could care less, I have no right to tell you what to do, just what you CAN'T do here. And that is a very short list with maligning (of ANY nature) kids topping the list followed by overt threats against anyone. Merc did BOTH. / Mark
I still say that you are being "egged on" and railroaded in your opinions by others who are not necessarily "honest brokers", Mark. I have done enough to at least raise the possibility that you acted perhaps rashly and in error... I hope you take the cue.... nominal9 On Nov 21, 3:07 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > ""I believe Merc explained that she mistook Cold Water to be another > poster (using a fictitious screen name) with whm Merc has a history on > the topic of Children and abusive names being applied to some of > them...."" > > And that is my or Cold Waters problem because ....?? > > Merc particularly takes umbrage at people who use the term > "retard" to refer to some children.... > > Some kids... doing away with Political Correctness and all the shit it > entails... are Retarded Mentally (as are some adults). Is this not true ?? > > .The "folks" on that other (ABC) Political > Forum Board apparently gave Merc quite an abusive and tough time with > the "retard" bit... ( I wasn't there but so I've heard). Personally, I > don't get that insulted about the term "retard" if it is used in a > non- abusive manner and I would not condone censoring it in any case, > even if it were.... > > I am not responsible for what happens on other boards. I am not "censoring" > Merc. I am simply not allowing her to verbally abuse children on THIS forum. > > But, I think that Merc made a genuine mistake in "wrongly identifying > Cold Water" she acknowledged it and made her apology, on board.... as > a practical matter, I say that, at this point you do not have a leg to > stand on and that you are apparently maliciously banning Merc egged on > by those same actual (ABC Political Scrotum Boards) child abusers who > are the actual culprits.... > > I do not read any non-Google forums.. The people on those other boards did > not come on this Forum and Malign or threaten kids. The posts I pulled and > the reason Merc was banned came after her "apology" and after an off-board > warning was sent. > > Anyway, that is the situation....That " is what it is".... you don't > seem able either to recognize it or to amend your own error.... > > I made no "ERROR"... Kids are off-limits, Merc was informed of this and > continued with a threat against another members child... There is NO EXCUSE > for her behavior unless she would like to claim "Diminished Capacity". If > she did that then any promise she may make to clean up her act in this > regard would be tainted at best. > > and > Nominal9's Censorship Hall of Shame is looming nearer by the > moment..... > > I could care less, I have no right to tell you what to do, just what you > CAN'T do here. And that is a very short list with maligning (of ANY nature) > kids topping the list followed by overt threats against anyone. Merc did > BOTH. > > > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 1:37 PM, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote: > > I believe Merc explained that she mistook Cold Water to be another > > poster (using a fictitious screen name) with whm Merc has a history on > > the topic of Children and abusive names being applied to some of > > them.... Merc particularly takes umbrage at people who use the term > > "retard" to refer to some children.....I am telling you this as a > > point of information....The "folks" on that other (ABC) Political > > Forum Board apparently gave Merc quite an abusive and tough time with > > the "retard" bit... ( I wasn't there but so I've heard). Personally, I > > don't get that insulted about the term "retard" if it is used in a > > non- abusive manner and I would not condone censoring it in any case, > > even if it were.... > > But, I think that Merc made a genuine mistake in "wrongly identifying > > Cold Water" she acknowledged it and made her apology, on board.... as > > a practical matter, I say that, at this point you do not have a leg to > > stand on and that you are apparently maliciously banning Merc egged on > > by those same actual (ABC Political Scrotum Boards) child abusers who > > are the actual culprits.... > > Anyway, that is the situation....That " is what it is".... you don't > > seem able either to recognize it or to amend your own error.... and > > Nominal9's Censorship Hall of Shame is looming nearer by the > > moment..... > > > On Nov 21, 2:18 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Nominal9, > > > > The only person to bring Mercs kid into the conversation was Merc, the > > only > > > person to levy a threat against another persons child was Merc, the only > > > person to victimize Merc was Merc herself. > > > > This is a political forum.... just what do you think her kids "condition" > > > has to do with politics unless she had been using her experiences to talk > > > about or relate personally under the health care laws which she did not > > do. > > > > She was using that child as a crutch to garner some level of sympathy... > > > (between shit and syphilis in dictionary). > > > > Again, I do not care who did it !!!!!! No one is "special". To bring any > > > child into this forum in any negative light is ABSOLUTELY NOT GOING TO > > > HAPPEN. > > > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 12:41 PM, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Mark M. Kahle H. , you evaded the point... you