I did indeed answer the question. Here is my answer again:
No guns = No gun violence. On 1/13/11, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > You won't answer the question. There are a ton of guns out there. You > take them from regular citizens but how do you take them from > criminals. Until you do that you will have gun violence. If you do > take all the guns then how are the elderly and infirm going to be able > to protect themselves. Remember all the problems with the scum in > Brooklyn who attacked the elderly with sticks and knives. That is the > future you are trying to bring back A ridiculous stand to take for > anyone with a mind. > > On 01/13/2011 03:04 PM, Tommy News wrote: >> Your Twisted pretzel Reich wing bumper sticker logic does not pass >> muster, Dickie. >> >> No guns = No gun violence. >> >> On 1/13/11, dick thompson<[email protected]> wrote: >>> And how do you plan to take the guns from the criminals. Check out >>> Boston. They tried to get rid of the guns and ended up with more gun >>> crimes than ever. Same with Chicago. Your ideas just do not work. >>> Take away the guns and only the criminals will have guns. Simple. Even >>> you should be able to see that if you tried. >>> >>> On 01/13/2011 01:12 PM, Tommy News wrote: >>>> Without any guns, there can be no guns to fire. >>>> >>>> Get rid of all guns gradually, over time. Start NOW! >>>> >>>> On 1/13/11, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> At 01:05 PM 1/13/2011, you wrote: >>>>>> Hooray for them! >>>>>> >>>>>> Repeal the Second Amendment and end the gun violence! >>>>> How do you figure? >>>>> >>>>> Regard$, >>>>> --MJ >>>>> >>>>> Laws that forbid the carrying of arms ... disarm only those who are >>>>> neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make >>>>> things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they >>>>> serve rather to encourage than prevent homicides, for an unarmed man >>>>> may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed one. -- Thomas >>>>> Jefferson quoting Cesare Beccaria, Criminologist 1764 (1743-1826) >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>> For options& help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>> >>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> -- >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> For options& help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> >>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. Have a great day, Tommy -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
