Your government is supporting and acclaiming Socialism, --- it's true ... there are too many in our government 'acclaiming' socialism we know who they are ... and know they must be eliminated asap by any means necessary
you have sold weapons to your enemies, --- some people in the US government have sold weapons to our enemies ... many have been charged with the crime and some have been found guilty ... we know who they are and they must be eliminated asap by any means necessary you have subverted legally seated governments, --- the US interventionist policy, especially in the middle east, has been hijacked by israel's interests it must end asap by any means necessary bribery and blackmail are ways of life in Washington, --- that's why we must eliminate israel's AIPAC and all other foreign lobbies from DC the stranglehold that have on our politicians in DC must be broken asap by any means necessary you have almost 200 foreign empire building military bases, --- the interventionist policy must end asap by any means necessary a strong America can keep the savages away from the door at least, unlike you, they have done nothing to support al quaida, --- no, they sell China and other undesirables the planes, rockets and other weapon technology that our politicians GIVE them. it's way past time to replace these traitors by any means necessary did not fund its beginnings, --- oh, like when the jews funded the russian revolution that led to deaths of 3 times the number of jews killed by germans? did not support placing a new sharia based governments in Iraq and Libya, they do not build Mosques on foreign land while claiming separation of church and state... ---- funny ... as israel is a religious state for jews that they've brought their nasty war with the muzzies to our shores is unforgivable They learned from you, before expelling the student maybe the faculty should be cleaned up....... ---- and maybe the jews should go home and stay out of America we don't want socialistic parasites in our nation On Aug 29, 5:03 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > Explain to me just what on your list is not also inversely true?? Your > government is supporting and acclaiming Socialism, you have sold weapons to > your enemies, you have subverted legally seated governments, bribery and > blackmail are ways of life in Washington, you have almost 200 foreign empire > building military bases, > > at least, unlike you, they have done nothing to support al quaida, did not > fund its beginnings, did not support placing a new sharia based governments > in Iraq and Libya, they do not build Mosques on foreign land while claiming > separation of church and state... > > They learned from you, before expelling the student maybe the faculty should > be cleaned up....... > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:51 PM, plainolamerican > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > As to Israel... I do wholeheartedly support them > > --- > > why? > > > they promote socialism and open borders in the USA, they have killed > > our soldiers, spied on our government, and illegally sold our > > technology to our enemies and bribed our politicians > > > let me guess why: > > - their god is the god of xians > > - they are supposedly a democracy > > - they are enemies of the muzzies > > - they claim to be an ally > > > I would never > > support them by selling weapons (by front or back channels) to their > > obvious enemies. Yet the US does just that.... > > --- > > hell, they provided the weapons that the US used to exchange for US > > hostages > > it's a violation of US law to negotiate with hostage takers and > > terrorists, yet israel does the same thing > > > some will never forget that israel has pulled the US into the middle > > east cluster-fuck > > it's time to change policies and the relationship with the jews > > choose sides carefully > > > On Aug 28, 1:06 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The problem is not non-interventionists it is the absolute lack of a > > > clear and permanent definition of what should qualify the need for an > > > intervention. If the premise of a "clear and present danger" were to > > > be used it would have no detractors and we never would have been > > > involved in any war, conflict or police action since WW2. History > > > proves that none of these actions has solved anything. > > > > As to Israel... I do wholeheartedly support them, I would never > > > support them by selling weapons (by front or back channels) to their > > > obvious enemies. Yet the US does just that.... The best way to win at > > > war is to NOT play. > > > > Most US oil comes from the new world, Saudi Arabia (tell me why we > > > sell them weapons again) and Nigeria. If there is a problem to be > > > solved in the mid-East let those most affected do the solving.... > > > Europe. > > > > On Aug 28, 9:40 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > *Is Ron Paul A Useful Idiot?