Half of congress is dem On Oct 10, 1:54 pm, studio <[email protected]> wrote: > The latest scam is a Bill to Congress by Obama that would supposedly > stop discrimination by employers not hiring anyone out of work. > > #1. It would never pass in a Republican held Congress. > #2. Employers are never going to state that's the reason they won't > hire you. > #3. They won't catch anyone, and is another wasteful spending measure. > > It's all politically motivated with no basis in logic. > i.e. I've been out of work for 6 years now; I applied for a job that > wanted 5 months experience and wrote them I had 35 times that > experience and (knowing they wouldn't hire me) would consider dumbing > myself down for the position. > > So what unemployed people need to do (and feel free to pass this on), > is create their own "current" work history. > > i.e. I made my g/f (wife, mother, sister, friend, who ever can help > you with this) assistant human resource manager for a known small > legitimate company. Chances are the potential employer will have no > idea who the Human Resources Manger is there. > If any employers want to call her (some may, some won't), she will > verify I am indeed gainfully employed by her company with no issues. > > In this time of political lies and deception by both major political > parties, you have to do what they do; fabricate and lie. > > Obama knew *exactly* what the unemployment situation was when he came > into office. > But what did he do? > Instead of address the problem from the start, he gave Health Care > plan the priority (a plan that doesn't kick in for another 3 years > anyway!), because when people are employed, they don't need his health > care plan. > So he waited, and waited, and waited to address employment... now > making it a campaign issue, and not an actual job creating plan. > All the while neither major political parties had zero plans to > stimulate the real economy and create jobs. > > Why do you think Bush Jr. came up with a $700 billion bailout for Wall > Street? And Obama continued the bailouts with half the money Bush Jr. > didn't spend on them? > Because both major political parties love the huge amounts of money > that gets kicked back to them in the form of political campaign > donations. > Wall Street simply asks the politicians; which political party will > give me the best deal for my donations? > > And you wonder why your bank fees go up? > Don't be so ignorant. > > Wall Street kick-back donations far out-weigh donations given to them > by all grass-roots ordinary people. > Combine that with unions, big oil, telecoms, law firms, and other big > business interests... and the common people have zero chance of having > any of their real concerns addressed. > > By the people, for the people? > If by "people" you mean "big business", then yes. > Otherwise it's just meaningless words on a very old wrinkly piece of > paper. > Remember; the Supreme Court validated that money donated by big > business is speech. > That simply means anything you have to say about anything is > worthless. > > And all of this because "the people" can't hold the leaders > accountable for what a average 3rd grader is expected to accomplish in > math class.
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
