"Communiuty Reinvestment Act" ------------- Aggressively developing new mortgage products so that conventional market alternatives are available to combat the predatory loan products that are disproportionately targeted to minorities; Creating new mortgage products to meet the unique needs of recent immigrants;
http://www.policyalmanac.org/social_welfare/archive/wh_minority_housing.shtml a speech he gave to freddy and fanny and their closest friends. ----------------------- call for wilderness drilling, incentives for oil companies ----------- he failed here too. ============== How so? -------- Congress ignored his call to end incentives to oil companies and wilderness drilling. On Jun 9, 10:01 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:42 PM, euwe <[email protected]> wrote: > > deregulation of banks and oil drilling, > > *See* the "Democrats'/Socialist-Elitists'/Anti-American's" policy > called, > "Communiuty Reinvestment Act" which caused the whole economic debacle. > Attached is a post I wrote to Euwetopia (and PF) almost two years ago: > > --------------- > Bush participated and succeeded. > > ================== > > Euwe, > > You have your facts completely wrong, and are attempting to cover up the the > worst economic boondoggles in our Nation's History. The Bush Administration > called for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac reforms repeatedly, all to fall upon > deaf ears by the Socialist-Elitist controlled Congress: > > *"Bush Called For Reform of Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac 17 Times in 2008 > Alone... Dems Ignored Warnings"* > > http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/09/bush-called-for-reform-of-f... > > ================== > > call for wilderness drilling, incentives for oil companies > ----------- > he failed here too. > > ============== > > How so? > > > > > reducing barriers for minority home ownership > > ---------- > > He called for this, and succeeded. > > > the bailout > > ------------ > > succeeded at this > > > and the longest list of clumsy misspoken lines since rock lyric > > --------- > > and this. > > > On Jun 8, 3:26 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Euwe, Euwe, Euwe. Just a few thoughts on your ramblings.....You should > > at > > > least get your facts straight.....Let's review: > > > > failure to win popular vote, > > > > (It's called, "The Electoral College" and has worked quite well for over > > 200 > > > years. It serves a purpose, from allowing the large states too much > > power, > > > in the vote....In this case, it prevented a bunch of folks who don't pay > > > taxes and believe in sucking this Nation dry; e.g.; the "Welfare Crew in > > > the inner cities" versus the rest of the American people who knew Al > > Gore > > > was a threat not only to our Nation, but to Tipper, and buffet bars > > > everywhere) > > > > bin Lostim, > > > > (Dead~~We just don't want to make a martyr out of him) > > > > "Mission Accomplished," loser; > > > > Obviously we still have troops in Iraq, and there is still an element of > > > danger there. If the goal was to leave Iraq with a stable Republican > > form > > > of government, which was democratically elected by the Iraq citizenry, > > > capable of defending itself from internal as well as external enemies, > > and > > > to leave a government that is friendly to our national interests, then I > > > would surmise that we have achieved that goal. > > > > Although I don't necessarily believe that Democrats wished for American > > > servicemen and women to be harmed, *per-se*, I do believe that many > > > Democrats wished for President Bush and his Administration to fail, and > > if > > > this cost American servicemen their lives, then this was a part and > > parcel > > > of their objective. I recall not only Harry Reid, but also "Nanc" > > Pelosi, > > > Ted Kennedy and other socialist agenda Democrats saying, "The War Is > > Lost"; > > > and opposing the surge which proved to be successful. > > > > Can you imagine, had the socialist agenda Democrats prevailed, and we > > would > > > have actually pulled our troops from Iraq over two years ago, what the > > > region would be like today? A region that would still be in conflict, > > with > > > Iran dominating the region and Iraq being nothing less than a haven for > > > terroristic individuals who wish to destroy Western Civilization. > > > > It is not an argument of whether we should have ever got involved in the > > > conflict.....We did, and I think most thinking Americans from both sides > > of > > > the aisle would agree that it was a mistake. An understandable mistake, > > but > > > a mistake nevertheless. The distinction was how those with a very > > partisan > > > agenda handled the situation. Instead of wanting to achieve victory and > > get > > > our military out of the conflict while still accomplishing the goals, > > there > > > were many Democrats whose only goal was to discredit the Bush > > > Administration. > > > > Privatized Social Security, > > > > (It's coming, and should have come over twenty years ago, long before the > > > Bush Administration, since Social Security is a dismal failure, and > > broken). > > > > Abortion, > > > > (In the United States, over 1.4 million abortions a year: > > > >http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/fastfacts.html > > > > and we have an Administration that covets partial birth abortions. > > What's > > > wrong with this picture??? ) > > > > "Faith Based Sinniative", > > > > What I don't understand from those on the far left, and