Florida Court Calls Ban on Gay Adoptions Unlawful
Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Martin Gill with an enlargement of a state form asking about sexual
orientation.
By JOHN 
SCHWARTZ<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/s/john_schwartz/index.html?inline=nyt-per>
Published:
September 22, 2010

   - Twitter
   - Sign In to E-Mail <javascript:void(0);>
   - Print<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/23/us/23adopt.html?pagewanted=print>
   <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/23/us/23adopt.html?pagewanted=all>
   -     Reprints <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/23/us/23adopt.html#>
   - Share 
<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/23/us/23adopt.html#>Close<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/23/us/23adopt.html#>
      - Linkedin <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/23/us/23adopt.html#>
      - Digg <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/23/us/23adopt.html#>
      - Mixx <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/23/us/23adopt.html#>
      - MySpace <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/23/us/23adopt.html#>
      - Yahoo! Buzz <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/23/us/23adopt.html#>
      - Permalink <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/23/us/23adopt.html#>
      -

<http://www.nytimes.com/adx/bin/adx_click.html?type=goto&opzn&page=www.nytimes.com/yr/mo/day/us&pos=Frame4A&sn2=49a9ec0b/60172910&sn1=fbf0f0a/94ac466a&camp=foxsearch2010_emailtools_1225560c_nyt5&ad=nlmg_120x60_now.gif&goto=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Efoxsearchlight%2Ecom%2Fneverletmego>

A 30-year-old Florida law that prohibits adoption by gay men and lesbians is
unconstitutional, a state appeals court ruled on Wednesday, and the state’s
governor said the law would not be enforced pending a decision on whether to
appeal.
  Enlarge This 
Image<javascript:pop_me_up2('http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2010/09/23/us/adopt-2.html','adopt_2_html','width=370,height=600,scrollbars=yes,toolbars=no,resizable=yes')>
<javascript:pop_me_up2('http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2010/09/23/us/adopt-2.html','adopt_2_html','width=370,height=600,scrollbars=yes,toolbars=no,resizable=yes')>
Martin Gill

Martin Gill took in two boys as foster children and is challenging a state
adoption law.

The decision by Florida’s Third District Court of
Appeal<http://www.3dca.flcourts.org/Opinions/3D08-3044.pdf>said that
Florida’s adoption law, which bans adoption by gay men and
lesbians while allowing them to be foster parents, had “no rational basis”
and thus violated the equal protection clause in the State Constitution.
Judge Gerald B. Cope Jr. wrote the opinion, which affirmed a 2008 decision
from a lower court.

At a news conference on Wednesday afternoon, Gov. Charlie
Crist<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/c/charlie_crist/index.html?>applauded
the decision, saying: “It’s a very good day for Florida; it’s a
great day for children. Children deserve a loving home to be in.”

Because the decision applies statewide, he said, “We are going to
immediately stop enforcing the ban.”

The state, however, has 30 days to appeal. The governor said that he had
spoken with the secretary of Florida’s Department of Children and Families,
but did not say whether there would be an appeal.

A spokeswoman for Bill McCollum, the state attorney
general,<http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/people/m/bill_mccollum/index.html?>who
has voiced support of the adoption ban, said his office was
representing
the department in the case, “and will be in discussions with our client as
to whether or not they plan to appeal.”

A spokesman for the department said, “The primary consideration on whether
to appeal is finding the balance between the value of a final ruling from
the Florida Supreme Court versus the impact on the Gill family.”

Judge Cope wrote that “our ruling is unlikely to be the last word.”

The case involved the efforts of Martin Gill, a gay man, to adopt two
brothers he took in more than five years ago as foster children when one was
4 years old and the other 4 months old. They had ringworm at the time, and
the younger child had an untreated ear infection. The older boy did not
speak for the first month with Mr. Gill and his partner.

“When they came in the door, we were kind of shocked at what bad condition
we were in,” Mr. Gill said Wednesday in an interview. “We realized we had
our work cut out for us.”

He added, “I would say today they are two happy, healthy, normal kids.”

In a concurring opinion, Judge Vance E. Salter wrote that the steps taken to
heal and raise the boys “are nothing short of heroic.”

Evidence presented at the trial by opponents of the ban found no difference
in the well-being of children raised by gay parents versus heterosexual
parents.

Judge Cope wrote that at the trial, the state presented only two expert
witnesses, one of whom undercut the state’s case by disagreeing with the
idea of a blanket ban on gay adoption, stating instead that
adoptions<http://www.nytimes.com/info/adoptions/?inline=nyt-classifier>should
be considered case by case. The other expert called by the state, Dr.
George A. Rekers, was criticized by opposing experts as having provided
research that was rife with “errors in scientific methodology and reporting”
and that “did not meet established standards in the field.”

The court did not comment on the fact that Dr. Rekers, who was paid $120,000
for his work in the case, has since been enmeshed in a scandal after he was
discovered to have taken a 10-day trip to Europe with a young man who
advertised sexual services on a site for gay escorts.

According to the lower court decision cited in the opinion on Wednesday,
“Florida is the only remaining state to expressly ban all gay adoptions
without exception.”

Howard Simon, the executive director of the A.C.L.U. of Florida, which
represented the Gill family <http://www.aclufl.org/adoption/gill.cfm>,
hailed the decision on Wednesday as a blow against discrimination that means
all potential adoptive parents “will be judged on their individual fitness
to provide a loving, stable, permanent adoptive home.”

That means, he said, that “some gays will be disqualified, and some
heterosexuals will be disqualified,” but that “nobody is going to be
categorically excluded because of who they are.”

Conservative organizations attacked the decision. Mathew D. Staver, founder
of Liberty Counsel <http://www.lc.org/> and dean of the Liberty University
School of Law <http://law.liberty.edu/>, said in a statement, “Common sense
and human history underscore the fact that children need a mother and a
father.”

Mr. Gill said that during the long trial process he had been careful to
shield the boys from news that might make them fear further disruption in
their lives, including threats about being removed from their home.

“I try to keep it all positive, and try to insulate them from the negative,”
Mr. Gill said. But, he added, “I’m certainly going to tell them we have a
victory today.”
More:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/23/us/23adopt.html

-- 
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to