618396:m:1:147140772:F3114DCC3BB65BF823A9005C70B72C19>, "To suggest somehow that [Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac] are in trouble is simply not accurate." Less than two months later the bailouts of Fannie and Freddie began. Keep these facts in mind when Dodd says his bill solves the "too big to fail" problem. The problems with the Dodd bill go beyond its failure to let Fannie and Freddie wither into extinction<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/4205358:6250618396:m:1:147140772:F3114DCC3BB65BF823A9005C70B72C19>. While Dodd has agreed to get rid of the $50 billion bailout fund, the underlying bailout authority still remains. Now taxpayers are expected to front the government money while firms are liquidated. But the irresponsible creditors who let those firms borrow money irresponsibly would still be eligible for taxpayer bailouts. According to The Washington Post<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/4205359:6250618396:m:1:147140772:F3114DCC3BB65BF823A9005C70B72C19>, "a failing firm would be forced to pay back the government any money they received above what they would have gotten under a bankruptcy proceeding." But how does the government know what creditors would have got if the company went into bankruptcy? Why not just strengthen the existing bankruptcy system<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/4205360:6250618396:m:1:147140772:F3114DCC3BB65BF823A9005C70B72C19>and actually allow these too big to fail firms to, ya know, fail? But Dodd and the Obama administration would never allow that. It would defeat the whole purpose this financial regulation bill, which is to transfer as much power to the federal government as possible. Never mind that these are the same government regulators who failed to see the last crisis coming. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