even those who > > are, > > > "Moderate" is their contempt for any charity that happens to be, "Faith > > > Based". Why is this so troubling to Moonbats? > > > > For the record, the Obama Administration has continued the course: > > > >http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/election/764 > > > >http://biggovernment.com/wthuston/2010/05/16/obamas-faith-based-progr... > > > > Amnesty, > > > > Here Euwe, we might actually agree. I find it laughable, Iand deeply > > > disturbing, that a Presidential Administration, (both Republican and > > > Democrat) can ask the American people to give up some of their inherent > > > rights, in the name of security, but do nothing in order to secure our > > > borders. > > > > As compared to the Bush Administration, the Obama Administration is > > clearly > > > championing Amnesty, and the Obama Administration pales in comparison in > > > stopping illegal immigration to the Bush Administration, which I openly > > > admit, was pitiful. Here is a discussion between O'Reilly and former > > Bush > > > Administration Chief Of Staff, Karl Rove. Interesting discussion, the > > point > > > being, is that the Obama Administration could do much more: > > > >http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bill-oreilly-slams-bushs-immigration-polic... > > > > outsourcing, > > > > What, prey tell, do you think the Federal government should be doing > > about > > > this, other than lowering taxes on corporations? We need no more "Nanny > > > State"!!! > > > > deregulation of banks and oil drilling, > > > > *See* the "Democrats'/Socialist-Elitists'/Anti-American's" policy called, > > > "Communiuty Reinvestment Act" which caused the whole economic debacle. > > > Attached is a post I wrote to Euwetopia (and PF) almost two years ago: > > > > call for wilderness drilling, incentives for oil companies, > > > > We should! The disaster in the Gulf is partially caused by > > > environmentalists push for drilling in deep waters away from our shores. > > > > reducing barriers for minority home ownership, > > > > *See* Attached. All Democrats/Socialist-Elitists/Anti-Americans who > > caused > > > this. > > > > the bailout and the > > > longest list of clumsy misspoken lines since rock lyrics. > > > > > On Jun 7, 1:15 pm, JSM <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Anatomy of a failing President > > > > > > The following is an interesting article. You might ask how > > long > > > > Dr. > > > > > Hunt can remain at NIH once the White House gets wind of this > > article. > > > > > > Dr. Hunt is a social and cultural anthropologist. He has had > > > > nearly > > > > > 30 years experience in planning, conducting, and managing research in > > the > > > > > field of youth studies, and drug and alcohol research. Currently Dr. > > Hunt > > > > is > > > > > a Senior Research Scientist at the Institute for Scientific Analysis > > and > > > > the > > > > > Principal Investigator on three National Institutes of Health > > projects. > > > > He > > > > > is also a writer for American Thinker. > > > > > > ____________________________________________________ > > > > > > An article from American Thinker by Geoffrey P. Hunt: > > > > > > Anatomy of a Failing Presidency > > > > > > Barack Obama is on track to have the most spectacularly failed > > > > > presidency since Woodrow Wilson. In the modern era, we've seen > > several > > > > > failed presidencies--led by Jimmy Carter and LBJ. Failed presidents > > have > > > > > one strong common trait-- they are repudiated, in the vernacular, > > spat > > > > out. > > > > > Of course, LBJ wisely took the exit ramp early, avoiding a shove into > > > > > oncoming traffic by his own party. Richard Nixon indeed resigned in > > > > > disgrace, yet his reputation as a statesman has been partially > > restored > > > > by > > > > > his triumphant overture to China . > > > > > > But, Barack Obama is failing. Failing big. Failing fast. And > > > > failing > > > > > everywhere: foreign policy, domestic initiatives, and most > > importantly, > > > > in > > > > > forging connections with the American people. The incomparable > > Dorothy > > > > > Rabinowitz in the Wall Street Journal put her finger on it: He is > > failing > > > > > because he has no understanding of the American people, and may > > indeed > > > > > loathe them. Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard says he is failing > > > > because > > > > > he has lost control of his message, and is overexposed. Clarice > > Feldman > > > > of > > > > > American Thinker produced a dispositive commentary showing that Obama > > is > > > > > failing because fundamentally he is neither smart nor articulate; his > > > > > intellectual dishonesty is conspicuous by its audacity and lack of > > shame. > > > > > > But, there is something more seriously wrong: How could a new > > > > president > > > > > riding in on a wave of unprecedented promise and goodwill have > > forfeited > > > > his > > > > > tenure and become a lame duck in six months? His poll ratings are in > > > > free > > > > > fall. In generic balloting, the Republicans have now seized a five > > point > > > > > advantage. This truly is unbelievable. What's going on? > > > > > > No narrative. Obama doesn't have a narrative. No, not a > > narrative > > > > about > > > > > himself. He has a self-narrative, much of it fabricated, cleverly > > > > disguised > > > > > or written by someone else. But this self-narrative is isolated and > > > > doesn't > > ... > > read more » -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
