Its more than semantics. unless you can show me where the gubmint has to power to tell them what they "have to" do with their profits.
I can't find it. On Feb 8, 2:53 pm, studio <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 7, 6:15 pm, GregfromBoston <[email protected]> wrote: > > > He's wrong. Change "have to", to "should", and he's good. > > Much like where Bush Jr. talked to Wall Street Financial CEO's and > told them; "they *should* lend more to businesses in order to create > more jobs". > > They didn't. > He was just as wrong as Obama will be. > These semantics mean nothing and amount to nothing more than worthless > symbolism. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
