**
<http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/author/doctorbulldog/> Obama
Administration Wants You to Give Up Your Passwords to Aid in Prosecuting
You!<http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/2011/07/11/obama-administration-wants-you-to-give-up-your-passwords-to-aid-in-prosecuting-you/>
*doctorbulldog <http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/author/doctorbulldog/>* |
11 July, 2011 at 1:48 pm | Categories: Abuse of
Power<http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/?cat=62866>,
Obama Sucks <http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/?cat=5183334>,
Orwellian<http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/?cat=326029>,
politics <http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/?cat=398>, U.S.
Constitution<http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/?cat=51155>| URL:
http://wp.me/p1NPg-7f7
*This is sheer Orwellian insanity! The Fifth Amendment clearly states that
no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against
himself." By being forced to give up your passwords, you are being
compelled to be a witness against yourself:*
<http://doctorbulldog.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/password-protection.jpg>
*DOJ: We can force you to decrypt that laptop*
*by Declan McCullagh - CNET
News<http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20078312-281/doj-we-can-force-you-to-decrypt-that-laptop/>
*
The Colorado prosecution of a woman accused of a mortgage scam will test
whether the government can punish you for refusing to disclose your
encryption passphrase.
*The Obama administration has asked a federal judge to order the defendant,
Ramona Fricosu, to decrypt an encrypted laptop* that police found in her
bedroom during a raid of her home.
Because Fricosu has opposed the proposal, this could turn into a
precedent-setting case. No U.S. appeals court appears to have ruled on
whether such an order would be legal or not under the U.S. Constitution's
Fifth Amendment, which broadly protects Americans' right to remain silent.
In a brief filed last Friday, Fricosu's Colorado Springs-based attorney,
Philip Dubois, said defendants can't be constitutionally obligated to help
the government interpret their files. "If agents execute a search warrant
and find, say, a diary handwritten in code, could the target be compelled to
decode, i.e., decrypt, the diary?"
To the U.S. Justice Department, though, the requested court order represents
a simple extension of prosecutors' long-standing ability to assemble
information that could become evidence during a trial. The department
claims:
Public interests will be harmed absent requiring defendants to make
available unencrypted contents in circumstances like these. Failing to
compel Ms. Fricosu amounts to a concession to her and potential criminals
(be it in child exploitation, national security, terrorism, financial crimes
or drug trafficking cases) that encrypting all inculpatory digital evidence
will serve to defeat the efforts of law enforcement officers to obtain such
evidence through judicially authorized search warrants, and thus make their
prosecution impossible.
*Yeah. Progressive Commies ALWAYS play the "child exploitation" card
whenever they are about to strip you of your rights. Funny, but I don't
recall Obama and Eric Holder as being particularly concerned about halting
the abhorrent practice of killing unborn children.*
Prosecutors stressed that they don't actually require the passphrase itself,
meaning Fricosu would be permitted to type it in and unlock the files
without anyone looking over her shoulder. They say they want only the
decrypted data and are not demanding "the password to the drive, either
orally or in written form."
*Semantics, semantics. Regardless of whether or not a citizen secretly
types in the password or outright gives the password to the prosecution, the
results are the same: Forced self-incrimination.*
The question of whether a criminal defendant can be legally compelled to
cough up his encryption passphrase remains an unsettled one, with law review
articles for at least the last 15 years arguing the merits of either
approach. (A U.S. Justice Department attorney wrote an article in 1996, for
instance, titled "Compelled Production of Plaintext and Keys.")
Much of the discussion has been about what analogy comes closest.
Prosecutors tend to view PGP passphrases as akin to someone possessing a key
to a safe filled with incriminating documents. That person can, in general,
be legally compelled to hand over the key. Other examples include the U.S.
Supreme Court saying that defendants can be forced to provide fingerprints,
blood samples, or voice recordings.
On the other hand are civil libertarians citing other Supreme Court cases
that conclude Americans can't be forced to give "compelled testimonial
communications" and extending the legal shield of the Fifth Amendment to
encryption passphrases. Courts already have ruled that that such protection
extends to the contents of a defendant's mind, so why shouldn't a passphrase
be shielded as well?
Read more of this
post<http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/2011/07/11/obama-administration-wants-you-to-give-up-your-passwords-to-aid-in-prosecuting-you/#more-27845>
Add a comment to this
post<http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/2011/07/11/obama-administration-wants-you-to-give-up-your-passwords-to-aid-in-prosecuting-you/#respond>
[image: WordPress]
WordPress.com <http://wordpress.com/> | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage
Subscriptions<http://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=5d39acfd19218362d540a3fc3dc3315d&email=baconlard%40gmail.com>|
Unsubscribe<http://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=5d39acfd19218362d540a3fc3dc3315d&email=baconlard%40gmail.com&b=LC%3D4%2F%3DxFp9QgH%3DWHH_.QcrwF.j8d4%3FmM%2B.oeUqmpX5GBDwJMSn>|
Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post
by Email <http://support.wordpress.com/post-by-email/> feature.
*Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:*
http://subscribe.wordpress.com
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
