Move to End ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Stalls in Senate By DAVID M.
HERSZENHORN<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/h/david_m_herszenhorn/index.html?inline=nyt-per>
Published:
September 21, 2010

   - Twitter
   - comments 
(88)<http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/us/politics/22cong.html>
   - Sign In to E-Mail <javascript:void(0);>
   - 
Print<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/us/politics/22cong.html?_r=1&nl=us&emc=politicsemailema1&pagewanted=print>
   
<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/us/politics/22cong.html?_r=1&nl=us&emc=politicsemailema1&pagewanted=all>
   -     
Reprints<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/us/politics/22cong.html?_r=1&nl=us&emc=politicsemailema1#>
   - 
Share<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/us/politics/22cong.html?_r=1&nl=us&emc=politicsemailema1#>
   
Close<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/us/politics/22cong.html?_r=1&nl=us&emc=politicsemailema1#>
      - 
Linkedin<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/us/politics/22cong.html?_r=1&nl=us&emc=politicsemailema1#>
      - 
Digg<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/us/politics/22cong.html?_r=1&nl=us&emc=politicsemailema1#>
      - 
Mixx<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/us/politics/22cong.html?_r=1&nl=us&emc=politicsemailema1#>
      - 
MySpace<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/us/politics/22cong.html?_r=1&nl=us&emc=politicsemailema1#>
      - Yahoo! 
Buzz<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/us/politics/22cong.html?_r=1&nl=us&emc=politicsemailema1#>
      - 
Permalink<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/us/politics/22cong.html?_r=1&nl=us&emc=politicsemailema1#>
      -

<http://www.nytimes.com/adx/bin/adx_click.html?type=goto&opzn&page=www.nytimes.com/yr/mo/day/us/politics&pos=Frame4A&sn2=4e88d5fe/69d06416&sn1=9add374b/938815ea&camp=foxsearch2010_emailtools_1225560c_nyt5&ad=Conviction_120x60_07.27&goto=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Efoxsearchlight%2Ecom%2Fconviction>

WASHINGTON — With Congress increasingly paralyzed by the partisan fury of
the midterm elections, the Senate on Tuesday voted against taking up a major
military bill that includes a provision allowing the repeal of the “don’t
ask, don’t 
tell<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/d/dont_ask_dont_tell/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>policy”
regarding gay soldiers.
  Enlarge This 
Image<javascript:pop_me_up2('http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2010/09/22/us/22collins.html','22collins_html','width=720,height=562,scrollbars=yes,toolbars=no,resizable=yes')>
<javascript:pop_me_up2('http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2010/09/22/us/22collins.html','22collins_html','width=720,height=562,scrollbars=yes,toolbars=no,resizable=yes')>
Drew Angerer/The New York Times

Senator Susan Collins spoke with reporters on Capitol Hill on Tuesday.
 Multimedia
 Interactive Map
<http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/111/senate/2/238?ref=politics>
Senate 
Vote<http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/111/senate/2/238?ref=politics>
 Related

   - The Caucus: Move to Repeal Military’s Gay Ban Faces
Filibuster<http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/21/senate-democrats-dont-filibuster-gay-service-ban/?ref=politics>(September
21, 2010)
   - At War: Gays Discuss Their Military
Service<http://atwar.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/20/gay-service-members-discuss-dont-ask-dont-tell/?ref=politics>(September
20, 2010)
   - Times Topic: Don't Ask, Don't
Tell<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/d/dont_ask_dont_tell/index.html>

 Blog
 <http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/>
The Caucus <http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/>

The latest on President Obama, his administration and other news from
Washington and around the nation. Join the
discussion.<http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/>

   - FiveThirtyEight: Nate Silver's Political
Calculus<http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/>
   - More Politics News <http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/index.html>

 Readers' Comments

Share your thoughts.


   - Post a Comment
»<http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/us/politics/22cong.html#postComment>
   - Read All Comments (88)
»<http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/us/politics/22cong.html>

 Senate Republicans voted unanimously to block debate on the bill — the
huge, annual authorization of military programs — after the majority leader,
Harry 
Reid<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/r/harry_reid/index.html?inline=nyt-per>,
Democrat of Nevada, said he would attach a number of the Democrats’
election-year priorities to it while also moving to limit the amendments
offered by Republicans.

