You are not looking at it objectively you are looking at it through the vaseline lens of the state controlled media
he went to law school and he could not name the 5 liberties in the first amendment and he thought the phrase separation of church and state is in it; it isn't On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:24 PM, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote: > Still..... With Christine O'Donnell (or McDonnell?) as his > competition.... how "Loony" can Coons really look?... I mean... that > comparison would make anyone appear relatively normal.....Hard to deny > altogether, don't you think?... I mean, loooking at it objectively.... > > > On Oct 19, 4:04 pm, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://teapartiers.blogspot.com/2010/10/toe-tapping-in-delaware.html > > > > Toe tapping in Delaware< > http://teapartiers.blogspot.com/2010/10/toe-tapping-in-delaware.html> > > 2010's mid-term elections have seen a number of female challengers to > male > > incumbents observe that these male politicos are remarkably sniveling, > > whiny, worm-tongued and unmanly. And indeed many male politicians are: > > Congressman Anthony Weiner is one part each Barney Fife, Eddie Haskell > and > > a weasel and Senator Harry Reid is one part Wally Cox and one part > > dessicated cadaver. > > > > And then there's Delaware Senatorial candidate Chris Coons. That voice. > > One part Wally Cox and one part Dana Carvey's Lyle the effiminate > > heterosexual. That voice sets off my gaydar even as his bald blandness, > > mental conventionality and ethical cravenness make him physically and > > personallyrepellent. > > > > The poor little career bureaucrat whined at his debate against challenger > > Christine O'Donnell at Widener Law School for the moderators to protect > him. > > He was so ignorant that even when O'Donnell questioned him about whether > > the phrase "separation of church and state" appears in the Constitution > he > > kept insisting it is in the First Amendment. (It isn't, and some of the > > so-called "liberal" media covering it are so dumb that they didn't > realize > > that either. though it is a common trope in tea party, Constitutionalist > and > > conservative discussions.) > > > > Like the C-Span debate, which O'Donnell won even though it was 3 against > one > > (Coons, Wolf Blitzer, and an ignorant and smug female journalist who no > one > > had ever heard of before and no one will ever here of again, brought in > just > > for her body parts), O'Donnell remained composed and in control. This > > debate was more like 5 against one, with questions being submitted by > local > > journalists from the "Newcastle Pennysaver" and the "Sussex County > Shopper," > > on such extremely relevant topics as whether Congress should have to > declare > > war against Mexican pirates and drug lords in order for federal agents to > > apprehend them, and whether the tea party's platform is mainly to repeal > the > > 14th, 16th and 17th amendments (this latter issue being a complete > > fabrication or delusion on the part of the PennySaver journalist -- no > > significant discussion of such occurs in the tea party movement). > > Apparently in the offices of the "Dover Gazette and Fish-wrapper" the > fact > > that the exploding deficits and centrally planned interest rates jiggered > by > > the Federal Reserve System and the federal government to finance their > > expansion of power are leading to a great depression and perpetual debt > > slavery for Americans and their children and grandchildren is not an > issue. > > In other words, like Coons, they are too dumb or craven to grasp our > > plight. They still think if you inflate or tax or borrow a dollar out of > > the economy to fund porkulus, you will not destroy the jobs that dollar > had > > been supporting. That is, they are the people who got us into the > situation > > we are in. > > > > Back to Loony Coons. It's not just that he is dumb, a bot programmed > long > > ago by some Marxist professor, unable to fathom how our predicament and > the > > looming disaster was caused by the government intervention he wants more > of. > > It's not just that he is in fact a profiteer off the government he wants > to > > expand, both as a career politician and as an Al Gore style war profiteer > in > > the Green war on industry. He is also unmanly, unlikely to have the > cojones > > to face down the establishment, the Obama regime, or the crises headed > for > > us. He is indeed Harry Reid's lap dog, and a fixed one at that. > > > > -- > > Please Note: If you hit "*REPLY*", your message will be sent to > > *everyone*on this mailing list ( > > [email protected]) > > This message was sent by bruce ([email protected]) from The > Delaware > > Campaign for Liberty Meetup Group <http://www.meetup.com/ronpaul-132/>. > > To learn more about bruce, visit his/her member > > profile<http://www.meetup.com/ronpaul-132/members/10075860/> > > To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click > > here<http://www.meetup.com/ronpaul-132/settings/> > > > > Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York 10163-4668 | > > [email protected] > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
