Dear MJ: What qualifies you to sit is judgment? Because Political Forum requires that only members can reply, that prevents the majority of readers from getting a voice. Also, since I must take so much flack from jealous ones like you and Jonathan, people stay mum to avoid getting picked on by you maniacs. MJ, cut out the over-sized words and proof your replies, and I might be more considerate of your ideas. — J. A. A. — > On Jun 2, 9:34 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > You miss the point AND you are likely too close to see in the detail that has > been provided you. > You have stated a goal of X. You presented words that purport to meet X. > Members of this forum have pointed at and elucidated for you how those words > you presented and imagine fulfill X simply do not. Some have gone further to > modify those words so that they might actually fulfill that stated goal. > Lots of people cling desperately regardless of home many times they are shown > to be incorrect. It hardly seems keeping with you overall goal to IGNORE > reality with impunity. > Regard$, > --MJ > "No socialist author ever gave a thought to the possibility that the abstract > entity which he wants to vest with unlimited power -- whether it is called > humanity, society, nation, state, or government -- could act in a way of > which he himself disapproves." -- Ludwig von MisesAt 08:25 PM 5/26/2011, you > wrote:J. Ashley: As you should well know, I willingly explain my New > Constitution. But I am its author, and I alone determine its > content. There shall never be a "debate phase" that allows an > anarchist like you to have any say-so on anything! — J. A. A. — > >
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
