The Ozone Scare: A Retrospective
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
by Rod Rojas
Remember when the thinning of the ozone layer was going to cause us all
to die of malignant melanoma, just a few years ago? The ozone scare seems
to have dropped off the radar entirely.
As you might remember, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) were the evil du jour,
playing the same role carbon dioxide (CO2) plays today in the
global-warming scare. Environmentalists claimed that CFCs would somehow
travel 40 miles up above the surface of the earth, despite the fact that
CFCs are about five times heavier than air. A common case of floating
bricks, no doubt.
By banning CFCs in 1989, the 196 countries who signed the Montreal
Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer lost a cheap, safe,
nontoxic, chemically inert, noncorrosive, and nonflammable source of
refrigerants, propellants, and fire-control-system components.
As with most regulations, the CFC ban hit the poor with a vengeance.
Millions of perfectly functioning refrigerators could no longer be
recharged with Freon, so everyone was forced to purchase new CFC-free
appliances. This, of course, was especially difficult for those with low
incomes.
Another group that still suffers greatly are asthma patients. The
substitutes for CFC inhalers are the HFA (hydro-fluoroalkane) inhalers,
which many doctors report to be of marginal effectiveness compared to the
CFC version, which provided faster and longer-lasting relief from the
agony of suffocation. Many patients have found that, whereas one puff
used to be sufficient to reopen the airways, the new product requires two
or even three puffs to work. This raises the cost of the medication due
to the increased dosage. And to add insult to injury, because of their
recent introduction, HFA inhalers are protected by patent law, whereas
CFC inhalers were already generic. Prices per inhaler have increased from
the $5–$25 range to the $30–$60 range in the United States.
Needless to say, taxpayers are still funding research into this bogus
field, and the CFC ban is still alive and well. As always, regulations
and funding are very easily put in place especially when the public is
manipulated with scare tactics but they are very hard to roll back; in
fact, regulations are hardly ever repealed, and the institutions in
charge of enforcing them are only occasionally dismantled.
It is important to recognize the behavioral pattern of governments, NGOs,
and scientists by looking at similar scares, such as acid rain,
Y2K,
mad-cow
disease,
H1N1, and
now climate change and terrorism. Fear and guilt are the usual tools used
to rob citizens of their liberty and money. These scares foster the
centralized masterminding of our choices and allow ever-greater transfers
of power and wealth toward the government.
Environmental scares are particularly effective because they combine the
fear and the guilt effects. Such "man-against-nature" scenarios
will provide endless possibilities for loss of liberty unless power is
taken away from governments altogether.
Unless we realize that man and nature are one and the same, there will be
no degree of underdevelopment low enough for the ecofanatics: the
so-called philosopher poet of the ecological movement,
Derrick Jensen,
wrote that "civilization is not and can never be sustainable."
We should not underestimate this type of statement, especially coming
from a man like Jensen, who has a wide audience and has repeatedly
defended the use of militant violence to achieve environmental goals. We
must be wary, not so much because of the possibility of Jensen's own
violent actions, but because of government's talent for harvesting such
ideas and using them to its advantage.
Watch for a new scare just as the climate-change myth loses steam and the
population grows weary of antiterrorism.
Rod Rojas is a holder of the Canadian Securities Course designation and
performs as a financial adviser in personal, corporate, and public-policy
matters. He is a proud member of the Ontario Libertarian Party.
http://mises.org/daily/4888
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
