Hey Tom! Check this out! Maybe you can join?
http://www.uncoverage.net/2010/09/ann-coulter-at-homocon-the-gay-conservative-discussion/ And....Lemme think......Your comments about Coulter with a big Adams Apple is.....Maybe equivalent to saying, "That's so gay"???? On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote: > *Keith-* > ** > *Ann Colter has a long history of inflamatory anti-gay statements, > includeng frequent use of the slurs "faggot" and "Thats so gay". * > *She is a well known hateful homophobe. * > ** > *Some claim that she is really a transexual, because of her prominent > adam's apple and her masculine appearance.* > ** > *Examples:* > > > Ann Coulter, “That’s So Gay,” and Thought Police in > Schools<http://americansfortruth.com/news/ann-coulter-thats-so-gay-and-thought-police-in-schools.html> > > By Peter LaBarbera > > [image: ann_coulter.jpg]Ann Coulter has been roundly denounced for using > the “F-word” (six letters) – see this article by Matt > Barber<http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/MattBarber/2007/03/06/did_ann_coulter_say_bag_it>of > Concerned Women for America and this > article by Albert > Mohler<http://americansfortruth.com/news/dr-albert-mohler-recovering-civilityand-refusing-to-deny-the-obvious.html>). > I’m > a Coulter fan, but she crossed the line on this one. > > There are larger issues at stake here for American freedom: today it’s the > F-word, which has been banished as the sexual equivalent of the N-word. > Tomorrow it could be certain applications of the G-word: > G-A-Y. Many students use *“That’s so gay”* to connote something that they > think is stupid or weird: should they be forced to undergo sensitivity > re-education — or perhaps attend a “Gay Pride” parade? > > Where will the PC “hate speech” enforcement stop? AP recently reported: > > “When a few classmates razzed *Rebekah Rice* about her Mormon upbringing > with questions such as, “Do you have 10 moms?” she shot back: *“That’s so > gay.”* > > “Those three words landed the high school freshman in the > principal’s office and resulted in a lawsuit that raises this question: *When > do playground insults used every day all over America cross the line into > hate speech that must be stamped out?”* > > The AP story points to the threat that official speech codes pose to > Americans’ most fundamental freedoms. Homosexual activists routinely and > outrageously blame Christian pro-family groups for violence against > homosexuals<http://americansfortruth.com/news/pam-spaulding-falsely-accuses-christians-of-inciting-violence-but-what-about-her-own-behavior.html>, > and there are many on the Left who will go to extraordinary lengths to > turn any derogatory use of ‘gay” into an opportunity to spread their > pro-homosexual ideology. > > Coulter was joking. These activists are dead serious. Students and parents, > *take > note<http://americansfortruth.com/news/snipers-take-notelesbian-pam-spauldings-website-posts-violent-threat-against-labarbera.html> > *. > > *As a rule we do not, like **Fred > Phelps*<http://www.illinoisfamily.org/informed/contentview.asp?c=27785> > *, use the term “fag.”* *Coulter’s stunt was childish* and, despite her > protestations, she was clearly calling family man John Edwards a “faggot” — > even as she also poked fun at the Left’s quirky “hate” formula by which they > vilify their foes, then jump up and down when their own PC speech taboos are > violated. (Example: saying George Bush is like Hitler – NOT HATE; saying we > should love people practicing homosexual behavior but hate their sexual sin > — HATE.) Coulter’s reference point was *Grey’s Anatomy* star Isaiah > Washington<http://lifeandstylemag.hollywood.com/2007/01/life_style_exclusive_isaiah_wa.php>, > who, after publicity grew about his calling a homosexual co-star a > “faggot,” apologized and checked himself into rehab for a “psychological > assessment.” > > People involved in homosexuality should not be the object of taunts or > hatred, and Christians, especially, are called to apply the Biblical command > to speak the truth *in love*. We are called even to love our enemies so > name-calling simply is not an option. (I confess that I once called > homosexual blogger *Joe Brummer*, who is obsessed with AFTAH, a “twit,” > but you might too if you read the tripe that he puts out on an almost daily > basis. (A recent Brummer blog > entry<http://joebrummer.com/WordPress/?p=578#comments>accuses Sonja Dalton > and me of being “extremely responsible [sic] for the > climate of violence that plagues gays and lesbians.”) > > *“That’s So Gay”* > > The reality we face is that many on the pro-homosexual side, even as they > recklessly smear committed Christians as bigots and haters *(and murderers > for what we believe!)*, want to define any negative use of the word “gay” > as evidence of “hate speech” requiring punitive and corrective action. The > AP story continues: > > Testifying last week about the 2002 incident, Rice, now 18, said that when > she uttered those words, she was not referring to anyone’s sexual > orientation. She said the phrase meant: *“That’s so stupid, that’s so > silly, that’s so dumb.”