---------
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07/18/cern_cosmic_ray_gag/ Original URL: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07/18/cern_cosmic_ray_gag/ CERN 'gags' physicists in cosmic ray climate experiment What do these results mean? Not allowed to tell you By Andrew Orlowski ([email protected]) Posted in Science, 18th July 2011 12:01 GMT Free whitepaper – Energy Efficient Cooling for Data Centers The chief of the world's leading physics lab at CERN in Geneva has prohibited scientists from drawing conclusions from a major experiment. The CLOUD ("Cosmics Leaving Outdoor Droplets") experiment examines the role that energetic particles from deep space play in cloud formation. CLOUD uses CERN's proton synchrotron to examine nucleation. CERN Director General Rolf-Dieter Heuer told [1] Welt Online that the scientists should refrain from drawing conclusions from the latest experiment. "I have asked the colleagues to present the results clearly, but not to interpret them," reports veteran science editor Nigel Calder on his blog [2]. Why? Because, Heuer says, "That would go immediately into the highly political arena of the climate change debate. One has to make clear that cosmic radiation is only one of many parameters." 12m muons pass through your body every 24 hours The unusual "gagging order" could have been issued because the results of CLOUD are really, really boring, muses Calder. Or, it could be that the experiment invites a politically unacceptable hypothesis on climate. The CLOUD experiment builds on earlier experiments by Danish physicist Henrik Svensmark, who demonstrated that cosmic rays provide a seed for clouds. Tiny changes in the earth's cloud cover could account for variations in temperature of several degrees. The amount of Ultra Fine Condensation Nuclei (UFCN) material depends on the quantity of the background drizzle of rays, which varies depending on the strength of the sun's magnetic field and the strength of the Earth's magnetic field. Close correlation between cosmic ray penetration and temperature But how much? Speaking at a private event attended by El Reg earlier this year, Svensmark, who has nothing to do with CLOUD, wouldn't be drawn. He said he thought [3] it was one of four significant factors: man-made factors, volcanoes, a "regime shift" in the mid-'70s, and cosmic rays. The quantity of cosmic rays therefore has an influence on climate, but this isn't factored into the IPCC's "consensus" science at all. According to Calder: "CERN has joined a long line of lesser institutions obliged to remain politically correct about the man-made global warming hypothesis. It's OK to enter 'the highly political arena of the climate change debate' provided your results endorse man-made warming, but not if they support Svensmark's heresy that the Sun alters the climate by influencing the cosmic ray influx and cloud formation." Let's hope he's been misquoted. The precedents aren't happy [4]. ® Links • http://www.welt.de/wissenschaft/article13488331/Wie-Illuminati-den-Cern-Forschern-geholfen-hat.html • https://calderup.wordpress.com/2011/07/17/%E2%80%9Cno-you-mustnt-say-what-it-means%E2%80%9D/ • http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/13/downing_cambridge_climate_conference/page3.html • http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Lysenkoism -- Warm Regards DOC ___________________ ~ ~ (_____(*)___________} } } __._,_.___ Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1) Recent Activity: Visit Your Group Report any problems, suggestions or abuse to [email protected] <http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/yg/logo/us.gif> Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use . < http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=2420737/grpspId=1705303292/msgId=242672/stime=1311346660/nc1=1/nc2=2/nc3=3 > __,_._,___ -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