are further victimizing > > > > Merc, a person who has been subjected to the conduct that you yourself > > > > seem to condemn.... > > > > "Kids, mentioned in a negative manner or any misguided wish that > > > > someones > > > > elses kid were also ill is wrong." > > > > Answer the direct question and please don't double-talk....Stop > > > > grandstanding, or behaving like a sententious, dictatorial NAZI ... > > > > The Hell Pits of Nominal9's Censorship Hall of Shame are looming > > > > near.... > > > > Nominal9 > > > > > PS... Listen to Ewe who goes BAAAAHHHH... and you are more than Half- > > > > Way there.... you too, can join the likes of the Cecotrophic Rabbit, > > > > the Pusillanimous Pellet... or Cosmo Cornuto Magcrest, and their > > > > Board... Euwe-topia... since renamed... Cornuto-pia. > > > > > Hypocrites.... one and all.... > > > > > On Nov 19, 12:40 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > We have decided and it is rather simple: > > > > > > Kids, mentioned in a negative manner or any misguided wish that > > someones > > > > > elses kid were also ill is wrong. > > > > > > KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS, NO SECOND CHANCES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > > > > > Nominal9 if you can't live with that, I am sorry. > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:22 AM, nominal9 <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > I was discomforted when Merc brought her child into a string. To > > > > > > bring > > > > > > in a child is distasteful at best. She then went on to wish the > > same > > > > > > upon another posters child and in rather raunchy terms.... This I > > > > > > will > > > > > > not abide from anyone about any child. The words she used about > > > > > > children (regardless of whose) is (thank God) a felony in my > > country. > > > > > > To have allowed them to post would have made me complicit. > > > > > > > One last Time............ KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS IN THIS FORUM. > > > > > > > There are NO second chances. /Annointed One > > > > > > > I've only known Merc on the boards for about one year.... > > > > > > Point is, her child is the one who is (however it is prioperly > > > > > > put).... disabled... not anyone else's child. I truly believe that > > > > > > Merc has and conntinues to lash out at others (incluing their > > > > > > children) because those others have lashed out at her own child (of > > > > > > course, Merc sometimes gets confused in her emotional outbursts and > > > > > > happens to target innocent bystanders, but she "usually" corrects > > > > > > herself when she is made aware of the error) .... Merc is the > > victim, > > > > > > and anyone seeking to make her the "perpetrator" is just very > > ignorant > > > > > > or is trying to pull some sort of "reverse-discrimination" > > > > > > scam....You. Annointed One speak of yourself as being a liberal- > > > > > > progressive sort of person and here you champiion the interestes of > > > > > > "children'... If that is true, I definitely think that you missed > > the > > > > > > boat in using that "angle" to censure Merc....As I understand it, > > Merc > > > > > > is also trained to somne extent in medicine, I believe that she is > > a > > > > > > registered nurse of some kind... So, in terms of medical knowledge > > or > > > > > > even psychological stability.... I think she has a leg up on most > > > > > > others here abouts.... > > > > > > There's reality and then there's what "posters" spew out to make > > > > > > points in arguments [on [political bioards and such.].. Merc is > > living > > > > > > a reality, when it comes to at least this one issue.....Cheap shots > > > > > > just do not carry the same eight... or they shouldn't... among > > "half- > > > > > > way serious folks" who try to deal in mutually respectful > > > > > > relationships.... of course... if people just want to sling the > > crap > > > > > > around... tha'ts alright, too, as long as it's understood for the > > crap > > > > > > that it is and given it's due "weight".....The crap that has been > > > > > > slung against Merc... IMO.... is not worth censorship or > > > > > > "banning"..... > > > > > > Let me know awhat "y'all" decide.... > > > > > > > On Nov 18, 9:21 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Nominal9, > > > > > > > > I was discomforted when Merc brought her child into a string. To > > > > bring > > > > > > > in a child is distasteful at best. She then went on to wish the > > same > > > > > > > upon another posters child and in rather raunchy terms.... This I > > > > will > > > > > > > not abide from anyone about any child. The words she used about > > > > > > > children (regardless of whose) is (thank God) a felony in my > > country. > > > > > > > To have allowed them to post would have made me complicit. > > > > > > > > One last Time............ KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS IN THIS FORUM. > > > > > > > > There are NO second chances. > > > > > > > > On Nov 18, 4:26 pm, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Annointed One, Keith from Tampa... > > > > > > > > Mark M. Kahle H. > > > > > > > > Kindly reconsider.... I don't like censors.... lowest of the > > low, > > > > in > > > > > > > > my book.... usually the jaclass stupidest of the jackass > > stupid, > > > > as > > > > > > > > well..... have to be, to think censorship is any sort of > > > > answer.... > > > > > > > > Always room in the Hell > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
