On May 20, 8:16 pm, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > Like I said, contorted and tortured logic. Can you name me ONE > insurance YOU pay into where you KNOW you CAN'T ever make a claim or > receive a benefit from?
I never said they couldn't collect on a claim... they first have to meet the requirements of proof they need it. > You don't buy car insurance if you don't drive. > You don't buy homeowner insurance if you don't own a home. You don't pay into SS if you don't work either. > You buy insurance to ensure that, should a certain condition occur, you > can receive compensation for it. Exactly. Thanks for making my point, and glad your seeing it my way. > Under your system the conditions > under which one would receive compensation from this 'insurance' can > not exist if that individual is wealthy. Because they have no basis to make a claim. > What it is, once you take off > the blue glasses, is redistribution of wealth poorly disguised as > 'insurance'. It has nothing to do with redistribution, that's the nature of insurance whether private or otherwise. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
