http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/05/24/its-all-your-money-foreign-aid-muslimarab-nations?test=latestnews?test=latestnews


It's All Your Money: Foreign Aid to Muslim/Arab
nations<http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/05/24/its-all-your-money-foreign-aid-muslimarab-nations>

by William 
LaJeunesse<http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/contributors/william-lajeunesse>|
May 24, 2011

   -

While America's standing in the Middle
East<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/middle-east.htm#r_src=ramp>couldn't
get much lower, you wouldn't know it looking at the U.S. foreign
aid budget. Of proposed U.S. assistance for 2012, almost two-thirds is
earmarked for Muslim nations and one-third goes to Arab countries.

Yet, despite those billions in aid, opinion polls show most Arab citizens
still have an unfavorable view of America and most Muslim nations routinely
vote against U.S. interests in the United
Nations<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/united-nations.htm#r_src=ramp>
.

"If we are giving money to countries consistently voting against our
interest, we ought to cut them off," says Congressman Steve Chabot (R-OH)
who sits on the House Foreign Affairs Committee. "But Congress is going to
need to get some backbone here because it consistently gives Presidents the
ability to waive the cutoff of that money."

Years ago, U.N. Ambassador John Bolton proposed cutting off all aid to the
30 nations who consistently voted against the U.S. in the UN. Before him,
President Reagan's U.N. Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick proposed cutting off $1
million in aid for each vote an aid recipient cast against the U.S. in the
U.N. In both cases, Bolton says the State
Department<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/state-department.htm#r_src=ramp>overruled
them.

"Foreign aid to a lot of countries could be readily cut and I think it's
been a mistake by the U.S. government for decades not to take U.N. voting
into account," Bolton said Monday.

This document <http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/162418.pdf>,
released by the State
Department<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/state-department.htm#r_src=ramp>,
examines 13 critical votes in the UN in 2010.

Compare that to this list of US aid recipients for
2012<http://www.usaid.gov/performance/cbj/158269.pdf>and this
poll released last week by the Pew Research Center Global Attitudes
Project<http://pewglobal.org/files/2011/05/Pew-Global-Attitudes-Arab-Spring-FINAL-May-17-2011.pdf>
.

The result: some of the largest recipients of U.S. taxpayer money over the
last 6 budget years consistently vote against the U.S. and harbor negative
or unfavorable views of America.

[image:
http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/sites/politics.blogs.foxnews.com/files/Graphic_1.JPG]

 Some other Muslim countries show almost no friendship or allegiance to the
U.S. but continue to see the State Department shower them with money.

Algeria <http://www.foxnews.com/topics/algeria.htm#r_src=ramp> has received
$60 million and votes with the U.S. just 16% of the time.
Oman<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/oman.htm#r_src=ramp>$74 million,
18% voting coincidence. Whereas the Palestinian Territories
received $3 billion dollars yet just 18% have a favorable view of the U.S.

"The U.S. has to quit being kicked around. We need to quit sending our tax
dollars to countries that do not have our best interests in mind, especially
in these economic times," says Chabot.

Instead, if you look at U.S. aid over time, it's largely on auto-pilot. Once
a nation is on the U.S. gravy train, few are ever cut off, regardless of
their loyalty, gratitude or actions.

This link <http://foreignassistance.gov/ObjectiveView.aspx> allows you to
see who gets aid and where it goes.

In our analysis of the numbers, of the President's 2012 foreign assistance
request of $34.5 billion, 60% or $20.1 billion goes to Muslim nations, or
those where a majority practice Islam. About 33% or the total budget, or
$11.6 billion is awarded to Arab countries.

And while many Americans think most U.S. foreign aid goes to "humanitarian
assistance" or food and medicine for the poor, an analysis shows 80% of our
aid to Arab countries pays for police and the military. And despite the
President's speech last week calling for closer ties with Middle Eastern
nations and fostering free market, democratic principles, just 5% of our aid
to the region is dedicated to 'economic development'.

While some suggest our support for repressive, autocratic regimes explains
America's poor poll numbers, and should be discontinued, Bolton has a
different view.

While conceding a reform of U.S. foreign aid is "way overdue" he says, "I
don't think the opinions you see in foreign countries should govern where
the aid goes. It should be based on what is in our interest not what is in
their interest."



Read more:
http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/05/24/its-all-your-money-foreign-aid-muslimarab-nations?test=latestnews?test=latestnews#ixzz1NPFSXiMN

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

<<image003.jpg>>

Reply via email to