I wonder how many other countries knew that our cybersecurity was a joke?

http://tinyurl.com/2av3rnl
NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT: F-35 STEALTH FIGHTER SPY COVER-UP

November 3rd, 2010
<http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2010/11/03/national-security-alert-f-35-stealth-fig?tempskin=basic>

*By Gordon Duff*


F-35 Joint Strike Fighter worthless?

*“WIKI” STYLE ESPIONAGE LANDS $300 BILLION DOLLAR SUPER-PLANE PLANS*

*“Another spy disaster like Pollard, shoved under the rug too long due to
pressure from the powerful Israeli lobby.”*

On April 21, 2009, the Department of Defense announced the theft of 1.5
terabytes of data on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the platform meant give
the United States and her allies air superiority for the next 40 years. In a
flash, all that was gone, $300 billion dollars of funding down the drain,
every system, defense, offense, stealth, everything needed to build one or
shoot it down, all gone. Day one, China was accused but it wasn’t China, it
wasn’t Iran, it wasn’t Pakistan. The theft left a clear signature, one
identical to the data Wikileaks has been receiving, sources inside the
Pentagon repeating the actions of Israeli-Soviet spy, Jonathan Pollard. As
vital as the F-35 is to America’s defense, Pollard’s triumph on behalf of
Soviet Russia and Israel dwarfs the current espionage coup.

*Since the 2009 announcement, there has been nothing but silence.*

When the theft was announced, Pentagon “damage control” went into action
immediately branding the disaster as “unimportant” while scrambling to look
for any possible way to “put the toothpaste back into the tube.” What
Secretary Gates came up with was a simple denial and to pretend it never
happened. With the continual efforts by the Israeli government to secure the
release of master spy Jonathan Pollard, a “witch hunt” for another Israeli
spy would endanger America’s hopes of winning a settlement between Israel
and the Palestinians.

There was no real question, this was another Israeli operation, their
“signature” was all over it.

*“AN UNPRECEDENTED DISASTER”*

What did America lose? 15 years of research and development? That doesn’t
come close. Key components of the F-35, from stealth materials, flight and
weapons systems, to tens of thousands of man-hours of systems programming
are now “out there,” available to any potential rival, military or
commercial. At best, it could be considered a $300 billion dollar bank
robbery, by American standards, nothing new in today’s financial world.

*Another spy disaster like Pollard, shoved under the rug too long due to
pressure from the powerful Israeli lobby.*

At worst, nations whose defense capabilities were decades behind the US can
now be at par, as the F-35 was estimated to be “air superiority capable”
until at least 2040. Data stolen could make production of a comparable
aircraft possible in as little as 36 months, particularly with several
projects in the offing, Russia/India and in China, each of which are capable
of quickly adapting upgraded systems.

The JSF (Joint Strike Fighter) in its three variants, conventional
takeoff/landing (CTOL, carrier variant (CV) and short takeoff/vertical
landing (STOLV), are scheduled for production through 2026 with estimates of
service life until 2060 and beyond. Export versions of the F-35, “detuned”
are available for American allies, NATO and Israel. The F-35 delivers more
“punch” per dollar than any current “legacy” fighter by a margin of as much
as 8 to 1.

*AIR DEFENSE VULNERABILITY*

*(Crappy video inserted here - made up of pieces of old clips.)*

In March, 1999, on the 4th day of American involvement in the Bosnian war,
Serbian forces shot down an F-117 stealth bomber using a Soviet SA 300 air
defense system with radar modifications based on data secured through
espionage.

Data on the resonant frequencies of the materials and surfaces of the F-117
made it possible for radar to, not only detect a plane previously believed
“invisible’ at a range of 13 kilometers, but to successfully destroy one, an
embarrassment the US feels the sting of even today.

The stolen data on the F-35 covers more than simple materials but all
jamming and other defensive systems and performance characteristics. Air
defense systems can now be tuned specifically to find only the F-35 if so
required.

*THE TRAIL OF THE SNAIL*

Wikileaks are called “leaks.” Julian Assange darts from country to country,
hotel to TV studio, always ahead of the security forces hunting him down, a
veritable “Nordic” bin Laden. Newspapers are peppered with photographs of a
boyish face in the uniform of the American army, identified as the potential
“leaker.” The 46,000 intelligence/counter-intelligence officers of the
Department of Defense, supplemented by the FBI and 16 other agencies and 40
other departments, more “bodies” than currently serve in Afghanistan, we are
told, are unable to rein in this “dangerous duo.”

Documents by the hundreds of thousands are leaked, upon qualified
examination, showing careful screening with many documents edited and more
selected out of series with careful gaps and omissions. A single
non-commissioned officer, watched 24 hours a day by tens of thousands of
security officers and threatened with life in prison, is an unlikely
suspect. However, there has been no mention of any others nor has there been
a mention of an investigation of any kind. In fact, there seems to me no
attempt whatsoever to curtail these current leaks.

What does this tell us?

*WHEN IS A LEAK “HACKING” AND WHEN IS HACKING A “LEAK” AND WHAT IS
“ESPIONAGE?”*

It was never announced when, exactly, the theft of the F-35 data occurred.
The press release was April 21. 2009, long enough after President Bush left
office for the blame to evade his administration, one infamous for “leaks”
such as the “Scooter” Libby (Liebowitz) “outing” of CIA nuclear
proliferation specialist Valerie Plame.

Despite the “cute” attempt by the Department of Defense and Secretary Gates
to refer to espionage as “hacking,” there is nothing either innocent or
harmless about it. As all data is formatted for electronic media and secured
by firewalls and passwords, all espionage is “hacking.”

The difference between “leaking” and “spying” is semantics. The goal is the
same, destruction of the defense capabilities of the United States, except
“spying” pays better.

The people responsible for each, particularly when they access the same
systems and overcome the same roadblocks, all requiring the same physical
access, are one in the same.

Those who “leak” perform an identical task to those who spy.

Those who leak, those who have leaked appear to be, to any reasonable
person, exactly the same people who are spying now and who were supporting
Pollard.

The first place we look, before new Russian, Indian, Iranian or Chinese
version of the F-35 take flight or our first F-35 meets a fiery end is
Israel. No Chinese or Pakistani’s or Iranians have gained by the F-35
espionage “clone” operations known as “Wikileaks.”

Assange is a recipient. He may well be a “dupe.”

The group rifling the “underwear drawers” of the Pentagon may well, at
times, be pranksters pulling America’s tail, Pentagon insiders all.

They are also spies.

-###-

*By Gordon Duff*
http://www.veteranstoday.com:80/2010/11/02/national-security-alert-f-35-stealth-fighter-spy-cover-up/<http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/11/02/national-security-alert-f-35-stealth-fighter-spy-cover-up/>



©2010 by thepeoplesvoice.org •

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted articles and information
about environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic,
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. This news and information is
displayed without profit for educational purposes, in accordance with, Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107 <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml> of
the US Copyright Law. Thepeoplesvoice.org is a non-advocacy internet web
site, edited by non-affiliated U.S. citizens. editor<[email protected]>

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

<<image001.png>>

Reply via email to