Are you say that Libby took the fall for others? No argument from me there.... the question that I have for you is.... "If Libby fell on his sword like a "good soldier".... WHAT DOES IT SAY FOR THOSE "ABOVE HIM" THAT HE COVERED FOR?" Sorry for the caps. I did it by error but it makes the point... So who was "worth" more than Libby.... Cheney ? maybe worth the sacrifice... who else? nominal9 On Sep 22, 5:57 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > He lost his career. He had to give up his law license and he > really shouldn't have been charged with anything. The FBI agent > conveniently lost his notes from other people and when he testified > could not back up anything he said with notes from the interviews. > Fitz then, even after being told not to bringup new subjects in his > summing up did precisely that. Two of the jury members should never > have been seated. They lied about their background, one of them even > having worked directly for Tom Russert and taking notes to write stories > about the jury decisions. Tom Russert was the one whose testimony did > the most damage to Libby and Tom Russert was one of those who the FBI > agent lost his notes on. Altogether the whole trial was a scam. > > On 09/22/2010 05:14 PM, nominal9 wrote: > > > > > Libby?... pay the price?.....Come on!.... I don't think he even got > > Community Service..... > > nominal9 > > > On Sep 22, 3:46 pm, dick thompson<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Totally agree. And Armitrage should have been charged with what he > >> did as well. Instead Armitage gets off scot free and Libby has to pay > >> the price for what he had nothing to do with. > > >> On 09/22/2010 02:27 PM, Keith In Tampa wrote: > > >>> I think it has been proven, time and time again, that Iraq /did/ go > >>> uranium shopping in Niger. That Joe Wilson is a typical partisan > >>> hack, who did everything he could do to discredit the Bush > >>> Administration. > >>> Where the Bush Administration failed, was that they didn't expose > >>> Wilson for the hack that he was. He should have been charged with > >>> treason. > > >>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:17 PM, dick thompson > >>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >>> > >>> http://video.nytimes.com/video/2010/09/21/opinion/1248069063668/what-... > >>> > >>> <http://video.nytimes.com/video/2010/09/21/opinion/1248069063668/what-...> > > >>> -- > >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > >>> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > >>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > >>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/> * It's active and moderated. > >>> Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, > >>> and more. > > >>> -- > >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > >>> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > >>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
