On Feb 17, 12:56 pm, studio <[email protected]> wrote:
I am just going to have to ignore all that babble "let's pretend" stuff you wrote. It just makes no sense at all. > > Good for her! Anybody that gets offered money to do something is > > good. Because it is a willing transaction on both sides. > > that is the way it supposed to work. > > Let's pretend it was good for Hitler and many others by that > definition also. See? Your response has nothing to do with what I said. You went straight to Hitler, come on man. > Let's make more examples of people who aren't qualified to earn large > sums of money for little value, and before you know it, you'll have > many more that want to also. I say power to all of them, qualified or not. Earning money is not by force. They offered the money to her. What do you care anyway? Jealous? Sounds like it. > Let the rich sue and put lawsuits on people who've done nothing wrong. > Even if they're not actually legally on the right side, you can still > bankrupt all the victim's who are right. > And by your definition, it's perfectly alright. Which definition was that? You are off the deep end of a left field rant. You are not arguing against anything I specifically said. In fact, you are not arguing at all. Your rants contain no arguments. > It would be a great way of consolidating power and making sure only > those that are like-minded may get rich or powerful. Again, you are spinning like a top. I never said anything remotely close to that. > And people shouldn't be able to steal food if their starving right? You mean if "they are" starving? No, needs do not justify crimes. > Your answer is they should go to the library, or just die quietly? No, you didn't even read my answer did you? Are you even capable? > Tell me; how do you feel about public sex or public masturbation? It is poor judgment at minimum, almost as bad as your argument here. What the hell are you talking about? > It doesn't physical harm anyone else right? > They shouldn't be forced by anyone to stop right? > > So do it and let us know what the consequences were and tell me why > those people who stopped you were wrong. I don't see any connection to what we are talking about (jobs, benefits). Now you are talking about public sex! Is this your "force" argument? I don't know where to begin to explain how wrong that comparison is. > The problem with your extremist philosophy is; you conveniently ignore > what the real the consequences will be. Here is where you fail to give an example. It would help. > So what are you willing to give up for what you want (which is > everything)? > Nothing? I have no idea what you are talking about. You need to focus on one thing at a time man. The head has flown off the hammer. Be specific. > Then you will be forced to like everyone else in history with good > intentions was. Right. Ok then. Hey, thanks for sharing. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
