Preparation H

On Nov 3, 10:24 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
> Liberty Is the Theme, AgainNovember 3, 2010
> byJeffrey Tucker
> Once again, voters went to the polls to reject overweening government, 
> responding to waves of rhetoric that decried the government takeover of 
> health care, the bailouts and spending, and the arrogance of power. And 
> again, domestic economic issues dominated. And so the Obama regime, as the 
> Republicans have started calling it, got a much-deserved smack on the nose.
> Strangely, it was a similar set of themes that brought Obama to power: 
> resentment against the outrageous power abuses and wars of the Bush regime, 
> and fear that the Republican Party represented more of the same. Looking back 
> further, it was the same theme that brought Bush to power. He ran with the 
> promise of a more humble foreign policy, while decrying taxes and big 
> government. We could keep going back and back this way, to 1994, 1992, and 
> throughout the eighties, and back through the seventies, and back all the way 
> to 1932 and even to Wilson s promise to keep us out of World War I. Voters 
> keep pulling the lever against the state and yet the state marches ever 
> onward, growing bigger and more abusive all the time.
> How can we account for this? FollowingRothbard,Nock,Van Creveld,Chodorov, 
> andOppenheimer, what the voters are voting on is not the state but merely a 
> false front.
> If the state is a giant building, the office holders we vote for are merely 
> the facade. We are given buckets of paint to paint this facade red or blue or 
> some combination of the two colors, but this has very little to do with what 
> goes on inside. Our job is to argue and vote over which color we want it to 
> be but never presume to have an influence over its actual affairs.
> If we want to truly understand the state, and not just its appearances and 
> its periodic election frenzies, we need to consider that the modern state is 
> very different from the medieval or ancient state, which were personal 
> states, inseparable from the ruler. Modern states are impersonal entities 
> that have a life apart from their temporary office holders and spokesmen. If 
> the Congress, Presidency, and Supreme Court were all put on a slow boat to 
> China, for example, the state would endure and continue as always. Its 
> machinery consists almost entirely in gears and parts that are not subject to 
> referendums and democratic mandates.
> This is why these elections never really accomplish what voters what them to 
> accomplish. Elections deal with superficial issues, not fundamental ones. And 
> isn t this obvious just from listening to the victory speeches last night? I 
> actually heard one Republican going on about the need for a line item veto 
> and a balanced budget and a strong defense in this dangerous world. It was 
> like 30 years ago all over again. The political class is strangely 
> disconnected from the actual workings of the state.
> Anyway, all these thoughts come from the great works on the state linked 
> above. They are the books we need in order to truly understand and avoid 
> getting tricked by this ridiculous spectacle every two and four 
> years.http://blog.mises.org/14481/liberty-is-the-theme-again/

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to