Personally I am all for prosecuting this 19 year old.

But where are the limits for the State encouraging people who want to do
terrorism or other crime to do it, so they can then arrest them?

What if they had used a very attractive woman (or man) to seduce him into
doing it?  Or offered him money?  Or to help with a family medical or legal
issue?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: MJ <


 Saturday, November 27, 2010
*Oregon: FBI Thwarts Own Car Bomb
*Will Americans recoil in yet more contrived fear?
The Portland Patsy
Tony Cartalucci, Contributing Writer -- *Activist
Post*<http://www.activistpost.com/2010/11/oregon-fbi-thwarts-own-car-bomb.html>
<http://www.activistpost.com/2010/11/oregon-fbi-thwarts-own-car-bomb.html>

The United States' Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) claims to have
thwarted their own car
bomb<http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/11/fbi_thwarts_terrorist_bombing.html>Friday,
November 26, 2010 at a Christmas tree lighting ceremony in Portland,
Oregon's Pioneer Courthouse Square.

A 19 year old man, Mr. Mohamed Osman Mohamud, was in contact with undercover
FBI agents since June of 2010. FBI agents claim they were acting as an
accomplice of a supposed Pakistani terrorist that Mr. Mohamud had been in
contact with as early as 2008. Unlike the supposed Pakistani terrorist Mr.
Mohamud was in contact with, the FBI actually supplied him with a bomb.

According to the FBI, their undercover agents had decided to meet with Mr.
Mohamud in Portland in July 2010, where Mr. Mohamud expressed a desire to
conduct "Jihad" against non-Muslims. The story fast-forwards to Friday,
November 26, 2010, when Mr. Mohamud was arrested after trying to detonate an
inert bomb supplied to him by the FBI, on the corner of Southwest Yamhill
Street and Sixth Avenue -- in full view of the ceremony.

Perplexing is why the FBI, knowing Mr. Mohamud's criminal intent, and upon
delivering the bomb to the willing would-be terrorist, would allow him to
approach a large public venue and attempt to detonate the device in public
view. While the US Attorney's Office maintains that "the public was never in
danger," they apparently didn't read the news about a recent stampede in
Cambodia <http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11827313> that cost
450 panicked people their lives.

Maximum bloodless terrorism upon a public increasingly skeptical about the
official narrative of the "War on Terror" comes to mind. This skepticism, of
course, comes from the fact that the only groups that seem to be actually
building bombs and conducting terrorist operations are within our own
Western governments. This is reinforced by shocking
revelations<http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/10/20/al-qaeda-terror-leader-dined-pentagon-months/>
that Anwar Al-Awlaki dined at the Pentagon, months after 9/11 while listed
as Al Qaeda's #3. Al-Awlaki has since been linked to the the "Underwear
Bomber," the "Fort Hood Shooter," the "Times Square Bomber," and the "Shoe
Bomber," as well as the recent Yemeni parcel "bombs."

Parallels between Portland's staged terror stunt can be seen with a very
similar FBI operation that went "wrong" on  February 26, 1993 at New York
City's World Trade Center. The FBI was also in contact with willing
terrorists whom they assisted in building an inert bomb. Inexplicably, the
FBI agents switched the inert explosives with a real device which was then
delivered to the WTC and detonated, killing 6 and injuring 1,042.

These revelations were made public after FBI informant, former Egyptian army
officer Emad Salem, revealed recordings he made of his conversations with
the FBI agents. He became suspicious of their motives and feared for his own
safety upon realizing real explosives were being used. The recordings were
published by the New York
Times<http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-proposal-to-thwart-bomb-used-in-trade-center-blast.html>
.

While the mainstream media attempts to downplay the outrage of Americans
concerning the government's latest choice for air passengers -- a hazardous
ineffective x-ray machine or an equally ineffective, humiliating, and
un-Constitutional groping -- the stage was set for another high-profile
terrorism story to reinforce the establishment's faltering propaganda.

Will Americans recoil in fear from a bomb the FBI admits they constructed,
gave to a patsy, and sent to disrupt Portland's Christmas celebrations? Will
Americans continue to be dragged into the staged " Clash of
Civilizations<http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2010/09/globalist-stunts-islamophobia.html>?"
Or will their fury over a failed, dictatorial government bent to the will of
foreign bankers be compounded by this latest, juvenile attempt at stoking
fear and compliance across the population? That story must be written by the
American people.

*Additional Note:* The Justice Department's official statement found
here<http://www.katu.com/news/local/110898914.html>, says Mohamud
attempted to detonate the device remotely, which is not "in
public view," though apparently the van was indeed parked next to the square
and contained an explosive device described as "inert." Additionally, it
states that FBI agents constructed and detonated a real device with Mohamud
on November 4, 2010 in a run-up to the actual event. The implications of FBI
agents posing as terrorists, constructing and detonating real explosives are
frightening.

Tony Cartalucci's articles have appeared on many alternative media websites,
including his own at Land Destroyer <http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/>.

*RELATED VIDEO:
 The FBI Has A History of Creating Terrorists, to Terrorize
Americans<http://www.activistpost.com/2010/11/fbi-has-history-of-creating-terrorists.html>
*

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to