*What the Ground Zero Mosque Controversy Reveals About America’s “Politically Correct Elites”*
*Our petition<http://tool.donation-net.net/ACT4America/GroundZeroMosque.cfm?dn=1097&commID=33701044&ID=96265>now over 81,000 names strong! * * Dear Xanue, The Ground Zero Mosque controversy has exposed, once again, the Grand Canyon-wide divide that exists between the “heartland” of America and America’s “politically correct elites,” who insist on lecturing the rest of us about why we are wrong to oppose the 13 story mosque at Ground Zero. - The Wall Street Journal column below is a MUST READ in this regard. - Tuesday night, Bill O’Reilly slammed<http://tool.donation-net.net/Act4America/OReillyAwadInterview.cfm?dn=1097&commID=33701044&ID=96265>CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad’s refusal to answer two basic questions about the Ground Zero Mosque. Awad went so far as to say “there is no linkage between the Islamic faith and 9/11.” - O’Reilly followed Awad’s appearance with a revealing interview<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhkM0kxbP74>with Newt Gingrich, who called the effort to build a mosque at Ground Zero a “political act.” ** Taqiyya is the Islamic practice of “concealing or disguising one’s belief, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions and/or strategies at a time of eminent dangers, whether now or later in time, to save oneself from physical and/or mental injury. Taqiyya is also used as justification for lies and deceit to advance the cause of Islam.* *What started small has become a national groundswell. Brigitte Gabriel has done dozens of TV and radio interviews, helping raise national awareness and opposition to the Ground Zero Mosque, with approximately 60% of Americans now opposed. Our petition<http://tool.donation-net.net/ACT4America/GroundZeroMosque.cfm?dn=1097&commID=33701044&ID=96265>now has over 81,000 names. If you haven’t signed yet, please do so today<http://tool.donation-net.net/ACT4America/GroundZeroMosque.cfm?dn=1097&commID=33701044&ID=96265> . The American Center for Law and Justice is filing a lawsuit<http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/08/american-center-for-law-and-justice-poised-to-file-court-challenge-to-islamic-supremacist-mega-mosqu.html>opposing the construction of the mosque at Ground Zero, and boycotts of New York City are being discussed. America, this is your opportunity to speak out! Enough of out-of-touch, politically correct elites dictating to the rest of us! Help us continue to mobilize public opinion by signing our petition<http://tool.donation-net.net/ACT4America/GroundZeroMosque.cfm?dn=1097&commID=33701044&ID=96265>and forwarding this email to everyone you know! * ------------------------------ The Wall Street Journal/OPINION *August 4 2010* *Liberal Piety and the Memory of 9/11* *The enlightened class can't understand why the public is uneasy about the Ground Zero mosque.* (Remember these are the same politicians that are getting sick and tired of US citizens telling them what to do. <http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=185741> They obviously know better <sic> and they just want you to keep your mouth shut. gb) *By DOROTHY RABINOWITZ<http://online.wsj.com/search/term.html?KEYWORDS=DOROTHY+RABINOWITZ&bylinesearch=true> * Americans may have lacked for much in the course of their history, but never instruction in social values. The question today is whether Americans of any era have ever confronted the bombardment of hectoring and sermonizing now directed at those whose views are deemed insufficiently enlightened—an offense regularly followed by accusations that the offenders have violated the most sacred principles of our democracy. It doesn't take a lot to become the target of such a charge. There is no mistaking the beliefs on display in these accusations, most recently in regard to the mosque about to be erected 600 feet from Ground Zero. Which is that without the civilizing dictates of their superiors in government, ordinary Americans are lost to reason and decency. They are the kind of people who—as a recent presidential candidate put it—cling to their guns and their religion. There is no better exemplar of that faith than New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, though in this he is hardly alone. Compared with the Obama White House, Mr. Bloomberg is a piker in the preachments and zealotry department. Still, no voice brings home more unforgettably the attitudes that speak for today's enlightened and progressive class. Immediately after the suspect in the attempted car bombing near Times Square was revealed to be Faisal Shahzad, of Pakistani origin, Mayor Bloomberg addressed the public. In admonishing tones—a Bloomberg trademark invariably suggestive of a school principal who knows exactly what to expect of the incorrigibles it is his unhappy fate to oversee—the mayor delivered a warning. There would be no toleration of "any bias or backlash against Pakistani or Muslim New Yorkers." That there has been a conspicuous lack of any such behavior on the part of New Yorkers or Americans elsewhere from the 9/11 attacks to the present seems not to have impressed Mr. Bloomberg. Nor has it caused any moderation in the unvarying note of indignation the mayor brings to these warnings. It's reasonable to raise a proper caution. It's quite something else to do it as though addressing a suspect rabble. It's hard to know the sort of rabble the mayor had in mind when he told a television interviewer, prior to Shahzad's identification, that it "could