You were not paying attention at all then. The facilities in Iraq were
used by the 9/11 terrorists and other terrorists who were put out there
by OBL. Saddam was in close contact with OBL to offer these
facilities. That was proven at the time with satellite photos but again
you listened to the news and did not read what was put out there. This
goes back to that nonsense you put out about Glen Beck when I said I had
never heard him. I read the documents and the news; I don't listen to
it because I am hard of hearing. Therefore I get to see all the things
your news readers skip over in their programs. Really changes the
story when you get the whole thing from both sides.
euwe wrote:
Other than Saddam providing shelter for Abu Nidal, Training
facilities
for the people who attacked 9/11 and some of the other facilities and
funded suicide bombers, nothing at all - why do you ask. Gee, you
are
so easy!!
-----------
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_A77N5WKWM
The training facilities for the 9/11 Terrorists were provided by Jeb
Bush in Florida, not Saddam.
Bush reaffirmed the White House position in even stronger terms in a
press conference on 21 August 2006. When asked what the connection was
between Iraq and the September 11th attacks, Bush replied, "Nothing"
n October 2008, a report from the former Iraqi "Special Intelligence
Unit M4" was obtained by Robert Fisk, indicating that the Iraqis had
been interrogating Abu Nidal as a suspected spy for Kuwait and Egypt,
and indirectly for the U.S.; the documents say he had been asked by
the Kuwaitis to find links between Saddam and Al-Qaeda. It was shortly
after the first series of interrogations, and just before he was to be
moved to a more secure location, that he shot himself, the report
says. He was buried on August 29, 2002 in al-Karakh's Islamic cemetery
in Baghdad, in a grave marked only "M7".
Polls have shown that many Americans continued to believe that Saddam
was linked to al-Qaeda, although the number who do so has slowly
declined. This discrepancy has been attributed by some to the way in
which the U.S. mainstream media presented facts and opinion regarding
the war on terror.
On Jun 24, 6:15 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
Other than Saddam providing shelter for Abu Nidal, Training facilities
for the people who attacked 9/11 and some of the other facilities and
funded suicide bombers, nothing at all - why do you ask. Gee, you are
so easy!!
euwe wrote:
In what way am I wrong
---------
That Saddam or Iraqis had anything to do with the Achille Lauro, the
Lockerbie plane, the flight where the Navy Seal was killed, the
attacks on the embassies, the USS Cole, the WTC...
That's quite a few ways you are wrong.
On Jun 24, 4:51 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
In what way am I wrong. You haven't learned anything yet?????
Apparently not.
euwe wrote:
Gee, I guess maybe that they have done so in the past time and
again.
Remember the Achille Lauro, the Lockerbie plane, the flight where the
Navy Seal was killed, the attacks on the embassies, the USS Cole, the
WTC, the attacks on our allies as well, the attacks on the military
installations.
---------
You guess wrong.
On Jun 24, 4:20 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
Gee, I guess maybe that they have done so in the past time and again.
Remember the Achille Lauro, the Lockerbie plane, the flight where the
Navy Seal was killed, the attacks on the embassies, the USS Cole, the
WTC, the attacks on our allies as well, the attacks on the military
installations. I mean how many times do you have to get hit in the
head before you understand what is going on. Apparently you don't
learn much. Remember the philosopher who talked about either learning
from history or having to repeat it. Apparently you are just fine and
dandy with repeating it like somebody who keeps smacking his head on the
wall because he forgets that it hurts.
euwe wrote:
What makes yhou think that if we were not
there they would not attack us?
---------
what makes you think they would? Their enormous resources, and
education? Because they've struck us at home before? Or because we're
there, right now, killing their women and children in the name of anti-
Sharia law?
Or, can it be, you're one of those that thinks Saddam was complicit in
9/11?
On Jun 24, 4:08 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
You truly are an idiot. What makes yhou think that if we were not
there they would not attack us? We were not there in 2001 or 1998 or
2000 or when the embassies were attacked and yet they killed our
people. We were offered the leaders and Bubba turned that down. Then
they tried Bush by attacking the WTC and then they found he smacked back
- hard. No more attacks on our facilities overseas then. Now we are
getting attacked again. Lesson is that if you stand up to them they
back down. If you attack them there then they do not attack us here.
Do you want to be attacked? Have you really learned nothing in the
past 20 years? Sure seems that way.
In the meantime you make some stupid snarky comments and pat yourself on
the back for being so intelligent. Wrong!!
euwe wrote:
That is why I am glad we are in Iraq.
--------
So that they kill our soldiers? Or because we shoot strong swimmers?
On Jun 24, 3:38 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
That is why I am glad we are in Iraq. As to boogiemen, remember Fort
Hood and the Time Square bomber and the guys who were carting bomb
materials around South Carolina and Georgia until caught. You can make
all the snide remarks you like but I worked on Wall Street for years and
was working there at the time of 9/11. I for one don't appreciate your
smart coments about boogiemen. I have seen the results of not paying
attention to them or disregarding them as Clinton did and as Obama is
doing and as you are doing. Stuff that up your fundament. There is a
big hole in lower Manhattan right now and the Muslims are trying to
build a big Islamic Center and Mosque right next door to it. As I said
I prefer them to be in Iraq or Afghanistan or Iran or Yemen rather than
here.
euwe wrote:
Seen any boogiemen in your closet lately? No? Know why?
Because they're all in Iraq.
On Jun 24, 3:08 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
You want the war here.
euwe wrote:
And the war would be kept there rather than here.
---------
and the moon is made of green cheese.
On Jun 24, 2:47 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
And the war would be kept there rather than here. You missed that part
of it. Notice that we have had terrorist attacks since Bambi took
office and we had none while Bush was in office? Strange, that. And
it is Bambi's buddies who are the terrorists!!
euwe wrote:
The revolution under former president Ronald Reagan freed the people
of Soviet-dominated Europe, he declared, and is destined now to
liberate the Middle East as well.
---------
And all for just a few billion dollars.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
