we know who is promoting a war against Iran warmongers and jews let'em fight w/o US tax dollars
On Aug 3, 12:50 am, "M. Johnson" <[email protected]> wrote: > "Language contained in the resolution condemns Iran “for its threats of > annihilating the United States and the State of Israel” (threats Iran has > never issued) and supports the use of “all means of persuading the Government > of Iran to stop building and acquiring nuclear weapons" (nuclear weapons Iran > does not have and does not possess the capability to produce). Gohmert's bill > supports Israel’s "right" to use “all means necessary to confront and > eliminate nuclear threats posed by Iran.” "The Mandatory Service Bill and the > Impending Attack On IranKurt Nimmo > Infowars.com > August 1, 2010 > Rep. Charles Rangel may be in trouble because he is your standard corrupt > district of criminals opportunist, but that has not killed his mandatory > slavery bill. On July 15,Rangel introduced H.R. 5741, the Universal National > Service Act, and it was referred to the House Armed Services Subcommittee on > Military Personnel on July 23. Even though the bill does not have > co-sponsors, it is currently under debate. > > “I have introduced legislation to reinstate the draft and to make it > permanent during time of war,” said Rep. Charles Rangel. > “I have introduced legislation to reinstate the draft and to make it > permanent during time of war. It is H.R. 5741, and what this does is to make > everyone between the ages of 18 and 42 – whether they’re men or women, > whether they’re straight or gay – to have the opportunity to defend this > great country whenever the president truly believes that our national > security is threatened,” Rangel said from the floor of the House. > Rangel specifically said the legislation is designed to be used “during time > of war.” On the day before Rangel’s slavery bill went to the House Armed > Services Subcommittee on Military Personnel, Texas Rep.Louis Buller Gohmert > introduced House Resolution 1553. It has since been referred to the Committee > on Foreign Affairs. > “Expressing support for the State of Israel’s right to defend Israeli > sovereignty, to protect the lives and safety of the Israeli people, and to > use all means necessary to confront and eliminate nuclear threats posed by > the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the use of military force if no other > peaceful solution can be found within reasonable time to protect against such > an immediate and existential threat to the State of Israel,”Gohmert’s > resolution states. > Language contained in the resolution condemns Iran “for its threats of > annihilating the United States and the State of Israel” (threats Iran has > never issued) and supports the use of “all means of persuading the Government > of Iran to stop building and acquiring nuclear weapons” (nuclear weapons Iran > does not have and does not possess the capability to produce). Gohmert’s bill > supports Israel’s “right” to use “all means necessary to confront and > eliminate nuclear threats posed by Iran.” > In 2007, MohamedEl Baradei, at the time the head of the International Atomic > Energy Agency, said Iran did not have nuclear material and also stated that > the country did not have a weaponization program. > Also in 2007, theNational Intelligence Council, where U.S. mid-term and > long-term strategic policy is formulated for the intelligence community, > stated “with moderate-to-high confidence… Iran does not currently have a > nuclear weapon.” > “There is no evidence that Iran has made a decision to produce nuclear > weapons,” said Russia’s Foreign MinisterSergei Lavrovwhile speaking out > against sanctions on Iran. > In July 21, the day before Gohmert introduced House Resolution 1553, Iranian > Parliament SpeakerAli Larijanisaid the U.S. and Russia know that Iran does > not have any nuclear weapons. > Despite the fact there is no evidence of an Iranian nuclear weapons program > and no indication Iran plans to attack Israel, let alone the absurd notion it > will attack the United States, Israel and the United States are preparing to > attack Iran. The claim Iran plans to attack the United States is ironically > reminiscent of the neocon accusation that Saddam Hussein planned to attack > the U.S., one of several obvious falsehoods used as an excuse to invade. > “Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak of Israel > have been shuttling between Washington and Tel Aviv, pushing for crippling > economic sanctions that even they concede will not change Iran’s nuclear > policy. These sanctions are being put in place, both by the United States and > its allies. The open prediction that they will fail is meant to indicate just > one thing military attacks are inevitable,” writesMuhammad Sahimifor PBS. > “The rhetorical rationale for attacking Iran keeps coming out of Washington. > Most astonishingly, there is a resolution before the U.S. Congress, signed by > one-third of the Republican caucus, that urges support for Israeli military > attacks on Iran…. The resolution, H. Res. 1553, represents a green light for > a bombing campaign. It provides explicit support for military strikes.” > The bomb Iran consensus was underscored late last month when former CIA > directorMichael Haydentold CNN’s State of the Union that a military attack > against Iran “seems inexorable.” Hayden added that in his “personal thinking, > I have begun to consider that that may not be the worst of all possible > outcomes.” In other words, for Hayden, mass murder is preferable to diplomacy. > “The next step is tough sanctions, economic sanctions. Frankly it’s a last > chance for Iran to avoid giving the rest of the world, including the United > States, a hard choice between allowing Iran to go nuclear and using military > power to stop them from doing that,” saidSen. Joe Liebermanin April. > “We have to contemplate the final option,” saidSen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., “the > use of force to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon.” > “The administration needs to expand its approach and make clear to the > Iranian regime and the American people: If diplomatic and economic pressures > do not compel Iran to terminate its nuclear program, the U.S. military has > the capability and is prepared to launch an effective, targeted strike on > Tehran’s nuclear and supporting military facilities,” former senator Charles > S. Robb and retired general Charles Wald wrote for theWashington Poston July > 9. > Slaughtering innocents is a “terrible thing,” said Sen. Lindsay Graham, > R-S.C., but “sometimes it is better to go to war than to allow the Holocaust > to develop a second time.” > Graham made this ludicrous statement regardless of the fact Iran has never > threatened to attack Israel. It is based on amistranslationof a speech > delivered by Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad published in the New York > Times. > The Times played a big role in the Iraq invasion when Judith Miller published > neocon lies about aluminum tubes and other such patently fallacious nonsense. > Neocon lies ultimately resulted in the murder of more than a million Iraqis, > a total approaching Nazi war crimes. > As should be expected, the neocons figure big in the Iran attack plot now > unfolding. “If military force is ever employed, it should be done in a > decisive fashion. The Iran government’s ability to wage conventional war > against its neighbors and our troops in the region should not exist. They > should not have one plane that can fly or one ship that can float.”Danielle > Pletkaof the American Enterprise Institute wrote earlier this year. > In other words, according to neocons over at the criminal organization > largely responsible for mass murder in Iraq, Iran should be reduced to a > parking lot in order to prevent it from responding to an attack. > NeoconReuel Marc Gerechtexplains how the United States will be sucked into an > Israeli-launched attack against Iran. “What is important to understand about > this campaign is that the aim of Gerecht and of the right-wing government of > Benjamin Netanyahu is to support an attack by Israel so that the United > States can be drawn into direct, full-scale war with Iran,” writes > historianGareth Porter.That has long been the Israeli strategy for Iran, > because Israel cannot fight a war with Iran without full U.S. involvement. > Israel needs to know that the United States will finish the war that Israel > wants to start.Gerecht openly expresses the hope that any Iranian response to > the Israeli attack would trigger full-scale U.S. war against Iran. “If > Khamenei has a death-wish, he’ll let the Revolutionary Guards mine the > strait, the entrance to the Persian Gulf,” writes Gerecht. “It might be the > only thing that would push President Obama to strike Iran militarily….”Self > defense is not an option. If Iran responds to an attack and its leadershiphas > stated repeatedly it willthe U.S. will become directly involved. > “Gerecht’s argument for war relies on a fanciful nightmare scenario of Iran > doling out nuclear weapons to Islamic extremists all over the Middle East. > But the real concern of the Israelis and their lobbyists, as Gerecht’s past > writing has explicitly stated, is to destroy Iran’s Islamic regime in a > paroxysm of U.S. military violence,” writes Porter. > This “paroxysm of U.S. military violence” will undoubtedly call for adding a > fresh crop of bullet-stoppers and that is where H.R. 5721 comes into play. As > Rangel noted, his bill will provide under government imposed mandate that > “everyone between the ages of 18 and 42 – whether they’re men or women, > whether they’re straight or gay – to have the opportunity to defend this > great country” from imaginary and trumped-up enemies. > Rangel’s bill may never make it out of committee. The attack on Iran, > however, is all but a foregone > conclusion.http://www.infowars.com/the-mandatory-serviece-bill-and-the-impending-attack-on-iran/ -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