be anything," someone mentally disturbed, or "somebody with a political agenda who doesn't like the health-care bill." Nowhere in the range of colorful possibilities the mayor raised was there any mention of the most likely explanation—another terrorist attempt by a soldier of radical Islam, the one that occurred to virtually every American who had heard the reports. The citizens were, of course, right. Those leaders bent on dissuading them from their grasp of the probable cause of this near disaster were left with their red herrings hanging—but remembered. Mr. Bloomberg's "someone who doesn't like the health-care bill" would be inscribed in the golden book of howlers these events have yielded, along with Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano's brisk assurance there was no evidence this was anything but "a one-off." The notion that it is for the greater good that the people be led to suspect virtually any cause but the one they had the most reason to fear reflects a contempt for the citizenry that's of longstanding, but never so blatant as today. It is in the interest of higher values, Americans understand—higher, that is, than theirs—that they are now expected to accept official efforts to becloud reality. Such values were the rationale for the official will to ignore the highly suspicious behavior of Maj. Nidal Hasan, who went on to murder 13 Americans at Fort Hood. A silence maintained despite all his commanders and colleagues knew about his raging hostility to the U.S. military and his strident advocacy on behalf of political Islam. Those who knew—and they were many—chose silence out of fear of seeming insensitive to a Muslim. As one who had said nothing in the interest of this higher good later explained, Maj. Hasan was, after all, one of the few top-ranking Muslim officers the army had. In the plan for an Islamic center and mosque some 15 stories high to be built near Ground Zero, the full force of politically correct piety is on display along with the usual unyielding assault on all dissenters. The project has aroused intense opposition from New Yorkers and Americans across the country. It has also elicited remarkable streams of oratory from New York's political leaders, including Attorney General Andrew Cuomo. "What are we all about if not religious freedom?" a fiery Mr. Cuomo asked early in this drama. Mr. Cuomo, running for governor, has since had less to say. The same cannot be said for Mr. Bloomberg, who has gone on to deliver regular meditations on the need to support the mosque, and on the iniquity of its opponents. In the course of a speech at Dartmouth on July 16 he raised the matter unasked, and held forth on his contempt for those who opposed the project and even wanted to investigate the funding: "I just think it's the most outrageous thing anybody could suggest." Ground Zero is a "very appropriate place" for a mosque, the mayor announced, because it "tells the world" that in America, we have freedom of religion for everybody. Here was an idea we have been hearing more and more of lately—the need to show the world America's devotion to democracy and justice, also cited by the administration as a reason to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in New York City. Who is it, we can only wonder, that requires these proofs? What occasions these regular brayings on the need to show the world the United States is a free nation? It's unlikely that the preachments now directed at opponents of the project by Mayor Bloomberg and others will persuade that opposition. Those fighting the building recognize full well the deliberate obtuseness of Mr. Bloomberg's exhortations, and those of Mr. Cuomo and others: the resort to pious battle cries, the claim that antagonists of the plan stand against religious freedom. They note, especially, the refusal to confront the obvious question posed by this proposed center towering over the ruins of 9/11. It is a question most ordinary Americans, as usual, have no trouble defining. Namely, how is it that the planners, who have presented this effort as a grand design for the advancement of healing and interfaith understanding, have refused all consideration of the impact such a center will have near Ground Zero? Why have they insisted, despite intense resistance, on making the center an assertive presence in this place of haunted memory? It is an insistence that calls to mind the Flying Imams, whose ostentatious prayers—apparently designed to call attention to themselves on a U.S. Airways flight to Phoenix in November 2006—ended in a lawsuit. The imams sued. The airlines paid. Dr. Zuhdi Jasser—devout Muslim, physician, former U.S. Navy lieutenant commander and founder of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy—says there is every reason to investigate the center's funding under the circumstances. Of the mosque so near the site of the 9/11 attacks, he notes "It will certainly be seen as a victory for political Islam." The center may be built where planned. But it will not go easy or without consequence to the politicians intent on jamming the project down the public throat, in the name of principle. Liberal piety may have met its match in the raw memory of 9/11, and in citizens who have come to know pure demagoguery when they hear it. They have had, of late, plenty of practice. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <http://www.actforamerica.org> <http://tool.donation-net.net/Act4America/DonationPage.cfm?dn=1097&commID=33701044&ID=96265> -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
