No, why do you?
On 12/8/10, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> wrote: > Tommy, > > How come you always resort to insults when you can't legitimately refute > what others have to say? > > On 12/8/2010 8:27 AM, Tommy News wrote: >> Shut the F*** Up, Dick The Prick. >> >> On 12/8/10, dick thompson<[email protected]> wrote: >>> What was offensive was Fat Teddy doing what he did to Mary Jo Kopechne >>> and to Bork and handing our plans to the Russians during the Reagan >>> administration - also disrespectful and anti-American. I don't even >>> come close to the things that man did both to us and to the women he >>> maltreated all those years. >>> >>> And you are still trying to couple all the votes against the military >>> budget and claiming that it was voted down for the repeal inclusion and >>> that is not true like so many of your claims. In my estimation the >>> Dream Act was more voted against than the DADT provision was. That is >>> more of a problem than the DADT is. >>> >>> What you can't seem to realize is that if you want to parade that >>> concept around then you need to get the vote specifically on that >>> issue. Until you do that then you are just blowing smoke without any >>> basis. >>> >>> On 12/08/2010 10:09 AM, Tommy News wrote: >>>> So? That is normal procedure. The reason the bill was voted down was >>>> DADT repeal inclusion. John McCain led the vote against cloture. He >>>> and the Republicans also put our troops at risk by voting against the >>>> bill. >>>> >>>> And, Dick the Prick, calling Ted Kennedy "Fat Teddy" is both >>>> offensive, disrespectful, and anti-American. >>>> >>>> On 12/7/10, dick thompson<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> And check the military budget for what is in it and you will see >>>>> the Dream Act and the DADT repeal and a lot of other things including a >>>>> statue for Fat Teddy in Mass. That budget bill was what was voted down >>>>> and the attachments were why it was voted down. DADT was never >>>>> attempted to be repealed by itself. >>>>> >>>>> On 12/07/2010 10:09 AM, Tommy News wrote: >>>>>> Greg- >>>>>> >>>>>> The senate voted this fall AGAINST debating the repealing Don't Ask >>>>>> Don't >>>>>> Tell. >>>>>> John McCain led the oppositon, and I watched the entire debate and >>>>>> vote on C-Span. >>>>>> >>>>>> It appears that it is YOU who are misinformed. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12/7/10, GregfromBoston<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> Sorry Tom, but Reid piggy backed several items, including Dream Act >>>>>>> and DADT in an appropriations bill. So, you have no idea what was >>>>>>> filibustered. Thats just math. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Dec 6, 9:21 pm, Tommy News<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> No, you are mistaken. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The GOP in the Senate, led by John McCain, filibustered, voted >>>>>>>> against Cloture, and blocked DADT repeal. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The blame lies with GOP Senators John McCain, Boehner, Mitch >>>>>>>> McConnell, >>>>>>>> etc. >>>>>>>> Every single republican voted against cloture. Every single one. >>>>>>>> On 12/6/10, GregfromBoston<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Don't Ask, Don't Tell has BEEN repealed. Obama and his DOJ are >>>>>>>>> fighting that in court. >>>>>>>>> Feel silly yet? >>>>>>>>> On Dec 5, 2:06 pm, Tommy News<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> This obstrucionist behavior of the Republicans is dispicable. >>>>>>>>>> Call, >>>>>>>>>> Fax and Write your two US Senators and DEMAND the repeal of DADT >>>>>>>>>> during this session of Congress. They now claim that this is not >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> right time to repeal DADT. Exactly why not? This month is the >>>>>>>>>> right >>>>>>>>>> time and the only time, or this could take years when the new >>>>>>>>>> Grand >>>>>>>>>> Obstrucionist Party led Congress is sworn in in January with thier >>>>>>>>>> primary agenda being making the President of The United States >>>>>>>>>> fail. >>>>>>>>>> Mitch McConnell: Don't' Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Won't Happen This >>>>>>>>>> Year, >>>>>>>>>> Tax Cuts Will Be Extended (VIDEO) >>>>>>>>>> WASHINGTON -- Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) sent >>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>> message to "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (DADT) repeal advocates on >>>>>>>>>> Sunday: >>>>>>>>>> Don't hold your breath. He said the policy change is unlikely to >>>>>>>>>> happen this year. He stated, however, that the prognosis for >>>>>>>>>> passing >>>>>>>>>> an extension of unemployment benefits and tax cuts looks brighter. >>>>>>>>>> The National Defense Authorization Act, said McConnell on NBC's >>>>>>>>>> "Meet >>>>>>>>>> the Press" on Sunday, typically takes two weeks. "I don't see how >>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>> can possibly finish the defense authorization bill, a two-week >>>>>>>>>> bill, >>>>>>>>>> fully aside from these controversial items that are in it -- there >>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>> a whole lot of other things in it -- before the end of the year." >>>>>>>>>> When asked by host David Gregory whether he thinks there is enough >>>>>>>>>> support to lift the ban on gays and lesbians serving openly in the >>>>>>>>>> military, McConnell simply replied, "My personal view is that Sen. >>>>>>>>>> McCain is correct on this. I tend to follow his lead. We'll find >>>>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>>>> when we finally get around to debating this bill, which I think >>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>> be before the end of the year." McCain, of course, has been one of >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> most vocal opponents of repealing DADT, consistently finding new >>>>>>>>>> explanations for supporting the ban. >>>>>>>>>> Video Here: >>>>>>>>>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/05/mitch-mcconnell-dadt-repeal-... >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. >>>>>>>>>> Have a great day, >>>>>>>>>> Tommy >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>>>>> For options& help >>>>>>>>> seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. >>>>>>>> Have a great day, >>>>>>>> Tommy- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>>> For options& help see >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>> -- >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>> For options& help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>> >>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> -- >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> For options& help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> >>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> > > -- > *I reserve the right to do as I please.* > > *"There is no crueler tyranny than that which is exercised under cover > of law, and with the colors of justice ..." > - U.S. v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982) > > "If Americans wish to be free of judicial tyranny, they must at least > develop basic knowledge of the judicial role in our republican > government. The present state of affairs is a direct result of our > collective ignorance." > - Ron Paul* > > *Our courts will never be fair and just again until we force the courts > to follow their own rules. Do not allow yourself to be ruled by tyrants. > Learn how to control corrupt judges and crooked lawyers > <http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=CG0004> so you can get > Justice! Learn to litigate: Buy and Study JURISDICTIONARY > <http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=CG0004>. The best course > available for Pro Se and Pro Per litigants.* > > *I Refuse To Comply > <http://constitutionpreservation.org/media-archive/i-will-not-comply> > With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal Government* > http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html > > *Government is only as strong as those who allow themselves to be > governed are weak.* > > *"We have plenty of rights in this country, provided you don't get > caught exercising them." > - Terry Mitchell > > "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free it expects something that > cannot be." > - Thomas Jefferson*** > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. Have a great day, Tommy -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
