May 10, 2010
Why the Ground Zero Mosque Must Be Stopped

*By* *Madeline Brooks* <http://www.americanthinker.com/madeline_brooks/>

Planting a mosque just two blocks from where Muslims murdered Americans on
9/11 in the name of Islam is a huge slap in the face. Why shouldn't Muslims
be sensitive enough to realize that a huge mosque planted right near the
horrific wound to the U.S. created at Ground Zero by Muslims is outrageous
to us? *They *claim a right to be insulted by cartoons mocking their
prophet, even to the point of beheading people.



The Imam of the *Ground Zero Insult*, Faisal Abdul Rauf, is not the nice guy
he likes to hold himself out to be. At his Friday afternoon
*khutbah*services and in his book
*What's Right With Islam* Rauf states that he wants the mosque to be a place
where inter-faith understanding is fostered. His sonorous voice is smooth
and almost hypnotic. His writing style appears to be rational and
unthreatening.

However, this does not jibe with the aspects of him that are downright
hostile and frightening.



During a recent Friday sermon, this writer did due diligence as a mosque
monitor and heard Rauf deny that Muslims perpetrated 9/11. In an interview
with CNN shortly after 9/11, Rauf said, "U.S. policies were an accessory to
the crime that happened. We [the U.S.] have been an accessory to a lot of
innocent lives dying in the world. Osama bin Laden was made in the USA."
Elsewhere, Rauf has stated that terrorism will end only when the West
acknowledges the harm it has done to Muslims. And that it was Christians who
started mass attacks on civilians.



Rauf has numerous ties to CAIR, an unindicted co-conspirator in the
Department of Justice funding case brought against Hamas, an openly
terrorist organization. CAIR is also the initiator of numerous cases
designed to intimidate non-Muslims from criticizing aggressive Muslim
behavior, and to use our own legal and democratic processes to undermine and
dominate America, forcing it to become Islamic.



Rauf calls himself a Sufi, evoking among non-Muslims a "peace and love"
image. But that's not the whole picture. Sufism has many sides to it,
including the Koranic injunction to spread Islam one way or another, and it
has a rich history of waging war, too. Could it be that one of the
frequently used tools of war, lying to the enemy, explains the contradiction
between Rauf's image as reconciler of religions and his sympathies and
associations with terrorists?



A previous Rauf project, Muslim Leaders of Tomorrow, clearly shows on its
website that it is headed and funded by individuals from Saudi Arabia, the
country that spawned fifteen of the nineteen jihad jockeys who rode the 9/11
planes of destruction. The funding for the mosque at Ground Zero is much
murkier so far. All that has been publicly disclosed is that the support
comes from unidentified sources in Saudi Arabia and Muslim-ruled Malaysia.
Rauf reportedly says he* *paid $4.85 million for the property -- in cash.
Where exactly did this money come from? Was it Wahhabist-supporting Saudi
sources, which have already funded many other mosques in New York City?



The mosque is called Cordoba House. Muslims like to refer to Spain and
especially the city of Cordoba as a place where their rule reached a
glorious peak. Contrary to the myth of a Golden Age of equality during the
Muslim occupation of Spain (and in particular in Cordoba), Spain and Cordoba
were* *places where Christians and Jews *suffered *as social inferiors under
Islamic oppression. Equal civil rights never existed for non-Muslims under
Sharia, or Islamic law. Rauf even admits as much when he writes, "Jews and
Christians living under Muslim rule simply had to pay a tax to finance their
protection by their Muslim overlords." This is not equality! Americans do
not demand a special tax to protect Muslims from ourselves. That would be
extortion, not "protection."



Through another organization Rauf started called the Cordoba Initiative, he
created the "Sharia Index." This will measure how closely countries follow
Sharia, or Islamic law. While Sharia *can* cover such relatively innocuous
aspects of Muslim life as religious weddings (hopefully not to
twelve-year-old girls), it also demands that *all *Muslim life be governed
by laws derived from the Koran, without the intervention of civic
institutions, such as democracy. And the Koran dictates that *everyone*,* *even
non-Muslims,* *must ultimately live under Sharia. Do you understand how that
is in direct conflict with our Constitution and other aspects of our secular
society?



Rauf gets even trickier here. He states in *What's Right With Islam *that a
society that follows natural law, such as America, is already practicing
Sharia. However, he does not note that his peculiar definition of Sharia
acceptance is shared by just about no other Imam. So what prevents him from
adjusting his singular idea of Sharia back to the norm of forced
conversions, murdering non-Muslims and apostates, amputations of thieves'
hands, stoning of adulterous women, execution of homosexuals, etc.?
Throughout his writing, Rauf floats an image of a harmonious, pleasant Islam
-- nice to everybody. But this is totally disconnected from Islam's actual
history of bloody conquest, enslavement, and humiliation of other people --
which he never acknowledges.



Still another unsettling part of Rauf's problem mosque is why the city has
given the building a pass. Records for the Department of Buildings have
shown numerous complaints for illegal construction and no access, yet the
issues were listed as "resolved."



Community Board One's financial district committee needs to reconsider its
endorsement of this mosque. The prestigious American groups that are
reportedly also financing the mosque, The Ford Foundation and The
Rockefeller Brothers Fund, need to think again about what they are getting
into. The Department of Buildings needs to reassess its action. The Mayor's
Office of Immigrant Affairs, which supports the project (Why? What has a
religious building got to do with immigration?) needs to reevaluate its
approval.



Mayor Bloomberg himself needs to withdraw his support for this mosque,
especially in light of the recent Times Square car bomb attempt. If not, he
will be helping to provide a handy meeting place for future terrorists,
those who understand Imam Rauf's real message: Speak sweetly, appear to be a
well-adjusted member of American society, and plan the destruction of
America, either with bombs or "peaceful" undermining.


*Madeline Brooks is an NYC resident and writer.** *


*Page Printed from:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/05/why_the_ground_zero_mosque_mus_1.html
* at May 10, 2010 - 08:27:25 AM CDT

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to