No, It simply started there. On Aug 17, 11:44 am, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote: > What we will soon have is “one law, one nation, one force” that will > preclude any state Sovereignty. > --- > that was resolved in 1865 > > what we now have are anti-American politicians nation building around > the globe and giving our wealth away to foreign nations > > it's time to replace them with honorable Americans asap by any means > necessary > > On Aug 17, 12:35 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > The talking heads on all sides are now telling us what we want to hear > > in the upcoming elections and pointing out and denigrating those that > > do not comply with their appointed political guidelines. (Perry > > comment on the traitorous actions of Bernanke) > > > What a crock ! > > > What I want to hear is a candidate that has principals that has at > > least a modicum of honesty and will help return the US to a smaller, > > constitutionally compliant smaller Government; One that recognizes the > > true Sovereignty of the several states. > > > Let’s start with the Federal watering down of the States and what made > > them so special. > > Each was founded by different segments of society with different > > manners, morals and ideals. They gathered in clumps like that and > > immigrated to specific areas of the nation in order to live freely in > > a like minded community with its own laws geared to those ideals. The > > idea of the Federal government and those that find one state was/is > > somehow different, better or worse than another was and is to kill > > those differences. > > > Now that is really tough, Rhode Island is all about business and Iowa > > is all about corn; not only are there differences but for each to do > > what it does best there must be differences in all aspects of life and > > accepted practices. The Feds and those elected seem to think that this > > is just not so. > > > The founders knew it had to be so. > > > To point this out and name the names that think otherwise is no longer > > considered good politics. It is considered to be anti-American as if > > there is a single definition as to what an American is….there is not. > > In all the history of the USA the ONLY time that the states seem to > > agree on everything is when a single threat from outside affects them > > all. This was true until the US decided to enter into foreign wars on > > a regular basis. Now that which once made the USA strong and a beacon > > to the world is considered unpatriotic and un-American. > > > What we will soon have is “one law, one nation, one force” that will > > preclude any state Sovereignty. What we will have is a lack of > > competition between the states for commerce and ideas; what we will > > have is just another homogeneous country that loses its edge as it > > slips into a socialistic quagmire. > > > What we are doing is losing that very identity that made the USA the > > great and desired example it once was.
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
