MJ, the party crasher, socialist-communist is bent on destroying, not saving the USA. So, that YELLING, quotation-mad jerk is rightly undeserving of a reply. — J. A. A. — > On Mar 23, 12:43 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > If you find what I'm writing to be interesting enough to read every day, > then you are either very much in favor of what I'm saying or very threatened > and thus opposed. > Fallacy of bifurcation The "tone" of my document is pro control of government > by the people; maximum civil liberties; having the most efficient use of tax > dollars; respect for the environment; and respect for the rights of others. > I suspect you can't see the positive tone, because > you are jealous of my commitment and talent to accomplish what I have. > By WHICH people? > What is a 'civil liberty'? > Most efficient as defined by whom? Why them? You do realize by clinging to > 'taxation' you are endorsing what you previously suggested that you > opposed.If you are FOR the people, Mark, embrace my New Constitution. > Fallacy ofAudiatur et altera pars as well asDenial of the antecedent -- among > others.If you are AGAINST the people, then stop replying on my posts. No > socialist-communists are welcomed in the USA! — John A. Armistead — > I think you uphold Inigo Montoya's observation quite well. > "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." > YOU DO REALIZE THAT THIS IS YELLING!?!? > Regard$, > --MJMuch of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual legacy. > It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught > many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient > facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the > intellectual process itself. This has been one of the sources of its enduring > strength as a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and using > political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas SowellPatriot> > On Mar 22, 7:50 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > The biggest problem Einstein will have with his "New Constitution" is that > > we CAN READ AND COMPREHEND. > > > > The other immediate problem is that he can't remember one day to the next > > what he says. > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:47 PM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Asked and answered -- only you tried to change the subject while > > > pretending > > > it did not occur. ELSEWHERE in THIS thread: Socialism and communism are > > > the anti-thesis of a representative republic or a democracy. My New > > > Constitution RETURNS civil liberties to the People and will fire, jail or > > > hang those in government who support socialism and communism. When you > > > attack my New Constitution with your "include me" talk, you are attacking > > > THE most pro capitalism and pro civil liberties person on the planet! Get > > > lost, Jonathan! J. A. A. > > > And now HERE in THIS thread the same person: > > > I am personally recommending that Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and > > > Unemployment Insurance ALL be privatizedwhile continuing to "cover" only > > > those older or sicker people who have no other means of surviving or of > > > getting first rate care. > > > > > The implications are rather OBVIOUS, but perhaps the author fails to see > > > his EMBRACE of socialism. > > > > > There is ALSO this from the same person: > > > Businesses or professions meeting licensing standards germane to the type > > > and scope of work such perform, and being regularly apprised of > > > substantive > > > new developments, may control their own work without governmental > > > sanction, > > > nor, once licensed, being required to be other than self-trained to > > > maintain > > > continuing competency for doing safe work within their chosen type. > > > Professionals qualified by training, testing and experience who perform > > > safe > > > and acceptable work within an area of their competency shall not be > > > sanctioned for being unlicensed in another job class or licensing > > > jurisdictionbeyond fair registration cost. No more than 25% of regulatory > > > board members shall have been employed in the profession or industry > > > regulated. > > > Again continuing to EMBRACE socialism. > > > > > It should no longer be a 'mystery' why this 'constitution' is NEVER fully > > > presented NOR that the author cannot support what drivel he presents. > > > <sigh> > > > Sad. > > > > > As noted, were you to actually PROVIDE the text ... one would see MORE > > > examples -- one might easily conclude THAT is essentially the reason you > > > refuse to present and merey proclaim. > > > > > Regard$, > > > --MJ > > > > > Much of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual legacy. It > > > has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught > > > many-inside > > > and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient facts or > > > contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the intellectual > > > process itself. This has been one of the sources of its enduring strength > > > as > > > a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and using political > > > power > > > in unbridled ways. -- Thomas Sowell > > > > > At 06:43 PM 3/22/2011, you wrote: > > > > > MJ: You are a deranged, socialist-communist who is clearly LYING about > > > the people-oriented content of my New Constitution! Please reference > > > a single location whereby intervention is allowed in how private > > > property is used. You can't do that, I'm sure! Ha, ha, HA! — John > > > A. Armistead — Patriot > > > > > On Mar 22, 1:03 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Capitalism is the FOUNDATION of a successful USA! You > > > > aren't telling me anything that I don't tout, daily. You are probably > > > > doing so to make the readers think it is you who have the right Ideas > > > > and I the converse. > > > > It only takes a cursory review of those pieces you have offered to see > > > how it fails to embrace capitalism -- much less utilize it as a > > > foundation. > > > > Capitalism is the system in which people are free to use their private > > > property without outside interference. > > > > Your 'constitution' is filled with intervention. > > > > Regard$, > > > > --MJ "Bureaucrats write memoranda both because they appear to be busy > > > when they are writing and because the memos, once written, immediately > > > become proof that they were busy" -- Charles Peters.If you agree with me > > > say > > > something like this: "I > > > > applaud your New Constitution! We need less, more efficient > > > > government and the return of lost civil liberties. Outlawing career > > > > politicians from Congress seems like a great place to start. Good > > > > luck in everything you are seeking to do for the good of the country! > > > > — J. A. Armistead — > > > > > > On Mar 21, 11:54 am, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > John, > > > > > > > eBay is a perfect example of capitalism at work. Over 2,000 > > > transactions > > > > > are performed every minute throughout the world with no need for > > > > > government. Both parties involved in those transactions report they > > > > > are > > > > > happy with the transaction 96% of the time. > > > > > > > There is no need for government involvement in commerce. > > > > > > > On 03/21/2011 07:15 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > Socialism and communism are the anti-thesis of a representative > > > > > > republic or a democracy. My New Constitution RETURNS civil > > > > > > liberties > > > > > > to the People and will fire, jail or hang those in government who > > > > > > support socialism and communism. When you attack my New > > > > > > Constitution > > > > > > with your "include me" talk, you are attacking THE most pro > > > capitalism > > > > > > and pro civil liberties person on the planet! Get lost, Jonathan! > > > � > > > > > > J. A. A. � > > > > > > On Mar 19, 10:57 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Civil liberties require government permission. As I choose to be a > > > free > > > > > >> sovereign, I do not consent. > > > > > > > >> As for free enterprise, I sell on eBay. No government interference, > > > 96% > > > > > >> successful transactions worldwide. That is as pro free enterprise > > > > > >> as > > > it > > > > > >> gets. > > > > > > > >> On 03/19/2011... > > read more »
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