* > > > > ** > >http://bigpeace.com/smitsotakis/2011/08/27/is-ron-paul-a-useful-idiot/ > > > > > Over at the American Spectator, the great Jeffrey Lord writes that > > “almost > > > > to a person … prominent pre-Ron Paul non-interventionist “Paulist” > > > > politicians of the 20th century were overwhelmingly not conservatives > > at > > > > all. They were men of the left. The far left.” > > > > > From three-time Democratic presidential nominee and Woodrow Wilson > > Secretary > > > > of State William Jennings Bryan to powerful Montana Democratic Senator > > > > Burton K. Wheeler to *FDR’s ex-vice presidential nominee Henry Wallace* > > to > > > > the 1968 anti-war presidential candidacy of Minnesota Democratic > > Senator > > > > Eugene McCarthy to 1972 Democratic presidential nominee (and *Henry > > Wallace > > > > delegate in 1948*) George McGovern, non-interventionists have held > > prominent > > > > positions in the American Left that was and is the Democratic > > > > Party.(emphasis added) > > > > > What was unique about Wallace’s 1948 Progressive Party campaign was how > > it > > > > was completely controlled by the secret Communist Party agents that > > > > surrounded Wallace, despite the fact that he was not a Communist. > > Lillian > > > > Hellman, who despite her denials was indeed a secret member of the > > Communist > > > > Party, admitted as much in her 1976 book *Scoundrel Time*: > > > > > During the early autumn of 1948, four or five of us [leaders of the > > > > Progressive Party campaign] were eating lunch together on the day of a > > large > > > > evening rally. When lunch was finished Wallace suggested that he and I > > take > > > > a walk. … When we had walked for a while, he asked me if it was true > > that > > > > many of the people, the important people, in the Progressive Party were > > > > Communists. It was such a surprising question that I laughed and said > > most > > > > certainly it was true. > > > > He said, “Then it is true, what they’re saying?” > > > > “Yes,” I said. “I thought you must have known that. The hard, dirty > > work in > > > > the office is done by them and a good deal of the bad advice you’re > > getting > > > > is given by the higher-ups. I don’t think they mean any harm; they’re > > > > stubborn men.” > > > > “I see,” he said, and that was that. > > > > > What is clear is that the Communists – who, of course, did mean harm – > > were > > > > able to drive the campaign of a non-Communist due to their *influence*. > > And > > > > Wallace knew it, despite his public denials. As Arthur Herman pointed > > out in > > > > *National Review* “when Hubert Humphrey complained about the prominent > > role > > > > Communists were playing in the election, Wallace blithely told him to > > go > > > > talk to the Russian embassy — it had more influence over his campaign > > > > officials than he did.” > > > > > So if it can happen to Henry Wallace, why can’t it happen to his > > Republican > > > > mirror, Ron Paul? On Thursday, Mark Levin had Jeffrey Lord on his show > > to > > > > talk about his article (listen to it here, here and here), where they > > > > discussed all the crackpots and “neo-confederates” that surround Ron > > Paul in > > > > his inner circle. What would a group like think of, say, Israel? > > > > > Well, on his own website, we find that: “On January 9, [2009] Ron Paul > > > > addressed Congress to voice his opposition to a House resolution > > expressing > > > > strong support for Israel in its invasion of Gaza, and branding Hamas > > as a > > > > terrorist organization.” It goes on to proudly highlight that he went > > on > > > > Press TV (the Iranian state propaganda channel) and Russia Today > > (KGB-TV > > > > basically, with it’s paid agents promoting and even doing fund-raising > > for > > > > Ron Paul). > > > > > Anyone who has spent time around his supporters know what they think of > > > > Israel, and likely had to hear the anti-Semitic conspiracy theories > > that are > > > > so widespread in his little cult. What is their influence? Why doesn’t > > he > > > > denounce them? Also, such a denunciation would have a devastating > > impact > > > > both the national and international crackpot communities that sustain > > > > anti-Americanism, as the great Cold War era defector and former KGB > > General > > > > turned American Patriot Ion Mihai Pacepa explained. Wouldn’t that be in > > our > > > > national interest, Dr. Paul? > > > > > I await my hate mail. > > > > > RonPaul.Hippie..jpg > > > > 185KViewDownload > > > -- > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > -- > *Mark M. Kahle H.* > * > * > * > * -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