* > > > > But school officials say they took a strict stand against the putdown after > two boys were paid to beat up a gay student the year before. > > > > “The district has a statutory duty to protect gay students from > harassment,” the district’s lawyers argued in a legal brief. *“In > furtherance of this goal, prohibition of the phrase ‘That’s so gay’ … was a > reasonable regulation.”* > > So many questions about this AP article (which you can read in full by > clicking HERE <http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1172657000992>): > > 1. Since when was it decided that “hate speech” must be “stamped out” > in the USA, as AP reporter Lisa > Leff<http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1172657000992>so cavalierly > asserts? I thought we had something called the First > Amendment<http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/funddocs/billeng.htm>. > Maybe Ms. Leff needs to go back to school to study it. > 2. Who could agree on what constitutes “hate speech,” anyway? Are we > going to get our definitions from GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education > Network), whose founder, *Kevin Jennings*, certainly has evinced clear > “hatred” toward religious > conservatives<http://americansfortruth.com/news/in-honor-of-glsens-no-name-calling-week.html>? > Lesbian blogger Pam “Jeebus” > Spaulding<http://americansfortruth.com/news/pam-spaulding-falsely-accuses-christians-of-inciting-violence-but-what-about-her-own-behavior.html>calls > me and other Christians who oppose homosexuality the “AmTaliban,” and > I think she’s a hateful anti-religious bigot. How about letting the free > market of ideas sort that one out — not some school bureaucrat or judge? If > a kid is taunting another kid, it’s one thing — all students must be > protected regardless of criteria — but if a student is overheard using > “gay” > in a negative context, *that must not be used as an excuse to > call in the Thought Police.* > 3. As we recently noted, it’s OK to be “anti-gay” as long as you don’t > hate > people<http://americansfortruth.com/news/its-ok-to-be-anti-gay-as-long-as-you-dont-hate-people.html>. > *Homosexual behavior is destructive, wrong and — most important — > changeable.* “Gay” is not a person. So while I would not encourage my > kids to say ”that’s so gay” – there are better ways to make your point — > *it’s almost refreshing that the word “gay” still has a stigma attached > to it among so many youth.* (That does not mean that you don’t fully > punish thugs who prey on weak kids — you just do it without promoting any > agendas.) Polls show that young people are increasingly pro-”gay”-agenda on > issues like “same-sex marriage.” Nevertheless, despite years of > brainwashing > by public schools and popular culture designed to re-program their minds > into thinking that “gay” is good (or at least no big deal), most American > young people recognize, deep in their God-informed consciences, that > homosexuality is unnatural and wrong. It’s sort of like liberal adults who > take pride in their ”tolerance” until they are confronted with the reality > of what homosexuals actually do (perversion) — and they react with disgust > (the “ick” factor) like everyone else. > 4. *Remember, this is not about being fair or neutral:* most homosexual > activists and many liberals openly ridicule > EX-”gays,”<http://www.exgaywatch.com/wp/> and > some are even trying to ban therapy groups from helping people change > unwanted homosexual attractions. Based on the preposterous “gay” arguments > equating conservatives with the KKK because we oppose homosexuality, you’d > better believe these activists will try to restrict more and more “hateful” > speech as their power grows (example: > Canada<http://americansfortruth.com/news/canadian-city-councillor-fined-1000-for-saying-homosexuality-%e2%80%9cnot-normal-or-natural%e2%80%9d.html>). > > 5. Back to the Thought Police: once the GLSEN/”gay” agenda gets rolling > in schools, what kinds of corrective measures would be meted out to the kid > “caught” saying, “That’s so gay”? Surely part of the punishment will > include > being taught that *homosexuals* (they wouldn’t say that word, which is > also fast on its way to being banished) are a “civil rights” minority, etc. > — i.e., another excuse to foist one-sided pro-homosexual > propaganda on kids. > 6. *Rebekah Rice’s dad is to be commended* for standing up to the > education establishment, which apparently was watching Rebekah closer than > other students. Isn’t that a microcosm of what’s wrong with the “hate > speech” concept? *Whoever is in charge gets to decide which speech will > be the target of censorship or “correction.”* Liberals > dominate positions of power in public schools, libraries, big city > governments, and the corporate H.R. departments that run ”diversity” > programs. In schools, they will be tempted to abuse their power and impose > their ideology on children through speech-control. We have to fight them to > preserve freedom. > > > > On 10/13/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Tom, >> >> I watched Ann Coulter on O'Reilly the night that she made the comments. I >> thought O'Reilly was incorrect, and that Coulter was actually on point. >> Nothing that Coulter said was offensive. Nothing that Coulter said was >> "Anti-Gay". You need to listen and hear for yourself: >> >> >> http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2010/10/12/2010-10-12_ann_coulter_defends_tea_party_favorite_carl_paladinos_antigay_remarks_to_bill_or.html >> >> Please feel free to point out what it is specifically that think Coulter >> says, that could be construed as, "Anti-Gay". >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Tommy News <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> *Keith-* >>> ** >>> *If you believe that Coulter's anti-gay statements are "right on the >>> mark" then you are as anti-gay and homophobic as she is.