Why Progressives Will Enjoy Atlas Shrugged, Part I May 2, 2011 http://www.tommullen.net/featured/why-progressives-will-enjoy-atlas-shrugged-part-i/
I had the opportunity to see Atlas Shrugged, Part I on Saturday in the only theater in which it is being shown in Tampa, FL. It is running at Cinebistro, a specialty theater where you can enjoy a high-end meal and fine wine served at your seat, which is very similar to a first class airline seat. Admittedly, it is just the kind of venue that progressives might associate with an elitist gathering of selfish capitalists. However, the movie itself tells quite a different story than they might expect if their understanding of Rand is limited to her interviews with Phil Donahue or Mike Wallace. Like libertarians, Rand’s Objectivist economic theory was rooted in what we today call “the non-aggression axiom,” which Thomas Jefferson and the liberal faction of America’s founders called “the law of nature.” According to this philosophy, each individual has an inalienable right to keep the product of his labor and to dispose of it as he sees fit. The non-aggression axiom forbids any individual or group from using force to take away the justly acquired property of another. Neither does it allow for anyone to interfere with voluntary contracts, as long as those contracts do not involve the initiation of force against anyone else. This prohibits the government, which is by definition the societal use of force, from redistributing wealth or enacting laws which go beyond prohibiting aggression. Establishment media figures who interviewed Rand immediately focused on the implications of her philosophy for social safety net programs, charging that Rand’s philosophy would not allow for programs for the poor or handicapped. While this is true, it obscures the most important implications of Rand’s philosophy for economic policy in the United States. What would likely startle progressives watching the film is its emphasis on the evils of what free market proponents would call “crony capitalism.” This is completely consistent with the novel, which demonstrates that the beneficiaries of government regulation supposedly enacted for “the common good” or “the benefit of society” are really the super-rich. Indeed, the film never criticizes the beneficiaries of social programs. Instead, it spends all of its time demonstrating the difference between those “capitalists” who acquire their wealth through government privileges and those true capitalists who acquire their wealth by producing products that consumers voluntarily buy. This is a crucial distinction that has eluded progressives from Woodrow Wilson to Michael Moore. After seeing Moore’s film, *Capitalism: A Love Story*, I pointed out in my review of that film<http://www.tommullen.net/featured/michael-moore-wants-to-end-the-fed-he-just-doesnt-realize-it/>that there was very little that libertarians would disagree with. All of Moore’s criticisms of what he calls capitalism are really the result of crony capitalism. The biggest culprit in the economic collapse of the last decade was the Federal Reserve, a central planning/wealth redistribution institution that Rand explicitly condemns in her novel. Unfortunately, Moore incorrectly concludes that the economic distortions, inequitable distribution of wealth, and widespread harm to middle and lower income Americans were the result of a free market. Rand would agree completely with progressives on the injustice of today’s American corporate state. That might also surprise progressives who probably assume that Rand would have supported the mainstream Republican policies of George W. Bush. Not only would Rand have condemned Bush’s version of state capitalism, but she was openly critical of Republican hero Ronald Reagan. When asked by Phil Donahue about Reagan during his administration, Rand said in so many words that he should have stuck to acting. The only opportunity that progressives might have to disagree with anything in the film is the portrayal of the labor union official who tries to sabotage Dagny Taggarts launch of a new railroad line. This encounter takes all of about 3 minutes of the 113 minute film and is not a condemnation of labor unions in principle, but rather the illegitimate power that corrupt union officials can wield because of government privileges. However, the true villains in the film are not union officials, beneficiaries of entitlement programs, or any other group associated with progressive philosophy. The villains are exclusively corporate executives and the government officials they get in bed with to illegitimately acquire wealth. The heroes are those who acquire their wealth by productive achievement and voluntary exchange. If one had to sum the film up in one sentence, it is an effective demonstration of the evils of crony capitalism and its difference from a truly free market. I encourage progressives to see this film and to read Rand’s novel. If there is one thing that I hope they take away, it is that even great wealth can be acquired legitimately, when it is the result of human beings trading the products of their labor with the mutual, voluntary consent of all parties. Once progressives begin making the distinction between legitimately acquired wealth and wealth acquired because of government privilege, they will find libertarians and all other proponents of truly free markets standing by their side, fighting the evil corporate state. *Check out Tom Mullen’s book, A Return to Common Sense: Reawakening Liberty in the Inhabitants of America. Right Here!*<http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0578006839?ie=UTF8&tag=tomusbl-20&linkCode=xm2&camp=1789&creativeASIN=0578006839> *Home* <http://www.tommullen.net/> © Thomas Mullen 2011 Filed Under: Corporations<http://www.tommullen.net/category/economics/corporations/>, Economics <http://www.tommullen.net/category/economics/>, Featured<http://www.tommullen.net/category/featured/>, Non-Aggression Principle<http://www.tommullen.net/category/natural-law/non-aggression-principle/>, Political Philosophy<http://www.tommullen.net/category/political-philosophy/>, Progressivism<http://www.tommullen.net/category/political-philosophy/progressivism/>, Property Rights<http://www.tommullen.net/category/natural-law/property-rights/> __._,_.___ Reply to sender<[email protected]?subject=Re%3A%20Why%20Progressives%20Will%20Enjoy%20Atlas%20Shrugged>| Reply to group<[email protected]?subject=Re%3A%20Why%20Progressives%20Will%20Enjoy%20Atlas%20Shrugged>| Reply via web post<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Individual-Sovereignty/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJyY2YyZXQyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzI0MjA3MzcEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzAzMjkyBG1zZ0lkAzIzNjI2NgRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNycGx5BHN0aW1lAzEzMDQ4NjUwODI-?act=reply&messageNum=236266>| Start a New Topic<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Individual-Sovereignty/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNDk2cGFpBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzI0MjA3MzcEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzAzMjkyBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA250cGMEc3RpbWUDMTMwNDg2NTA4Mg--> Messages in this topic<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Individual-Sovereignty/message/236266;_ylc=X3oDMTM4cmRuM3JyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzI0MjA3MzcEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzAzMjkyBG1zZ0lkAzIzNjI2NgRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawN2dHBjBHN0aW1lAzEzMDQ4NjUwODIEdHBjSWQDMjM2MjY2>( 1) Recent Activity: - New Members<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Individual-Sovereignty/members;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZDZtMzluBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzI0MjA3MzcEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzAzMjkyBHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZtYnJzBHN0aW1lAzEzMDQ4NjUwODI-?o=6> 1 Visit Your Group<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Individual-Sovereignty;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNGR1bHU0BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzI0MjA3MzcEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzAzMjkyBHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZnaHAEc3RpbWUDMTMwNDg2NTA4Mg--> Report any problems, suggestions or abuse to [email protected] [image: Yahoo! Groups]<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJkbTE1amc0BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzI0MjA3MzcEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MzAzMjkyBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2dmcARzdGltZQMxMzA0ODY1MDgy> Switch to: Text-Only<[email protected]?subject=Change+Delivery+Format:+Traditional>, Daily Digest<[email protected]?subject=Email+Delivery:+Digest>• Unsubscribe<[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>• Terms of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . __,_._,___ -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
