False twisted pretzel logic. No dice, no points to Dick.
On 11/1/10, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > And the support of the people of NY state is what? Do you have numbers > as to what support this has? > > Also remember that members of legislative bodies represent their > constituents. Suppose the constituents supported civil unions but not > marriage, something which is common across the country. If the civil > union gave you the benefits of marriage, why would you give a damn. And > if the constituents supported civil unions but not marriage, then that > is what their senators should vote. Did you ask why the 8 Dems voted > against? If they had not voted against it would have passed 32-30. > Blame them! > > On 11/01/2010 02:01 PM, Tommy News wrote: >> On December 2nd, 2009, by a vote of 38 >> Nays to 24 Yeas, The New York State Senate Voted Against Marriage >> Equality. >> Every single Republican and eight Democrats voted for discrimination. >> >> >> On 11/1/10, dick thompson<[email protected]> wrote: >>> What stand-alone bill did the Republicans vote for discrimination. If >>> you are still harping on DADT, they should have noted against that >>> debacle. The garbage that was tacked onto that bill made it imperative >>> to see it did not get passed. >>> >>> If you want repeal of DADT passed, then put up a bill that repeals >>> DADT. Also make sure that you also change the UCMJ as well. As it >>> stands now if all you do is let the judge say DADT is bad, then it >>> defaults to the older legislation in UCMJ which actually does not even >>> include DADT but only dismissal. Stop playing stupid games with the >>> crap. Pitiful! Also remember who first passed and signed DADT. And >>> no, it was not the Republicans. Thank your hero, Bubba, and his crew >>> that were in charge. >>> >>> On 11/01/2010 01:21 PM, Tommy News wrote: >>>> Every single Republican voted for discrimination. >>>> Every single one. No exceptions. >>>> >>>> Do NOT vote for a Republican obstructionist under ANY circumstances. >>>> >>>> A Republican Mammoth: >>>> >>>> http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_TvDzGuSPTho/SjJj7Ml2M3I/AAAAAAAAAZo/gDbDiX5rq5M/s400/GOP+mammoth+large.jpg >>>> >>>> On 11/1/10, Keith In Tampa<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> -- >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>> For options& help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>> >>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> -- >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> For options& help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> >>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. Have a great day, Tommy -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
