Works for me. Where were the "outraged", then? Dumb question. Sorry
On Mar 30, 11:35 am, the daily search <[email protected]> wrote: > Illegal? No. Stupid? Pretty much. > > > > On Tuesday, March 29, 2011 12:34:54 PM UTC-4, GregfromBoston wrote: > > > I saw it. > > > Is xenophobic (your word, not mine) speech now illegal? > > > No biggie with this, right? > > >http://justoneminute.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/bush_special_ir... > > > On Mar 29, 11:02 am, the daily search <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Banned cagw.org Commercial XenophobicFor the life of me, I can't > > understand > > > why the creators of this commercial (banned on some cable stations but > > not > > > all) don't get why it is offensive. It's like they have no clue what > > Xenophobia > > > is <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenophobia>. It's not even on their > > radar > > > screen so there is apparently no hesitation when they decide to portray > > the > > > Chinese as wanting to see America fail. For one to presume that, wouldn't > > > > one have to already be bought into a competitive outlook of our > > relationship > > > with China in the first place? Basically, CAGW.ORG is worried China has > > bad > > > intentions in their economic relationship with the U.S. and that it can > > only > > > be competitive in nature. Basically, admitting that the open economic > > ties > > > American corporations encouraged and got decades ago, enabling China to > > > produce goods for the world, has left us in debt to them. Before, when > > > America wasn't threatened by economic eclipse from China,... > > > > Read the rest: > >http://www.thedailysearch.com/2011/03/banned-cagworg-commercial-xenop...- > >Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
