*John, INLINE:*
On 05/19/2011 01:47 PM, NoEinstein wrote:> Dear Jonathan:
(1.) Most in the media considered Donald Trump to be a contender for
President. You, an anarchist, aren't bright enough to know the
present, let alone project the way future events could have played
out.
*I do not care what "most in the media" decided for YOU. Donald Trump
never declared himself to be a candidate. Who are you going to believe?
The media? Or, Donald Trump?*
Answer to (2.) is at *** in the preface, copied below:
"Preface:
The Will of the People is the foundation of government. The
People must be represented faithfully and without bias so that
government can properly and efficiently perform its functions in the
coming ages. Federal government shall be limited to functions that
cannot be better performed by local and state governments. Such shall
be the enabler of freedom, justice, fair commerce, climates of
opportunity, cooperative efforts, and national security both internal
and external. Such shall be businesslike yet human; impartial yet
focused; considerate of our environment, heritage, peace and
tranquillity; effective without boastfulness; *** and divorced from
politics. The federal government shall not be considered to be
synonymous with the USA, and those therein are not a ruling class nor
are they dictators; rather they are the servants of the USA and shall
be answerable to it and to any law-abiding Citizen or Citizens
thereof. We honor these objectives for the benefit of our-selves and
our posterity."
*I am assuming you have just posted the preface to YOUR New
Constitution. Once again, you are guilty of obfuscation. You did not
answer my question. Where in the Constitution (the existing one - not
YOURS) does it prohibit political parties?*> (3.) In my New Constitution
the 'speaker' is simply a parliamentarian
who happens to be presiding. That person shall have no power to
direct the course of proceedings based on their personal biases. This
is the sentence which you neglected to copy:
" The House makes the rules for its proceedings, punishes disorderly
members, and with the assent of 60% can expel a member for a
violation. ***But no rule shall be made that concentrates power in
any individual(s) beyond his or her one vote." That excludes allowing
the speaker, or chairmen of any committees, to have any more 'power'
than the members have.
*What does YOUR New Constitution have to do with reality?*> (4.) The Secret
Service wasn't part of government during the earlier
years. It is required in the Constitution that candidates for
President be natural born citizens of the USA and at least 35 years
old. All members of the Secret service are required to take an oath
to uphold the Constitution. If such deliberately and flagrantly
overlook CRIMINALITY that is hugely harmful to the USA�the way all
socialist-communist policies are�then members of the S. S. who are
responsible, likewise, shall be guilty of treason, for giving aid and
comfort to the ENEMY (socialists and communists)! Since the
Constitution is the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, deliberately violating
that law for the obvious purpose of SUBVERTING the Constitution and
causing the failure of our economic systems is TREASON of the highest
order! Barack H. Obama should be hanged post haste!
*The Constitution states, "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a
Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this
Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither
shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained
to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident
within the United States."* *Unfortunately, that same Constitution
offers no insight as to what constitutes a "natural born citizen" or how
such provision shall be enforced. That the Secret Service was not
created until 1865 (to suppress counterfeit currency) should be evidence
enough that they have no responsibility for determining the eligibility
of the POTUS. *
� John A. Armistead � Patriot
On May 19, 1:22 pm, Jonathan<[email protected]> wrote:
John,
As usual, I have some comments and questions (which you will no doubt
avoid answering, as usual):
1) Reality check: Donald Trump was never in "the race."
2) Where in the Constitution does it prohibit political parties?
3) "Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings..." As such,
the House has chosen to elect a Speaker. This would prompt most people
to call that person Speaker, much as most would call the head of a local
PTA "Madam President."
4) Does any part of the Constitution or any Law require the Secret
Service to look into the qualifications of the President? "The mission
of the United States Secret Service is to safeguard the nation's
financial infrastructure and payment systems to preserve the integrity
of the economy, and to protect national leaders, visiting heads of state
and government, designated sites and National Special Security Events."
On 05/18/2011 07:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
A huge number of the na�ve among us are probably supposing that the
USA can be saved if we can just elect the right President. Our
Republican choices include those who have already sold their souls to
the lock-step rituals and the Pomp and Circumstance of Washington.
The same, typical, ego-maniacs, are content to form committees to
raise outlandish amounts of capital for waging months-long battles in�
the primaries. None of those same presidential hopefuls have a enough
practical sensibility to see that pressing-the-flesh in as many states
as possible is more of a disqualification than a qualification to be
President.
As many as 18% of Americans are unemployed or underemployed. The rock
hard, leftist Democrats for Obama are projected to be able to raise
over a billion dollars to get that traitor to America re elected. If,
as I�ve proposed, presidential candidates spend no more than five
million dollars on their campaigns, *** there can be, literally,
billions of dollars that can remain in the pockets of the voters,
rather than going to our close-to-universally-corrupt media. A huge
plus will be the suspension of the unconstitutional, spaced-out
primaries that give the most power to the voters of Iowa and etc.
When the primaries are suspended, there will be no more
unconstitutional party conventions such as gave us our Manchurian
Candidate, Barack Hussein Obama of Kenya. Once and for all there will
be an end to the unconstitutional political parties which have �split
the USA down the aisle� for far too long.
Voters should have no trouble choosing good choices for President
based simply on televised debates and fairly-formatted candidate
interviews. The entire election process should span no more than six
months, and the candidates can stay rested, rather than being frazzled
by the stupidity of jetting back and forth on the pretext of being
better able to� �serve� the people of the particular state they happen
to be in better than he or she can serve the citizens of a dozen other
states where the same dull speech was recited before.
With �give-�em-hell� Donald Trump out of the race, I�m not sure there
is a single presidential hopeful wise enough and practical enough to
Kick the Ass of the Entire Primary System! It only takes ONE brave
candidate to do that. Simply say: �The primaries give inequitable
power to the voters in the early primaries. That makes the spaced-out
primaries unconstitutional, as it does the party conventions that
follow. Nothing in the Constitution allows quasi-governmental bodies,
like our political parties, to have ANY say-so whatsoever in how
governmental processes are run. In a Republic, like the USA is so
clearly mandated to be, there can be no LEADERS in Congress! Every
representative, regardless of how recently he or she was elected,
shall have identical voting power. To call Newt Gingrich �Mr.
Speaker� is to create ROYALTY in Congress that was so detested by the
founding fathers. George Washington rejected the idea that he should
be king! And George Washington would reject the notion that Czars
under the control of the President can bypass the powers granted to
Congress alone.
Thus far, the �Ritual� of the Secret Service protecting the (gag)
President is preventing them from asking this simple question: Is the
�long form� birth certificate of Obama�which was posted on the
Internet in digital form�a LAYERED *. pdf file? If there are LAYERS,
then, that document is a definite forgery. I repeat: Is the �long
form� birth certificate of Obama�which was posted on the Internet in
digital form�a LAYERED *. pdf file? If the answer is confirmed to be
