he is certainly not defending the United States, guarding U.S. shores, securing U.S. borders, patrolling U.S. coasts, and enforcing no-fly zones over U.S. skies. ---- make no mistake ... soldiers who go abroad to kill their assigned enemy are not serving America
We can dismiss a buffoon and opportunist like Rudy Giuliani for equating Osama bin Laden with Hitler ----- Giuliani is a zionist first know the enemy On May 25, 9:49 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > A Christian Killer Par Excellenceby Laurence M. VanceAs I wrote in "Christian > Killers" way back in 2004, the phrase ought to be just as perplexing as > Christian adulterers, Christian drug addicts, Christian prostitutes, > Christian pimps, Christian gangsta rappers, or Christian acid rockers. > A Christian fighting the bogus war on terror in Iraq and Afghanistan while in > the "service" of the U.S. military is a Christian killer. He is not a hero. > He is not defending our freedoms. He is not protecting the United States. He > is not fighting "over there" so we won’t have to fight "over here." He is not > avenging the 9/11 attacks. He is not keeping American safe from terrorists. > He is not ensuring that we continue to speak English. He is not guaranteeing > our First Amendment rights. He is not fighting for truth, justice, and the > American way. > And he is certainly not defending the United States, guarding U.S. shores, > securing U.S. borders, patrolling U.S. coasts, and enforcing no-fly zones > over U.S. skies. > We can dismiss a buffoon and opportunist likeRudy Giulianifor equating Osama > bin Laden with Hitler and saying that he "wanted to be the one" to kill him > since he is better known as adrag queenthan a Christian. > But what are we to make of Doug Giles, a conservative Christian columnist > forTownHall.comand the "senior pastor" ofClash Church, meeting inside the > Residence Inn in Aventura, Florida? > Giles is a Christian killer par excellence. He is nota Christian warmonger on > steroidsand he is notthe greatest Christian warmonger of all time, but he is > a Christian killer par excellence. > Giles is the author of the article "Why Christians Should Rejoice That UBL Is > Dead and in Hell." I am reproducing his entire article, not only because it > is short, but because it has to be read in its entirety to be believed:Let me > go on the record stating that as a Christian I am completely cool with our > Navy SEAL Team Six killing Usama. Or is it Osama? Does anyone know? I heard > he liked it both ways. Anyway, the only thing that makes me sad about bin > Laden’s death, as an orthodox Christian, is that a). It didn’t happen on > Christmas or Easter, and b). The rude SEAL Team Six didn’t include me along > to pull the trigger.Apparently, the SEALs require those who go on their > missions to be physically and psychologically fit to the nth degree and stuff > – y’know, like being able to swim like Esther Williams during a hurricane > with a wildebeest strapped to one’s back. When they told me that, I was like, > "Whatever." And the SEALs were like, "Pfff." And thus they chose someone else > to whack that wacky bastard. So, I guess I’ll have to settle for seconds and > wait to play the forthcoming Xbox video game based on the Abbottabad raid > entitled, SEAL Team Six: Who’s Yo’ Mama, Usama? But I digress.So, why do I > bring up my Christianity in conjunction with my satisfaction with Usama > getting capped? Well, it’s principally because of the rank anti-biblical > bollocks coming from pastors and priests who believe that Christians should > not be happy that bin Laden has now been eaten by groupers at the bottom of > the Indian Ocean (or wherever the heck they tossed his damnable corpse).For > instance, Bill O’Reilly had a Catholic priest, Father Beck, on his show this > past week who not only said we should dial down on our biblical joy that this > evil SOB was shot but that we should’ve "loved him," "forgiven him," and "not > judged him" because "we don’t know what was in Usama’s wittle heart that > caused him to kill tens of thousands of people worldwide."To hear this cat > talk, it sounds like all UBL simply needed was some Xanax, a new coloring > book and a little face time with Dr. Drew because his daddy didn’t love him > enough or something.Well, Father Crock – I mean Beck – call me a heretic > because I believe those commands to "love, forgive and not judge" don’t > extend to a sick, twisted, violent, God-hating, woman abusing, implacable, > wicked dog like bin Laden but rather to personal verbal detractors of one’s > faith (y’know, people