<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/author/scottystarnes/> Goldman Sachs
to only offer FaceBook shares to Non-US Citizens to skirt US
Securities 
law<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2011/01/18/goldman-sachs-to-only-offer-facebook-shares-to-non-us-citizens-to-skirt-us-securities-law/>
*Scotty Starnes
<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/author/scottystarnes/>*| January
18, 2011 at 12:20 PM | Tags: American
taxpayers <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=american-taxpayers>,
bailouts <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=bailouts>,
FaceBook<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=facebook>,
foreign investors<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=foreign-investors>,
Goldman Sachs <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=goldman-sachs>,
SEC<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=sec>| Categories:
Uncategorized<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?category_name=uncategorized>|
URL:
http://wp.me/pvnFC-4ap

<http://scottystarnes.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/facebook-icon.png>

Goldman Sachs doesn't mind taking $12.9
billion<http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2010-07-24-goldman-bailout-cash_N.htm>
from
American taxpayers. Now we have word that this same bailed out corporation
is refusing to sell Facebook shares to the same Americans who bailed them
out.

The Wall Street
Journal<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703396604576087941210274036.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories>
reports:

Goldman Sachs 
Group<http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&symbol=GS>Inc.
slammed the door on U.S. clients hoping to invest in a private
offering
of shares in Facebook Inc., because it said the intense media spotlight left
the deal in danger of violating U.S. securities laws.

*Goldman's decision to allow only non-U.S. investors to buy shares in the
social-networking site is a black eye for the Wall Street firm, which sent
jealous rivals scurrying for look-alike deals when the Facebook agreement
surfaced two weeks ago.*

Typical Goldman Sachs. Most of the bailout money they received from the
American taxpayers also went overseas to foreign
banks<http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2010/07/25/2010-07-25_goldmans_money_trail.html>
.

The change could damage Goldman's ties to some of its most lucrative
clients, left empty-handed just as they were deciding whether to invest in
Facebook, clients say.

Facebook executives were frustrated by the headache of restructuring the
deal at the last minute, according to people familiar with the situation.
But the private offering of as much as $1.5 billion in Facebook shares
remains on track.

Over $7 billion in orders have poured in from foreign investors, or more
than $4 for every $1 in shares being sold, according to people familiar with
the situation. While high-profile U.S. investors would have been another
seal of approval for Facebook, *a person close to the company said it is
comfortable with a heavier-than-expected concentration of non-U.S. investors
*. About 70% of the site's users live outside the U.S.

The Palo Alto, Calif., company had already attained a $50 billion valuation,
solidified by a *$500 million direct investment Goldman itself made in
Facebook with Russian investment company Digital Sky Technologies*, the
knowledgeable people said. The $1.5 billion is being raised on top of that
investment.

In a statement Monday, Goldman said the offering was rejiggered after the
New York company *"concluded the level of media attention might not be
consistent with the proper completion of a U.S. private placement under U.S.
law." *The decision, made last week and announced to clients starting Sunday
night, wasn't "required or requested by any other party," Goldman said.

Under an SEC rule known as Regulation D, private placements like the
Facebook deal "cannot be the subject of advertising, general promotional
seminars or public meetings in connection with the offering."

*Rules outside the U.S. governing private placements are less strict *about
publicity as long as the deal is offered to individuals and institutions
that qualify as "professional investors." *Goldman likely won't come under
fire in foreign markets* for the hype that has accompanied the offering.

American taxpayer dollars are good to bail out Goldman Sachs but Americans
are not good enough to buy stock. Notice that Facebook said they like the
non-US investors. Maybe Americans should reject Facebook and stop using
their social network.

Continue 
reading>>><http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703396604576087941210274036.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories>

Add a comment to this
post<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2011/01/18/goldman-sachs-to-only-offer-facebook-shares-to-non-us-citizens-to-skirt-us-securities-law/#respond>
<http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/scottystarnes.wordpress.com/16021/>
<http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/scottystarnes.wordpress.com/16021/>
<http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/scottystarnes.wordpress.com/16021/>
<http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/scottystarnes.wordpress.com/16021/>
<http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/scottystarnes.wordpress.com/16021/>
<http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/scottystarnes.wordpress.com/16021/>
<http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/scottystarnes.wordpress.com/16021/>

  [image: WordPress]

WordPress.com <http://wordpress.com/> | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage 
Subscriptions<http://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=5d39acfd19218362d540a3fc3dc3315d&email=baconlard%40gmail.com>|
Unsubscribe<http://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=5d39acfd19218362d540a3fc3dc3315d&email=baconlard%40gmail.com&b=QOvGT1CAWo3GjCZg%3FYl73h6%7C3DbZRzDSiY6pYO%3FD>|
Express
yourself. Start a blog. <http://wordpress.com/signup/?ref=email>

*Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:*
http://subscribe.wordpress.com

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to