Sir,
At your townhall meeting on Sunday 17July, i asked you a few questions and
your answers, though honest (i hope) were not sufficient in content. So i ask
them again, giving you the opportunity to research your answers.
Let's start with something easy. Is the federation of states referred to
as the United States of America still working under the contract ratified in
1787? A simple question, requiring a simple answer. Yes or no. No other
comments are needed at the moment.
We can all pretty much agree that the federation governing body is spending
way too much money. We can also pretty much agree that one should be
compensated for work performed. With the need for the federation governing
body to cut it's spending, will you be taking a voluntary pay/perk cut?
Assuming we ARE still working under the contract mentioned earlier, "All
Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of
Representatives;"{ARticle I, section 7, paragraph 1} so how does the Senate
Constitutionally justify deficit spending? Granted, spending is not revenue,
but the separation was placed to insure that no one branch would make law that
cost the citizen more than his Representative agreed to. Therefore, by deficit
spending, the Senate has determined that the House will raise revenue whether
it is a good idea or not.
Does your Office of Senator for Oregon view the USC (United States Code)
as the code of law for the United States or for the United States of America?
If it is for the United States, which the Congress has exclusive Legislative
power over {Article I, Section 8, paragraph 17}, then isn't compelling the
states to abide by such law against said contract?
Speaking of the USC, why does it include WashingtonDC, Peurto Rico,
Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession as a state, in direct
conflict with the Constitution for these United States of America? And what
does your office intend to do to correct this unlawful event?
And finally, for the moment, if Congress did NOT declare war against Lybia,
and the initial NATO attack was NOT in DIRECT response to an attack on one of
these United States of America, and the attack of Pearl Harbor was an act of
war on the part of the Nipponese, WHY is Mr. Obama not being impeached and
tried for treason?
sign me
daniel karl seigler, born in Fort Benning, Cussetta County, Georgia, son of
Clarance Roland O'Neil Seigler, born in Ozark, Dale County, Alabama, son of
Thomas Malcolm Seigler, born somewhere in Alabama
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
