*"When something becomes illegal, consumer demand does not vanish."

**The Underground Economy in One Page
*Wednesday, May 26, 2010
by Danny G. LeRoy <http://mises.org/articles.aspx?AuthorId=1489>

What is the *underground economy*?


   1. It is not something subterranean. It is neither a physical structure
   nor a place. The pejorative term "underground economy" is used to describe
   the activities of buying and selling that occur beyond the purview of
   authorities. Typically the goods or services that are exchanged include,
   among others, drugs, sex, electronics, software, movies, music, and
   building-construction services.
   2. Markets are processes involving the interplay of buyers and sellers.
   When the role of government is restricted to protecting persons and private
   property against aggression and theft, market processes transpire without
   impediment. Consumption opportunities are maximized as entrepreneurs deploy
   resources to produce goods and services in view of profitably satisfying the
   myriad wants of consumers.
   3. When governments interfere with market processes by way of taxes,
   regulations, and prohibitions, they go beyond protecting individuals and
   private property from aggression and theft. Government-granted monopoly
   privilege in the form of compulsory producer cartels or patents do not
   protect property rights; they invade them. The aim of government
   interventionism is to control the productive and consumptive behavior of
   individuals. In other words, central authorities want to influence what you
   do with your body and the things that you own, ostensibly for your own good.

   4. This puts those enforcing government interventionism in a difficult
   position, particularly with respect to the prohibition of marijuana, hash,
   or cocaine and services like sexual gratification. By making the production,
   marketing, and consumption of these goods and services illegal, enforcement
   agencies are required to divert resources from the protection of person and
   property toward surveying, capturing, fining, or arresting willing
   consumers, purveyors, or marketers. They are trying to halt market processes
   ­ the interplay of willing buyers and sellers. Not only is this enforcement
   activity very costly; it is also not very effective. In fact, evidence
   suggests that prohibiting drugs and prostitution is counterproductive.
   5. When something becomes illegal, consumer demand does not vanish.
   Instead, consumers seek alternative, more costly and risky, means of
   satisfying their wants. Prices are higher than they would be otherwise, and
   product diversity, quality, and quantity demanded are lower. In view of
   suppressed demand and the potential to earn large profits, individuals with
   a knack for averting authorities direct their energy and resources to
   satisfy this demand. The illegality of the activity enables the
   intermediaries to ask higher prices of consumers and to bid down prices paid
   to growers of hemp, coca, and opium poppies. It gives rise to drug cartels,
   prostitution rings, and violence associated with the protection of "their"
   territories.
   6. The government's "war on drugs" has been both a tremendous triumph and
   an abysmal failure. Drug warriors have been very successful. We have all
   seen media images of police stings involving massive amounts of money,
   drugs, and firearms. However, this has had no impact in local markets.
   Illegal drugs are available just about everywhere and at prices that have
   fallen in real terms over time. The amount of pot that could be bought for
   $10 at a local high school in 1980, for example, is likely the same quantity
   that could be obtained for $10 today.
   7. Prohibition advocates can point to some positive effects. The quantity
   demanded of soft drugs such as marijuana and hash is likely lower than it
   would be otherwise. The same can be said of prostitution. But it is hard to
   believe that the desired effects are anywhere large enough to justify the
   human cost of their prohibition in terms of lives lost and lives destroyed.



Danny LeRoy is an associate professor of agricultural economics at the
University of Lethbridge in Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.

Read more: The Underground Economy in One Page - Danny G. LeRoy - Mises
Daily <http://mises.org/daily/4429#ixzz0p572frfc>
http://mises.org/daily/4429#ixzz0p572frfc

 __._,_.___



 .

__,_._,___

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to