Pardon me while I yawn.
-------------------------------------------

Three pages of whining does not a yawn make.

Too funny

Try to recall republicans help both houses for 12 years.  You just
lasted four, and the senate is a GOP gimme in 2012.

Some yawn


On Nov 8, 8:28 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Oh, Republicans made promises. They issued the "Contract with America." They 
> talked about reducing government. They preached the gospel of free markets. 
> They used libertarian rhetoric. But then they did nothing to meaningfully 
> reduce the size and scope of government.
> "Fast forward to 2010. Republicans have made their promises. They have issued 
> their "Pledge to America." They have talked about reducing government. They 
> have preached the gospel of free markets. They have used libertarian 
> rhetoric. And once again they will do nothing to meaningfully reduce the size 
> and scope of government."Republican Déjà Vuby Laurence M. VanceSo, the 
> Republicans regained control of the House of Representatives in the midterm 
> elections and gained sixseats in the Senate. If you remember, or care, 
> Republicans lost control of both the House and Senate for the last two years 
> of George W. Bush’s disastrous presidency and suffered even more defeats in 
> the 2008 election. The Republican margin of victory in the House in this 
> election was the largest shift in power since the Democrats won a 91-seat 
> majority 1948.
> Pardon me while I yawn.
> I remember all too well in 1994 when the Republicans regained control of not 
> only the House, but the Senate as well. I remember sitting in my car and 
> anxiously listening to Rush Limbaugh’s first radio show after the election. I 
> remember speaking with my Republican congressman at the time on a local 
> call-in radio talk show. I asked him when the new Republican-controlled 
> Congress would begin repealing some of the legislation passed during the 
> first two years of Clinton’s reign. The congressman told me he would have to 
> stand in line to introduce such legislation because of everything the 
> Republicans had planned.
> Republicans managed to stay in power throughout the rest of Clinton’s 
> presidency. But what did we get for it? Did Republicans repeal the Family and 
> Medical Leave Act? Did they eliminate foreign aid? Did they repeal the Brady 
> Handgun Violence Prevention Act? Did they lower overall federal spending? Did 
> they repeal the Motor Voter Act? Did they eliminate any substantial business 
> regulations? Did they repeal the Violence Against Women Act? Did they cut 
> Social Security and Medicare? Did they repeal the Earned Income Credit? Did 
> they eliminate any federal agencies or programs? Did they repeal any 
> significant pieces of legislation passed during any previous administration? 
> Did they shrink the U.S. empire?
> Oh, Republicans made promises. They issued the "Contract with America." They 
> talked about reducing government. They preached the gospel of free markets. 
> They used libertarian rhetoric. But then they did nothing to meaningfully 
> reduce the size and scope of government.
> Fast forward to 2010. Republicans have made their promises. They have issued 
> their "Pledge to America." They have talked about reducing government. They 
> have preached the gospel of free markets. They have used libertarian 
> rhetoric. And once again they will do nothing to meaningfully reduce the size 
> and scope of government.
> Oh, but Republicans are going to repeal Obamacare. Yea, and replace it 
> withRepublicancare. If Republicans are so concerned about socialized medicine 
> and government takeovers of health care, then why haven’t they tried to 
> repeal Medicare? Is it not socialized medicine? Is it not a government 
> takeover of health care? But not only do Republicans accept the legitimacy of 
> Medicare, they added to it aprescription drug plan. And now they propose in 
> their Pledge to "support Medicare for seniors," even criticizing Obamacare 
> for cutting Medicare.
> I am suffering from Republican Déjà Vu. When I look at Republicans in 2010 – 
> the year they issued their "Pledge to America" and won big in a midterm 
> election – I hear them uttering the same lies about fiscal responsibility and 
> a smaller, less intrusive government that they did in 1994 – the year they 
> issued their "Contract with America" and won big in a midterm election. When 
> I write about Republicans I feel as though I could just take something I 
> wrote fifteen years ago and change the date and some names and it would sound 
> like I wrote it yesterday.
> While doing some remodeling recently, I discovered in my files some 
> long-forgotten letters to the editor about the Republicans I had written in 
> 1994 and 1995 that were published in the conservative weeklyHuman Events.
> I am reproducing them here exactly as they appeared. I have given the dates 
> of publication in parentheses. The titles and material in brackets were 
> supplied byHuman Events.King Commission Funding Proves Phillips Correct (July 