* >>> >>> >>> *"Asked about the specifics of the speech - in which Paladino warned >>> against letting children be 'brainwashed' into thinking homosexuality is an >>> 'equally valid or successful option' - Coulter said the candidate was just >>> giving his socially conservative audience the (anti-gay) red meat it >>> wanted."* >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10/12/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Once again, Ann is right on the mark! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:39 PM, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> What's with the "Adam's Apple" closeup? >>>>> >>>>> Are you trying to say that Ann... is a male?..... (HAR) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 12, 3:04 pm, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > From Greg >>>>> > >>>>> > *? 2 ALL: ANN COULTER DEFENDS PALADINO'S ANTI-GAY REMARKS - WHAT ARE >>>>> YOUR >>>>> > COMMENTS?* >>>>> > >>>>> > *[image: Bill O"Reilly and Ann Coulter]* >>>>> > >>>>> > *(above): O'Reilly, Coulter* >>>>> >>>>> > *Video at **http://tinyurl.com/2c6t5sk*<http://tinyurl.com/2c6t5sk> >>>>> > >>>>> > ======= >>>>> > >>>>> > *Hi Team!* >>>>> > ** >>>>> > **? 2 ALL:* >>>>> > ** >>>>> > *ANN COULTER* >>>>> > ** >>>>> > *DEFENDS PALADINO'S* >>>>> > ** >>>>> > *ANTI-GAY REMARKS -* >>>>> > ** >>>>> > [image: Carl Paladino] >>>>> > >>>>> > *(above): Paladino prepares to speak to Hasidim* >>>>> > >>>>> > Jack Mirkinson reports: >>>>> > >>>>> > "Speaking to Bill O'Reilly on Fox News Monday, Coulter said she felt >>>>> the >>>>> > need to come to the Republican's defense after it seemed everyone >>>>> else had >>>>> > stopped backing him. >>>>> > >>>>> > "'I think someone on this network should [defend him]'" she said, >>>>> calling >>>>> > Paladino a 'great warrior' who wants to lower taxes. >>>>> > >>>>> > "Asked about the specifics of the speech - in which Paladino warned >>>>> against >>>>> > letting children be 'brainwashed' into thinking homosexuality is an >>>>> 'equally >>>>> > valid or successful option' - Coulter said the candidate was just >>>>> giving his >>>>> > socially conservative audience the red meat it wanted. >>>>> > >>>>> > "'He's speaking to Hasidim...it's like being in Chicago. You say, 'Go >>>>> Cubs,' >>>>> > she said." >>>>> > >>>>> > [image: coulter] >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > *Aerosmith's "Dude (Looks Like A Lady)" * >>>>> > >>>>> > *athttp://preview.tinyurl.com/ybcs77j* >>>>> > >>>>> > *Ann Coulter defends Carl Paladino's anti-gay remarks - what are your >>>>> > comments?* >>>>> > >>>>> > *Greg Dempsey* >>>>> >>>>> > *http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SECULARHUMANIST*< >>>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SECULARHUMANIST> >>>>> > *Voice of the People* >>>>> > >>>>> > *======* >>>>> > ** >>>>> > *Ann Coulter Defends Carl Paladino Over Anti-Gay Comments >>>>> > Huffington Post | Jack Mirkinson First Posted: 10-12-10 08:42 AM >>>>> > Updated: 10-12-10 12:52 PM* >>>>> > ** >>>>> > *Carl Paladino may not have many people sticking up for him after his >>>>> > anti-gay remarks before a group of Orthodox Jews on Sunday, but he >>>>> has at >>>>> > least one supporter: Ann Coulter.* >>>>> > ** >>>>> > *Coulter also claimed that Paladino had only been referring to "gay >>>>> > left-wing activists" in his speech, calling it "offensive" to suggest >>>>> > otherwise. "That was the only thing he was condemning," she said.* >>>>> > ** >>>>> > *"That's not all he did," O'Reilly countered.* >>>>> > ** >>>>> > *"It is all he did!" Coulter said.* >>>>> > ** >>>>> > *"I think everybody but you in the world agrees this ain't gonna help >>>>> the >>>>> > guy," O'Reilly told her. >>>>> >>>>> > * >>>>> > >>>>> > f086fc6f8490c925a1d2118e75c646cf.jpg >>>>> > 50KViewDownload >>>>> > >>>>> > coulter.jpg >>>>> > 56KViewDownload >>>>> > >>>>> > 1286808752-carl_paladino_hates_the_gays.jpg >>>>> > 79KViewDownload >>>>> > >>>>> > f086fc6f8490c925a1d2118e75c646cf.jpg >>>>> > 50KViewDownload >>>>> > >>>>> > 1286808752-carl_paladino_hates_the_gays.jpg >>>>> > 79KViewDownload >>>>> > >>>>> > coulter.jpg >>>>> > 56KViewDownload >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>> >>>>> * Visit our other community at >>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>> >>>> * Visit our other community at >>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. >>> Have a great day, >>> Tommy >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> >>> * Visit our other community at >>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> >> >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at >> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> > > > > -- > Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. > Have a great day, > Tommy > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at > http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