who don’t pose a grave global security threat. > Duh).Giles is a Christian killer par excellence because he doesn’t even think > it necessary to put on a military uniform before he blows someone away, in > the name of the Lord, of course. > Now, I make no apologies for Osama bin Laden. I deplore any acts of terrorism > he may have planned, instigated, attempted, inspired, or carried out. I > repudiate his religion, his invective, and any evil he may have thought, > spoken, or performed. I even abhor his unkempt beard. > (The preceding paragraph is for those who planned on e-mailing me about how I > am a defender of bin Laden, pro-Muslim, insensitive to the families who lost > loved ones on 9/11, and/or an America-hating liberal scumbag.) > Although I believe that bin Laden was evil, I am not stupid enough to think, > like Rudy Giuliani, that bin Laden should be equated with Hitler or Stalin. I > also believe that Bush, Obama, the vast majority of the members of Congress, > and the leadership of both major political parties are evil, but I would > never make the mistake of likening any of them to Hitler or Stalin. > Giles charges bin Laden with killing tens of thousands of people worldwide. I > think he is confusing him with George W. Bush. > It is sad to see that nothing has brought out patriotism in Americans like > the murder of someone they don’t like. Yet, most Americans that cheered the > Seal Team Death Squad for assassinating Osama bin Laden in the same breath > mentioned the terrorist attacks of 9/11. But when has the U.S. government > ever actually laid out the evidence that bin Laden was connected with 9/11? > On the FBI’sTen Most Wantedlist, there is no connection given between bin > Laden and 9/11:Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, > 1998, bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and > Nairobi, Kenya. These attacks killed over 200 people. In addition, Bin Laden > is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world.Bin Laden also > appears on the FBI’sMost Wanted Terroristslist. Again, there is no mention of > his connection with the attacks of 9/11. > When asked about this curious omission, FBI spokesmanRex Tombsaid: "The > reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is > because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11." > President Bush rejected an offer in 2001 by the Taliban to turn over bin > Laden to a neutral country for trial if the United States presented evidence > that he was responsible for the 9/11 attacks.Bush refused and said: "There’s > no need to discuss innocence or guilt. We know he’s guilty." > In aninterviewwith bin Laden first published on September 28, 2001, he denied > any involvement in the 9/11 attacks:I have already said that I am not > involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try > my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I > consider the killing of innocent women, children, and other humans as an > appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, > children, and other people.Whoever committed the act of 11 September are not > the friends of the American people. I have already said that we are against > the American system, not against its people, whereas in these attacks, the > common American people have been killed.Was bin Laden lying? Perhaps. But he > is certainly more believable than thelyingGeorge WMD Bush. > But even if bin Laden planned every detail of the 9/11 attacks himself, the > perpetrators of those attacks died with their victims. Is there any evidence > that bin Laden directly killed anyone? He may have killed Soviet soldiers > when they invaded Afghanistan while supplied with weapons by the CIA, but he > was applauded as a freedom fighter back then. > Rick Giles also maintains that bin Laden posed a grave global security > threat. This was a threat of our making. For years U.S. foreign policy has > been aggressive, reckless, belligerent, interventionist, and meddling. U.S. > foreign policy sows discord among nations, stirs up strife where none > existed, intensifies the hatred that many foreigners around the world have > for Americans and each other, and creates terrorists faster than we can kill > them. > And perhaps someone should tell Christian killer par excellence "Pastor" > Giles that rejoicing in the damnation of another soul is not a Christian > attitude, though I suspect that his grasp of Christianity isn’t any better > than his knowledge of U.S. foreign > policy.http://lewrockwell.com/vance/vance244.html -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
