"While American officials are surely
losing sleep over Egypt, the American people need to understand that Arab
hostility toward the United States is not directed at their way of life
but at a foreign policy that treats them like colonial subjects and
Israel like a privileged child."
The Unraveling of U.S. Mideast
Policy
by
Sheldon Richman,
February 3, 2010
The blow to U.S. foreign policy by the popular uprising in Egypt cannot
be overstated. The Egyptians’ demand that Hosni Mubarak, who has ruled
Egypt with an iron hand and billions of American taxpayer dollars, step
down is unquestionably a major setback to the U.S. governing class and
its plans for the Middle East. Since the end of World War II, critics of
U.S. policy have warned that defying the people of the region in favor of
authoritarian ruling elites was doomed to failure. As things now begin to
unravel, we see that those critics were right.
President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton say they support
the aspirations of the Egyptian people. Previous officials have said that
too. But let’s be clear. American officials support those aspirations
only so long as they do not impede U.S. policy. Those officials are smart
enough to know that if the Egyptian people have no way to let off steam,
the lid will blow. So when the president says he supports reform, he
means reform no deeper than necessary to take pressure off whatever the
U.S. government regards as important.
The problem for the ruling elite is that there’s little it can do to
steer events. Its vaunted firepower and intelligence apparatus are
useless against the masses in the street. Still, Obama and Clinton
persist in the fantasy that they can determine such things as the timing
of the transition to a new government. Their admonitions and
condescension are pathetic. The empire is revealed to be a pitiful giant.
The American policy elite is clearly in a bind. It is helpless, yet it
needs Egypt to be controlled by Mubarak or someone like him. The main
reason can be stated in one word: Israel. As the New York Times wrote,
“For 30 years, [Mubarak’s] government has been a pillar of American
foreign policy in a volatile region, not least because of Egypt’s peace
treaty with Israel. American officials fear that a new government
particularly one dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood or other Islamist
groups may not honor the treaty signed in 1979 by Mr. Mubarak’s
predecessor, Anwar el-Sadat.”
That peace treaty was purchased by President Jimmy Carter with the U.S.
taxpayers’ money. (See my article “More Mideast Bills,”:
http://www.fff.org/comment/ed0700f.asp.) As a result, the Egyptian
government has gotten more than a billion dollars a year since 1979;
Israel has gotten about $2 billion. With a client state in the grip of a
torturous dictator, it is easy for the U.S. ruling elite to ignore what
the subject population wants. But now things have changed. The Egyptian
people, like other Arabs, hate Israel’s oppression of the Palestinians
and America’s support of it. Whatever government emerges from the current
popular movement is unlikely to kowtow to U.S.-Israel policy. If the new
president, seduced by American dollars, were to pick up where Mubarak
left off, he would be inviting the people back into the streets. That
does not mean a new government would seek war with Israel, but it would
no longer be a “pillar of American foreign policy.” Official Egyptian
solidarity with the long-suffering Palestinians would be a setback for
the American and Israeli governments. It might leave Israel no choice but
finally to attend to Palestinian grievances. That would be welcome.
While American officials are surely losing sleep over Egypt, the American
people need to understand that Arab hostility toward the United States is
not directed at their way of life but at a foreign policy that treats
them like colonial subjects and Israel like a privileged child.
Even if the Muslim Brotherhood were to gain a dominant role in the next
government -- unlikely in secular Egypt -- the only danger to Americans
would stem from continued meddling. As former CIA analyst Bruce Reidel
notes, the Muslim Brotherhood has given up violence. If the U.S.
government stops intervening, the Muslim Brotherhood will attend to Egypt
and ignore America.
The American governing class still thinks it can orchestrate events in
the Middle East. It can’t. A new era has opened. Now is a good time for
U.S. officials to stop thinking in terms of allies and adversaries.
Military and economic aid should be terminated for all parties. In its
place: nonintervention and free trade.
http://www.fff.org/comment/com1102a.asp
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
- The Unraveling of U.S. Mideast Policy MJ
- The Unraveling of U.S. Mideast Policy Jonathan Ashley
