On Jul 29, 12:05 pm, Morpheal <[email protected]> wrote: > LARGER IMPLICATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES BUDGET CRISIS: > > It is amazing how backward United States politics can sometimes > become.
FINALLY, someone willing to move the debt BACKWARDS! >When Congress has to pay debt & fund adequate programs & > services, it bogs down in revenue arguments. It isn't congress who pays, we the people pay >Actually its lawful duty > is to adequacy of provision, not simply provision, of whatever is > determined to be necessary to the “general welfare” of the United > States. Now THERE is a broad term, and I bet you define it way different than I do. > The founding fathers of > the Constitutional republic, educated as they were in what could be > known, and was considered relevant, at that time, wisely thought it > best to understand “general welfare” as being what is both necessary & > sufficient to assure the basic ideals of the Declaration of > Independence. Emphasis on the word "basic" >The United States is understood clearly as “we the > people”, meaning all of the people, leaving no legal room to leave > anyone out in any discriminatory or prejudicial manner. That > pertaining to the enabling of the preservation of life, liberty, and > the pursuit of happiness of every person, by whatever means necessary > to that effect. You added "by whatever means necessary", don't lie > If something were imperiling lives, reasonable > liberties, or the chance to pursuit of happiness of any Americans, > then it was necessary to find sufficient government remedy to that > cause, by means of government expenditures on what would preserve the > lofty ideals enshrined in the founding documents of the Republic. The government debt is imperiling lives >Much of that seems far too forgotten, I would say "twisted beyond recognition" by people like you > Cutting programs and services, as a means to “balancing the budget” > and “reducing the debt” is essentially backward thinking. Only to IDIOTS who can't grasp basic math and basic economics > In that intent was a socialism, meant to provide for all Americans > equally, Bullshit > America’s socialism has claimed that Marxism is flawed, in contrast to > its own system, based on its own Constitution, but the results of that > claim now remain to be proven They all failed, what proof do you need? >& some in the world are predicting > America’s failure with Marxism, and Marxist influenced ideology > winning out in the larger theater of international, globalized > politics. Not a chance in hell > Robert Ezergailis > Hamilton, Canada Stay in Canada, mind your own business -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
