Only Congressmen and federal reps are given the right to "Travel" between or within States of which they are not citizens.
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 9:10 AM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Naturalization, of course, is the acquisition of citizenship and > nationality by somebody who was not a citizen or national of that country > when he or she was born and has absolutely NOTHING to do with Immigration. > You actually PROVE the point as such would have been the ideal place to > provide such a power. > > Regard$, > --MJ > > Modern nationalism and collectivism have, by the restriction of migration, > perhaps come nearest to the "servile state." …Man can hardly be reduced more > to a mere wheel in the clockwork of the national collectivist state that > being deprived of his freedom to move.... Feeling that he belongs now to his > nation, body and soul, he will be more easily subdued to the obedient state > serf which nationalist and collectivist governments demand. -- Wilhelm Röpke > > > > > At 10:35 AM 4/30/2011, you wrote: > > The Constitution does not authorize the federal government to control > immigration. > ------------------------------------ > > Uhm, yes it does: > > The Congress shall have Power ... > > To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, Article 1, section 8 > > Next > > On Apr 30, 9:02 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > At 07:38 AM 4/30/2011, you wrote:Just another illegal alien waiting to be > deported by Republitards. > > ---- > > at it should ... our law says illegal aliens are to be deported > > they are criminals/parasites > > Actually, the Law of the Land provides no authority to the Congress to > make such laws in the first place. > > Regard$, > > --MJThe Constitution does not authorize the federal government to control > immigration. Nor does it say anything about illegal aliens. ... Sadly, > lawmakers have repeatedly interpreted this silence as license for > ill-conceived legislation. Congress began barring entry to the nation in > 1875 with prostitutes and convicts. Soon, all sorts of people fell short of > congressional glory: ex-convicts in 1882, along with Chinese citizens, > lunatics, and idiots. Paupers, polygamists, and people suffering from > infectious diseases or insanity made the list in 1891, while the illiterate > were banned in 1917. -- Becky Akers > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > <http://www.politicalforum.com/%A0> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- *Mark M. Kahle H.* * * * * -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
