MJ: Take you "quotations" elsewhere. Ha, ha, HA! — J. A. A. — > On Feb 16, 8:44 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > So you ARE going to ENDLESSLY spew fallacy in a circle. > A pity as with each effort you lose further credibility. > Your failure to provide this 'work' of yours suggests its lacking nature. > I remain interested and waiting for its presentation. > Regard$, > --MJIt is amazing how many people think that they can answer an argument by > attributing bad motives to those who disagree with them. Using this kind of > reasoning, you can believe or not believe anything about anything, without > having to bother to deal with facts or logic. -- Thomas SowellAt 10:50 PM > 2/15/2011, you wrote:Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't > on a par with > your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered > for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things > when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, I > must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual approval > of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the > ratification process. — John A. Armistead — Patriot > > > On Feb 14, 1:29 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > So you are going to ENDLESSLY spew fallacy? > > Why not simply posit your Constitution instead so it can be discussed and > > we might get somewhere? > > Regard$, > > --MJIt is amazing how many people think that they can > > answer an argument by attributing bad motives to > > those who disagree with them. Using this kind of > > reasoning, you can believe or not believe anything > > about anything, without having to bother to deal > > with facts or logic. -- Thomas SowellAt 01:20 PM 2/14/2011, you wrote:On > > Feb 14, 10:09 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par with > > your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered > > for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things > > when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, I > > must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual approval > > of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the > > ratification process. — John A. Armistead — Patriot > > > > > > Why you imagine spewing fallacy aids your cause is unknown. > > > I can certainly understand WHY you would prefer NOT to support (or > > > attempt to) your efforts or claims. > > > Regard$, > > > --MJA state of skepticism and suspense may amuse a few inquisitive > > > minds. But the practice of superstition is so congenial to the > > > multitude that, if they are forcibly awakened, they still regret > > > the loss of their pleasing vision. > > > -- Edward Gibbon, _Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire_At 11:36 PM > > > 2/13/2011, you wrote:Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, > > > aren't on a par with > > > your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered > > > for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things > > > when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, I > > > must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual approval > > > of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the > > > ratification process. — John A. Armistead — Patriot > > > > > > > On Feb 12, 9:35 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > MJ, you seem to be on-the-fence whether you concur with what I'm > > > > doing. I invite your more specific comments, because time does not > > > > allow me to be as wordy in future replies. Your "$" salutation amuses > > > > I would need to see the TEXT of this Constitution in order to > > > > discuss it. I erroneously believed we were discussing the US > > > > Constitution ... and then you wanted to instead argue about something > > > > I STILL have not seen -- as though I instead had. > > > > Post the text already. > > > > I will provide the text of something that appears quite workable. > > > > Regard$, > > > > --MJThe fact that I have no remedy for all the sorrows of the world is > > > > no reason for my accepting yours. It simply supports the strong > > > > probability that yours is a fake. -- H.L. Mencken > > > -- > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > -- > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
