so, M. Johnson
are you an American?
or are you an illegal immigrant?
or are you a libtard moonbat?
On May 8, 8:09 am, "M. Johnson" <[email protected]> wrote:
How Immigration Crackdowns BackfireThe trouble with Arizona's draconian
new lawSteve Chapman| April 22, 2010
Arizona legislators are fed up with being terrorized by illegal
immigrants, and they have passed a law to get tough. Under the measure,
passed this week and sent to the governor, police would have to stop and
question anyone they suspect of being in this country without legal
authorization.
The bill passed after the fatal shooting of Robert Krentz, a 58-year-old
rancher whose killer apparently entered illegally from Mexico. Pinal County
Sheriff Paul Babeu says police are also under siege: "We've had numerous
officers that have been killed by illegal immigrants in Arizona."
Even Sen. John McCain, once a supporter of immigration reform, has called
for the immediate placement of 3,000 National Guard soldiers along the
border.
It's no surprise that Arizonans resent the recent influx of unauthorized
foreigners, some of them criminals. But there is less here than meets the
eye.
The state has an estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants. But contrary to
myth, they have not brought an epidemic of murder and mayhem with them.
Surprise of surprises, the state has gotten safer.
Over the last decade, the violent crime rate has dropped by 19 percent,
while property crime is down by 20 percent. Crime has also declined in the
rest of the country, but not as fast as in Arizona.
Babeu's claim about police killings came as news to me. When I called his
office to get a list of victims, I learned there has been only one since the
beginning of 2008deeply regrettable, but not exactly a trend.
Truth is, illegal immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than native
Americans. Most come here to work, and in their desire to stay, they are
generally afraid to do anything that might draw the attention of armed
people wearing badges.
El Paso, Texas, is next door to the exceptionally violent Ciudad Juarez,
Mexico, and easily accessible to illegal entry. Yet it is one of the safest
cities in the United States.
In 2007, scholars Ruben Rumbaut and Walter Ewing investigated the issue
for the Immigration Policy Center and concluded that "if immigrants suddenly
disappeared and the country became immigrant-free (and illegal-immigrant
free), crime rates would likelyincrease."
That's not to say Arizonans don't have a right to be upset when Mexicans
trespass across private land on a regular basis. But you could solve that
problem by making it easier for them to immigrate legally.
It's also worth remembering that this used to be a rare phenomenon. What
made it common was not a new avalanche of people coming to the United States
without permission. It was a federal offensive to intercept them in major
border cities where they used to arrive.
"Closing the old entry points diverted them into places which didn't have
many undocumented immigrants before," Princeton University sociologist
Douglas Massey told me. Instead of sneaking into San Diego or El Paso, they
are prone to entering somewhere elseoften in the Arizona desert, where the
chance of being caught is lower.
Turning the border into a 2,000-mile replica of the Berlin Wall may sound
like a simple cure for the problem. But besides being hugely expensive, it
would have effects the advocates would not relish.
How so? Massey says the number of people coming illegally has not risen
appreciably in the last couple of decades. But the number staying has
climbed, because anyone who leaves faces a harder task returning.
Had the government not cracked down at the border, he says, "the
undocumented population would be half what it is now." A fence intended to
keep illegal immigrants out is serving beautifully to keep them in.
Assigning local police to enforce federal immigration laws would also
have unhealthy side effects. The Major Cities Chiefs Association,
representing 56 police departments, says it hinders law enforcement by
deterring members of immigrant communities from cooperating with cops.
Last year, Police Chief George Gascon of Mesa, Ariz., (now chief in San
Francisco) told a congressional committee that in some cases, this approach
"is setting the police profession back to the 1950s and '60s, when police
officers were sometimes viewed in minority communities as the enemy."
If there is anything we've learned about getting tough on illegal
immigration, it's that it rarely works as intended. Like punching a wall, it
may feel good for a moment, but it hurts a lot longer.
http://reason.com/archives/2010/04/22/how-immigration-crackdowns-bac
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
