if you end the state monopoly and let anyone, not just USPS, deliver
non-urgent first class mail,
---
there's not a monopoly
anyone can start a mail delivery company
all you need is your own designated mailbox for your customers

On Sep 9, 10:40 am, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote:
> you people really are concrete bound unthinking apes
>
> if you end the state monopoly and let anyone, not just USPS, deliver
> non-urgent first class mail, FedEx and UPS will not be the only ones to get
> the business
>
> Anyone, including groups of unemployed people, could legally start a local
> company and offer to pick up and deliver mail locally or regionally.  It
> would not even require much capital
>
> You foolish idiot statists have been keeping poor people from going into
> this and many other businesses for decades
>
> This is why you, or at least your masters, must be sent to the guillotine
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:18 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> > **
> > *The USPS is NOT losing money. It is the way they are forced to play with
> > the books.*
> > *I am telling you FED X and UPS want the business. The PR is to diss the
> > service and claim the private sector could do better. tth*
> > *If you think it sux now, just  wait until it is privately managed.*
> >  In a message dated 9/9/2011 11:13:22 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> > [email protected] writes:
>
> > Treasonous, scum bag Republicans claim that the USPS having a shortfall
> > (due to GOP legislation) of over a Billion dollars means it has to go, even
> > though it is a Constitutionally mandated service to America, yet...
>
> > ...GW Bush gave Bank of America *TWENTY BILLION* taxpayer dollars to bail
> > them out of hard times, and guaranteed (backstopped) *118-Billion* dollars
> > worth of crap assets and stocks for them to make it easy for Bank of America
> > to fuck over the American people
> >http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/industries/finance/bofa-shar...
> > and consider just how much we handed to Bank of America alone is the
> > equivalent of *("A tightly packed stack of new $100 dollar bills totaling
> > a billion dollars would be 4,000 feet high or about three Sears Tower
> > buildings stacked one on top of each other.*"
> >http://www.letterstotheeditor.com/2009/09/22/how-much-is-a-billion-do...)  ,
> > or in other words, in a more common denomination of a 20.00 dollar bill,
> > President Bush handed to Bank of America a stack of 100.00 taxpayer bills
> > over Seveny Six Miles High, not just higher than the earths atmosphere, but
> > well out into space...  to keep BofA going, and how do they repay America?
>
> > They repay America by helping the Republicans talking point of "no Jobs" by
> > adding 40,000 to the unemployment rolls.  Republicans are doing everything
> > possible to make sure as many Americans as possible are out of work come the
> > next election.  They are BANKING on it.
>
> > Sarge
>
> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:25 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> **
>
> >> [image:http://www.reuters.com/] <http://www.reuters.com/>
>
> >> Bank of America Corp officials have discussed slashing roughly 40,000 jobs
> >> during the first wave of a restructuring, the Wall Street Journal said,
> >> citing people familiar with the plans.
>
> >> The number of job cuts are not final and could change. The restructuring
> >> aims to reduce the bank's workforce of 280,000 over a period of years, the
> >> Journal said.
>
> >> BofA could not immediately be reached for comment by Reuters outside
> >> regular U.S. business hours.
>
> >> The Journal said BofA executives met Thursday at Charlotte, North
> >> Carolina, where the bank is headquartered, and will gather again Friday to
> >> make final decisions on the reductions, putting the finishing touches on
> >> five months of work.
>
> >> Investors are pressing BofA to improve its performance after it lost money
> >> in four of the last six quarters and its stock has fallen by half this 
> >> year.
>
> >> The Journal said the proposed job cuts may exceed BofA's last big cutback
> >> in 2008 when it called for 30,000 to 35,000 job cuts over three years. That
> >> move was triggered by an economic slowdown and the planned takeover of
> >> securities firm Merrill Lynch & Co.
> >>  Earlier this month, the Charlotte Observer reported that BofA executives
> >> were discussing plans to potentially shed 25,000 to 30,000 jobs over the
> >> next several years.
>
> >> BofA had earlier planned to cut 3,500 jobs, its Chief Executive Brian
> >> Moynihan had said in a memo to staff on August 18, as it tries to come to
> >> grips with $1 trillion of problem home mortgages.
>
> >> BofA announced a far-reaching reorganization of its senior management team
> >> on Tuesday, which included the departure of consumer bank chief Joe Price
> >> and wealth management head Sallie Krawcheck.
>
> >> Banks are shedding jobs worldwide as stricter regulations and a tough
> >> second quarter for trading income take their toll on investment banking
> >> units in particular.
>
> >> More than 70,000 staff cuts have been announced this year or are reported
> >> to be in the works at U.S. and European banks, some of them to be lost over
> >> three or four year programs.
>
> >> Bill
>
> >> "Statistics are no substitute for judgement"
>
> >>  In a message dated 9/9/2011 9:10:49 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> >> [email protected] writes:
>
> >> Daylight Time

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to