The vote was 56 to
43<5http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/111/senate/2/238>,
with Democrats falling short of the 60 votes needed to overcome a
filibuster<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/f/filibusters_and_debate_curbs/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>and
take up the bill. The Arkansas Democrats, Senators Blanche L. Lincoln
and Mark Pryor, sided with all 40 Republicans present in opposing debate.
Mr. Reid switched his vote to no at the last minute, a procedural maneuver
that allows him to call for a revote.

Congress has approved the annual Pentagon authorization bill for 48
consecutive years, and it seems likely that the measure will be brought up
again after the election in the relatively calmer — if somewhat
unpredictable — atmosphere of a lame-duck session.

The House has already approved legislation allowing the repeal of “don’t
ask, don’t tell,” and the provision will likely be easier to pass in the
Senate after Dec. 1 when a Pentagon study on the effects of ending the
policy is due.

As it stands, the Senate measure would not allow repeal of the policy until
after the study is completed and President
Obama<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/barack_obama/index.html?inline=nyt-per>and
top military commanders certify that ending “don’t ask, don’t tell”
would not harm morale or impede battle readiness of the armed forces.

Among the amendments that Mr. Reid had pledged to attach to the bill was an
immigration<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/i/immigration_and_refugees/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>measure
that would create a path to citizenship for certain illegal aliens
who arrived in the United States as children.

That effort was viewed by Republicans as a naked political ploy to mobilize
Hispanic voters in races across the country, including Mr. Reid’s own
re-election campaign in Nevada.

While Democrats immediately sought to blame Republicans for obstructing both
the immigration measure, known as the Dream Act, and the repeal of “don’t
ask, don’t tell,” it is unclear how the measures, and the military bill
itself, would have fared under less intense political circumstances.

The language allowing the Pentagon to end the provision, for instance, was
approved last spring by the Senate Armed Services Committee, and at the time
even won the support of one Republican, Senator Susan
Collins<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/c/susan_collins/index.html?inline=nyt-per>of
Maine. Top military leaders including Defense Secretary Robert
M. 
Gates<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/g/robert_m_gates/index.html?inline=nyt-per>and
Adm. Mike
Mullen<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/m/michael_g_mullen/index.html?inline=nyt-per>,
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/j/joint_chiefs_of_staff/index.html?inline=nyt-org>,
have called for the repeal.

Since the repeal provision is now part of the base military bill, opponents
of a repeal would need the support of 60 senators to remove it — an unlikely
prospect.

In addition, at least one Democrat who opposed the repeal language, Senator
Jim Webb of Virginia, had said he would not vote against the overall bill
simply to maintain the “don’t ask don’t tell” policy.

But substantive policy disagreements were a secondary consideration in the
skirmishing on the Senate floor on Tuesday. Ms. Collins, who is aligned with
Democrats on the “don’t ask, don’t tell” repeal, nonetheless voted against
allowing debate to begin, and sharply criticized Mr. Reid for politicizing
the military measure.

“There are many controversial issues in this bill,” Ms. Collins said in a
floor speech. “They deserve to have a civil, fair and open debate on the
Senate floor, and that is why I am so disappointed that rather than allowing
full and open debate and the opportunity for amendments from both sides of
the aisle, the majority leader apparently intends to shut down the debate
and exclude Republicans from offering a number of amendments.”

>From a policy perspective, the immigration measure was more controversial
and Democrats seemed likely to face opposition to it not only by Republicans
but from within their own ranks.

Adding the measure to the bill would similarly require 60 votes, and aides
in both parties said the effort would likely have failed. Mr. Reid had
effectively invited Republicans to block the bill by announcing beforehand
that there was simply no time to finish debate on the military authorization
bill and that it would have to be completed after the election.

Still, Senator Carl
Levin<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/l/carl_levin/index.html?inline=nyt-per>,
Democrat of Michigan and chairman of the Armed Services Committee, had urged
his colleagues to allow the debate to get underway. “We should not deny the
Senate the opportunity to take up a bill, which is essential for the men and
women in the military because we disagree with some of the provisions in the
bill,” Mr. Levin said.

Going forward, the broader military measure is not without complications.
Although the Obama administration strongly supports repealing the “don’t
ask, don’t tell” policy, the White House has already threatened to veto the
House version of the military bill over several provisions that it opposes,
including the authorization of $485 million for construction of an extra
engine for the F-35 joint strike
fighter<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/m/military_aircraft/f35_airplane/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>.
The White House believes that spending is wasteful.
More:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/us/politics/22cong.html?_r=1&nl=us&emc=politicsemailema1

-- 
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to