"Another factor here is that
statists view the federal government as a daddy or a god, one that
provides them with retirement, healthcare, education, food, jobs,
training, and all sorts of grants, not to mention protecting them from
drug dealers, profit-seekers, entrepreneurs, the rich, speculators, big
oil, corporations, greed, illegal aliens, communists, terrorists, and
other such dangers.
"Therefore, statists really resent it when someone criticizes their
daddy or their god, much as a child resents it when one of his friends
criticizes the child’s daddy. “You can’t say that about my daddy! Take it
back!” is the standard reaction among the statist child-adult upon
hearing libertarian criticism of the federal government."
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Blaming America
by Jacob G. Hornberger
One of the most fascinating aspects of the post-9/11 debate has been the
“Blame America” phenomenon. Whenever libertarians have pointed to the
role that U.S. foreign policy played in producing the anger and rage that
ultimately manifested itself with terrorist retaliation on 9/11, statists
have responded, “Oh, so you’re blaming America for the attacks.”
Here at The Future of Freedom Foundation, we experienced this phenomenon
first-hand immediately after the 9/11 attacks. A couple of weeks after
9/11, I wrote an article entitled,
“Is This the Wrong Time
to Question Foreign Policy?” We have never been inundated with more
nasty emails as we were then, with virtually all of them attacking us for
“blaming America” for the attacks.
The phenomenon manifested itself 4 years ago during the first GOP
presidential debate. Ron Paul pointed out that the 9/11 terrorists came
over here to kill us because the U.S. government was over there killing
them. Immediately, Rudy Guliani pounced, criticizing Paul for blaming
America for the attacks.
Most recently, Rick Santorum issued the same sort of attack against Paul
based on Paul’s contention in his weekly column that the 10-year deadly
occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan were leaving America vulnerable to a
permanent threat of terrorist retaliation. Santorum suggested that Paul
was blaming America.
It’s hard to imagine anything so ridiculous. Why is it that these people
automatically jump to the conclusion that when one blames the federal
government for the consequences resulting from its bad policies, he is,
automatically, blaming America for such consequences?
One reason is the collectivist mindset of statists. In their minds, the
federal government and the country are conflated into one big entity.
Imagine a great big bee hive. The hive is the federal government, with
the structure of the hive consisting of the military and the CIA. All of
us in the private sector are the drones, who exist to serve the
government -- the greater good -- society -- the collective.
So, given that mindset of the statist, it makes sense that he would
conclude that a person who condemns the wrongful actions of the
government is condemning his country. For him, it’s just one big hive,
with the national-security state providing the framework and with the
maintenance of the welfare state being the goal of the hive.
Another factor here is that statists view the federal government as a
daddy or a god, one that provides them with retirement, healthcare,
education, food, jobs, training, and all sorts of grants, not to mention
protecting them from drug dealers, profit-seekers, entrepreneurs, the
rich, speculators, big oil, corporations, greed, illegal aliens,
communists, terrorists, and other such dangers.
Therefore, statists really resent it when someone criticizes their daddy
or their god, much as a child resents it when one of his friends
criticizes the child’s daddy. “You can’t say that about my daddy! Take it
back!” is the standard reaction among the statist child-adult upon
hearing libertarian criticism of the federal government.
Finally, there’s the patriotism factor. Statists have the warped concept
of patriotism that has long characterized European countries -- the one
in which the citizen is expected to support his government, especially in
time of crisis or war, regardless of whether the government is in the
right or not. In fact, during such times the citizen is not even expected
to make that determination, according to the statist concept of
patriotism. His mindset is expected to be, “My government, right or
wrong” or, even better, “My government, never wrong, at least not in
foreign affairs.”
A good example, of course, is World War II, when German citizens came to
the support of their government even though their government was in the
wrong. Like statists here, most German citizens didn’t bother making that
determination. It had been inculcated in them, especially in German
public schools, that the good citizen and the good patriot come to the
support of their government, especially during crisis or war.
That’s why some statists have no reservations is saying that the German
people who supported their government during World War II were genuine
patriots and that the
White Rose Germans
were bad people for taking a principled stand against their government in
the midst of war.
Thus, libertarians, needless to say, view patriotism in an entirely
different way from statists. We view patriotism in the way that the
signers of the Declaration of Independence viewed it. Contrary to popular
opinion, those signers were not great Americans but rather great
Englishmen. They were as much English citizens as you and I are American
citizens.
The revolutionaries in 1776 were willing to stand up against their own
government because their government was doing bad things and refused to
stop doing such bad things. Libertarians consider those revolutionaries
to have been the real patriots because they had the courage to take a
stand against the wrongdoing of their own government. Statists, on the
other hand, side with those who considered Washington, Jefferson,
Madison, and the others as traitors or bad people for refusing to support
their government in time of crisis or war.
An interesting question is whether American statists are inherently
incapable of recognizing that the federal government and the private
sector are not one and the same thing and that the real patriot is the
person who is unafraid to take a principled stand against the wrongdoing
of his government. My feeling is that many of them are incorrigible but
that some of them are still able to break free of the statist mindset
that holds them in its grip.
We libertarians must just continue doing what we’re doing standing
against government wrongdoing, not only because it’s the right thing to
do but also because it’s the best chance we have to protect our country
from the consequences of the federal government’s bad policies, both
foreign and domestic.
http://www.fff.org/blog/jghblog2011-09-21.asp
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
