dick cheney? dick armey? or our dick?
On Oct 14, 10:54 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Nom, > > With regard to Ann, I must have missed the time that you reference, > when Ann didn't nail the issue right square on the head, and call a spade a > spade. > > With regard to the Senator from Tel-Aviv, Joe Lieberman......He has put > Israel's interests before our own way, way way too many times for my > tastes. We know where his loyalty is. > > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:21 AM, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ann... Ann.. Ann.... > > > You do have your head up your ass.... > > but like the proverbial clockon the wall, you do happen to tell the > > right time every so often.... > > I agee about Dick 'the blooming AssHole' Blumenthal.... although > > perhaps not on all of the same grounds as you..... > > > so.... I wonder what Ann thinks about Lyin' Joe Lieberman... > > aka the Bi-sexual Bi- partisan who screws both Democrats and > > Republicans... both up the Ass.... (HAR).... > > nominal9 > > > On Oct 13, 8:16 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > *There's a Reason They Call Him 'Dick'* > > > by Ann Coulter > > > Posted 10/13/2010 ET > > > Updated 10/13/2010 ET > > > >http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=39409 > > > > If the Bush administration ever treated terrorism suspects the way > > > Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal treats law-abiding > > citizens > > > and small businesses, even conservatives would have blanched. > > > > This activist, interventionist Democrat -- like his identical, slightly > > less > > > oily twin, Eliot Spitzer -- decided at age 5 he was going to be a U.S. > > > senator and then the first Jewish president. And he doesn't care how many > > > lives he has to destroy to get there. > > > > Currently, Blumenthal is running for the U.S. Senate against Linda > > McMahon > > > in Connecticut. He must be stopped. > > > > Even his ideological ally, The New York *Times*, thinks he must be > > stopped. > > > That paper ran a front-page expose on Blumenthal's lies about having > > served > > > in Vietnam, violating a century-old Times tradition of never printing > > > information unflattering to a Democrat. > > > > Blumenthal apologized for lying about being in Vietnam, saying, "I take > > full > > > responsibility." Who else was he considering blaming? The voices in his > > > head? > > > > Among Blumenthal's taxpayer-funded citizen-persecution projects was the > > one > > > he waged against Gina Kolb, owner of Computer Plus Center in East > > Hartford. > > > > After selling $17.2 million worth of computers and servers to the state > > in > > > 2001, Kolb found herself being sued by Blumenthal for $1.75 million for > > > allegedly overcharging the state $500,000. > > > > Publicity-whore Blumenthal sent out an accusatory press release about > > Kolb, > > > saying: "No supplier should be permitted to shortchange or overcharge the > > > state without severe consequences." > > > > Soon thereafter, Kolb was arrested at her home on seven first-degree > > larceny > > > charges, courtesy of Connecticut's crazily hyperactive attorney general. > > > > Wonder why you have a $4 billion deficit, Nutmeggers? Blumenthal's > > endless > > > investigations into responsible, law-abiding citizens like Kolb have now > > > cost more than the entire Iraq War. (And that's just the cost of the > > paper > > > for Blumenthal's 12 billion press releases!) > > > > A court dismissed all charges against Kolb and her company in 2008. But > > not > > > before this female businesswoman had her company completely shattered by > > the > > > pathologically ambitious attorney general. > > > > I'm sorry, I know you need to be on television every single day, Dick, > > but > > > that's not enough of a reason to destroy innocent citizens' lives, much > > less > > > use taxpayer money to do so. > > > > Kolb was far from the only innocent citizen persecuted by Blumenthal. The > > > reason we know her story is that, instead of moving as far away from > > > Connecticut as she could, Kolb turned around and sued the state for > > > violating her constitutional rights. > > > > The jury agreed, awarding her $18 million for Blumenthal's "pattern of > > > conduct" that destroyed Kolb's business and impugned her integrity. > > > > Noticeably, the attorney general who spends most of his waking hours > > phoning > > > reporters, holding press conferences and issuing press releases did not > > make > > > a peep about Kolb's total vindication in court, despite his having > > earlier > > > blackened her name. Perhaps he was busy attending a fake Vietnam > > veterans' > > > reunion that day. > > > > To the contrary, Blumenthal continued using the power of his office to > > > persecute Kolb. This is the problem with government officials using > > taxpayer > > > money to further their own political ambitions: No one could tell him to > > cut > > > his losses and stop harassing Kolb. > > > > Blumenthal filed a blizzard of motions -- at taxpayer expense -- > > appealing > > > the jury's verdict in favor of Kolb. One of them finally succeeded in > > > getting a judge to reduce the damages to Kolb, who presumably is now > > living > > > in Hawaii under an assumed name so Blumenthal doesn't start making crank > > > calls to her. > > > > (She should go to Vietnam! Blumenthal will never find her there!) > > > > Connecticut taxpayers spent millions of dollars harassing this innocent > > > businesswoman, successfully destroying a profitable, job-creating > > computer > > > company in the state and one law-abiding taxpayer in the process. Thanks, > > > Dick! > > > > Blumenthal's 24-hour publicity office managed to produce a gleaming press > > > release on the reduction of Kolb's damages award, in which he vowed to > > > "continue fighting to overturn this verdict." > > > > Asked by Charles Kochakian of the New Haven *Register *about the case and > > > whether Blumenthal ever released a statement when a victim of his legal > > > harassment was vindicated, Blumenthal essentially said: No one is ever > > > vindicated. Just because no wrongdoing was found, he said, doesn't mean > > > wrongdoing didn't occur. > > > > Welcome to Connecticut, where you're guilty until proved innocent (and > > you > > > can never be proved innocent). > > > > Most shockingly, Blumenthal said he would never issue a press release > > about > > > one of his publicly accused targets being vindicated because "new > > evidence > > > may well emerge." > > > > "New evidence may well emerge" that Dick Blumenthal is a child molesting > > ax > > > murderer. But until it does, no one has a right to say so. Hello? ACLU? > > > Heard of Dick Blumenthal? > > > > Everyone in Connecticut knows Blumenthal's name, largely on account of > > his > > > daily press conferences for nearly two decades as attorney general, > > > announcing lawsuits to combat every minor inconvenience. Arby's served > > > jalapeno poppers at 114 degrees? Blumenthal is holding a press conference > > at > > > noon! > > > > This hyperactive, publicity-mad lunatic is constantly announcing new > > > lawsuits far beyond the purview of his office, like some New England > > version > > > of Hugo Chavez. This won him the title: "Worst Attorney General in the > > > Country" from the Competitive Enterprise Institute. > > > > He's sued power companies for contributing to "global warming," asking > > the > > > courts to impose cap and trade -- a bill so absurd neither Obama nor the > > > Democratic Senate will touch it. > > > > He's sued gun companies, trying to hold them responsible for criminal > > acts > > > by third parties involving guns. > > > > He's sued tobacco companies so he could extort millions of dollars for > > his > > > old law firm and other legal cronies overseeing the shakedown -- I mean > > > "settlement." > > > > Blumenthal is now in a tight race with Linda McMahon for the U.S. Senate. > > I > > > understand why Connecticut would like to get rid of him, but that's no > > > reason to foist this menace on the rest of the country. How about sending > > > him to Vietnam? > > > -- > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > * Visit our other community > > athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