> 1994)I was outraged to read in your June 3 issue (see "Senate Votes Millions 
> for King Commission," page 4) about the support of Bob Dole and Jack Kemp for 
> the funding of the Martin Luther King Holiday Commission. The apostate 
> Republicans who were afraid to stand up to the NAACP and the Congressional 
> Black Caucus for fear of being called racist should join the Democratic Party 
> where they belong.After almost unanimously confirming all of Clinton’s 
> radical appointments, including Janet Reno, I didn’t think the Republicans 
> could do any worse until reading about the King holiday commission.It is also 
> interesting that in the same issue, Howard Phillips, chairman of the 
> Conservative Caucus, exposed the GOP for being full of "Big Government" 
> conservatives (see page 12). Although certainly better than Slick Willie, a 
> vote for Republicans like Dole and Kemp is a vote for four more years of 
> George Bush.What’s Conservative About Foreign Aid? (November 1994)Although I 
> was not surprised, I was nevertheless still appalled at the passage of the 
> Foreign Aid Appropriations bill (HR 4426). But I was even more incensed to 
> see in your August 19 issue [see HUMAN EVENTS rollcall, page 23] that 
> Republicans like Representatives Bob Dornan (Calif.), Newt Gingrich (Ga.), 
> Bill McCollum (Fla.) and other conservatives would vote to spend the 
> taxpayers’ money in such a reckless manner. Let any basket-case foreign 
> country send out an appeal for funds to the American people and they wouldn’t 
> receive enough money to pay for the postage. Leave it to the U.S. Congress, 
> however, to dole out the hard-earned money confiscated from the American 
> people.If any member of Congress or any U.S. citizen desire to enrich another 
> country instead of investing in his own, let him be the first to write out a 
> personal check. Foreign aid is the most obscene waste of the taxpayers’ money 
> in history. The Republican "Contract with America" should include a provision 
> to immediately eliminate all foreign aid. Anything less is just business as 
> usual for what [nationally syndicated columnist] Samuel Francis calls the 
> Stupid Party.Why is GOP Leaving Liberal Statism Intact? (April 1995)The 
> Republicans are celebrating their first 100 days in power. But what have they 
> actually done? Trumpeting how their block grants to the states will result in 
> more dollars for school lunch programs instead of abolishing the program 
> altogether is a typical example.Where are the bills on Clinton’s desk to 
> repeal the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Clean Air Act of 
> 1990, the Civil Rights Act of 1991, and the Family and Medical Leave Act of 
> 1993? Why isn’t there legislation piled to the ceiling on Clinton’s desk to 
> repeal CAFE standards, the freon ban, the Brady Bill, and all other statist 
> legislation?Every bill that Clinton vetoes will be another nail in his coffin 
> at election time, if the Democrats don’t drop him first. And furthermore, if 
> House Speaker Newt Gingrich desires to be a conservative leader, then perhaps 
> he should publicly repent for voting for the Americans with Disabilities Act, 
> congressional pay raises and bouncing checks at the House bank.What 
> Republican Revolution? (October 1995)Donald Lambro’s article about the 
> Republican budget that appeared in the August 25 issue of HUMAN EVENTS 
> inadvertently exposes the failure of the Republican revolution. According to 
> Lambro, "government spending is still going to grow in the years to come, up 
> to nearly $2 trillion by the beginning of the next century." Instead of 
> eliminating failed liberal programs like Medicaid, Medicare and welfare, the 
> Republicans want to increase spending on Medicaid by $329 billion, Medicare 
> by $675 billion and welfare by $346 billion. The Republicans are actually 
> bragging about how they plan to increase the transfer of even more taxpayer 
> dollars to those on the federal dole. In the same issue of HUMAN EVENTS, it 
> was also reported that the House rejected cuts in the NEA and CPB. In 
> addition to this, our troops are still overseas, foreign aid is still on the 
> rise and the power of the FBI, BATF, OSHA, EPA, and FEMA is still increasing. 
> The Republican revolution will do down in history as the revolution that 
> wasn’t.Two things should be abundantly clear: Republicans haven’t changed and 
> my basic criticisms of Republicans haven’t changed. Yet, in the recent 
> election, millions of conservatives went to the polls hoping, and millions of 
> Christians went to the polls praying, that perhaps this time the Republicans 
> would not betray and disappoint them. Let’s hope and pray they didn’t hold 
> their breath.
> The Republican Party cannot be reformed. As theparty of Lincoln, it was 
> doomed from the beginning. It is the party ofwar,plunder,big 
> government,hypocrisy, andcrony 
> capitalism.http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance215.html

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to