----------



http://www.renegadeeconomist.com/blog/producers-vs.-predators.html

excerpt:

The producer predator divide has always split capitalism. As it pushes
society to its logical conclusion populist politicians are trying to cash in
– can they really address the root problem?

Ed Milliband's conference speech in Liverpool was typical of any populist
career politician. The central theme was "I'm different so you can trust me
with the big economic decisions".

Mr Milliband singled out the producer / predator divide as the key problem
in British business: "Predators are just interested in the fast buck, taking
what they can out of the business.... One firm always destined to be a
predator and another to be a producer....Look at what a private equity firm
did to the Southern Cross care home". 'Granny farming' - as the private
equity boys call it - has been a sacred cash cow of their predatory business
model for decades but why?


The answer is very simple: the regressive British tax system actively
encourages the rent seeking predator whilst punishing the value adding
producer. A predator can be defined as somebody who is constantly looking
for what's called "Economic Rent". Economic Rent is the (unspoken) 'cream of
the deal' i.e. abnormal returns. It's the excess money you earn once your
initial investment has paid off. This excess is not infinite so to prevent
these unsustainable royalties blowing up in their face rent-seekers have to
dump the investment when they've almost milked it dry. That way someone else
has to pick up the pieces - enter the taxpayer.

Is this divide too simplistic?

But who are the producers and is this divide too simplistic? Firstly the
divide is simple and one can (and will) argue that some corporations are
both producers and predators simultaneously. An organisation that does both
would add value by creating goods or services but then extract value through
say a property portfolio that privatises the economic rent created by the
community. This schizophrenic practice straddles the divide and worryingly
remains socially acceptable.

A producer is someone who uses their labour to add value. Producers often
have their own successful value adding business so do not need to emulate
the predators. Producers believe everyone can be rich in a meaningful sense
whereas the predators believe only a few can be really rich. The oldest
conflict in human history is the predators vs. the producers.

Predators manipulate the social and political landscape to derive the
economic rent because predators need producers not vice versa. By kowtowing
to the predators policymakers in The West have re-shaped taxes to help the
rent seekers. This has turned economic democracy into financial oligarchy to
which politicians now turn for funding. It has polarized society between the
predators - those who live off the rent and finance and the producers – who
live off only what they can produce.

The game's up...

The upper echelons of the predator 'class' do not do anything productive at
all. They surround themselves with a coterie of 'professionals' that
co-ordinate profit taking, tax gathering, and rent collection. The Inland
Revenue, lawyers, judiciary, parliament and bureaucrats all live off rental
spoils. To make this swindle palatable moral leaders (historically the
church) have overseen and legitimised the process claiming it is the best
possible arrangement for society to 'progress'.


The problem now is twofold: 1) The balance has shifted so dramatically
toward the Predators that the game is now clear to see 2) People today are
wiser, less likely to accept that this is God's wish.


Mr Milliband told his party "I'm not Tony Blair" and the conference booed
the name of the most successful leader in labour's history – but why?
Because Blair is a predator par excellence and although the crowd couldn't
put their finger on it – intuitively he's morally offensive to Labour Party
history. After presiding over the biggest housing bubble in British history
Blair's next rent seeking expedition was Iraq. After Downing Street almost
all of the money Blair has earned has been through rent seeking – legal or
not.

Incidentally house holders are also complicit in this system as they are
allowed to privatise the unearned increment that arises in their property
value when the community comes together and creates a surplus of economic
rent.

Fashionably Ignorant

Stephen Schwarzman understands the economic rent mechanism intimately but
for self preservation any predator has to remain fashionably ignorant. He is
the Blackstone CEO who took the capital out of Southern Cross by selling off
the homes and forcing the company to rent the properties from another
company. Tax adverse Schwarzman* bought Southern Cross in 2004 for
£162million and flipped it three years later for well over four times the
price he paid. If it goes bust the taxpayer will pay £600million a year to
re-house the 31,000 'economic units'. Predatory rentier capitalism for
Schwarzman and socialism for everyone else – still cool with that?

The question is how do we get out of this debt backed mess? Very simple –
reshape the tax system to socialise economic rent to pay for public
services, infrastructure and pensions. That way you can have man on the
street keep what he earns and put a secure fence around UK assets that will
deter the predators. Will Mr Milliband, Labour or in fact any political
party do any of this? Not a chance. But it's good to understand the
mechanism and solution. Maybe one day we will make elected leaders enforce
such a brilliantly simple tax code – only of course if we lose that self
defeating obsession with house prices.

__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic
Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:

New Members 2

Visit Your Group
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get
the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
.
__,_._,___

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to