He will busy as he needs to check everything but the comics. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:41 PM, dick thompson <[email protected]>wrote:
> I would think the fact checker should be checking all the facts, > not just those that readers question. It seems that should be his job. > Washington Post’s new Fact Checker column > debuts<http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2011/01/welcome_to_the_new_fact_checke.html> > > [image: Jim Romenesko] by Jim Romenesko *Published* Jan. 11, 2011 8:22 am > *Updated* Jan. 11, 2011 9:07 am > > *Washington > Post*<http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2011/01/welcome_to_the_new_fact_checke.html> > *Glenn Kessler*, editor of the revived column, says he’ll rely on readers > to ask questions and point out statements that need to be checked. “This is > a fact-checking operation, not an opinion-checking operation,” he notes. “We > are interested only in verifiable facts, though on occasion we may examine > the roots of political rhetoric.” > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at > http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
