**

 Forget Fingerprints...I need your Faceprint.... ****

** **

The FBI by mid-January will activate a nationwide facial recognition service
in select states that will allow local police to identify unknown subjects
in photos, bureau officials told Nextgov.****

The federal government is embarking on a multiyear, $1 billion dollar
overhaul of the FBI's existing fingerprint database to more quickly and
accurately identify suspects, partly through applying other biometric
markers, such as iris scans and voice recordings.****

Often law enforcement authorities will "have a photo of a person and for
whatever reason they just don't know who it is [but they know] this is
clearly the missing link to our case," said Nick Megna, a unit chief at the
FBI's criminal justice information services division. The new facial
recognition service can help provide that missing link by retrieving a list
of mug shots ranked in order of similarity to the features of the subject in
the photo.****

Today, an agent would have to already know the name of an individual to pull
up the suspect's mug shot from among the 10 million shots stored in the
bureau's existing Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System.***
*

Using the new Next-Generation Identification system that is under
development, law enforcement analysts will be able to upload a photo of an
unknown person; choose a desired number of results from two to 50 mug shots;
and, within 15 minutes, receive identified mugs to inspect for potential
matches. Users typically will request 20 candidates, Megna said. The service
does not provide a direct match.****

Michigan, Washington, Florida and North Carolina will participate in a test
of the new search tool this winter before it is offered to criminal justice
professionals across the country in 2014 as part of NGI. The project, which
was awarded to Lockheed Martin Corp. in 2008, already has upgraded the FBI's
fingerprint matching service.****

Local authorities have the choice to file mug shots with the FBI as part of
the booking process. The bureau expects its collection of shots to rival its
repository of 70 million fingerprints once more officers are aware of the
facial search's capabilities.****

Thomas E. Bush III, who helped develop NGI's system requirements when he
served as assistant director of the CJIS division between 2005 and 2009,
said, "The idea was to be able to plug and play with these identifiers and
biometrics." Law enforcement personnel saw value in facial recognition and
the technology was maturing, said the 33-year FBI veteran who now serves as
a private consultant.****

NGI's incremental construction seems to align with the White House's push to
deploy new information technology in phases so features can be scrapped if
they don't meet expectations or run over budget.****

But immigrant rights groups have raised concerns that the Homeland Security
Department, which exchanges digital prints with the FBI, will abuse the new
facial recognition component. Currently, a controversial DHS immigrant
fingerprinting program called Secure Communities runs FBI prints from booked
offenders against the department's IDENT biometric database to check whether
they are in the country illegally. Homeland Security officials say they
extradite only the most dangerous aliens, including convicted murderers and
rapists. But critics say the FBI-DHS print swapping ensnares as many
foreigners as possible, including those whose charges are minor or are
ultimately dismissed.****

Megna said Homeland Security is not part of the facial recognition pilot.
But, Bush said in the future NGI's data, including the photos, will be
accessible by Homeland Security's IDENT. ****

The planned addition of facial searches worries Sunita Patel, a staff
attorney with the Center for Constitutional Rights, who said, "Any database
of personal identity information is bound to have mistakes. And with the
most personal immutable traits like our facial features and fingerprints,
the public can't afford a mistake."****

In addition, Patel said she is concerned about the involvement of local
police in information sharing for federal immigration enforcement purposes.*
***

"The federal government is using local cops to create a massive surveillance
system," she said. ****

Bush said, "We do have the capability to search against each other's
systems," but added, "if you don't come to the attention of law enforcement
you don't have anything to fear from these systems."****

Other civil liberties advocates questioned whether the facial recognition
application would retrieve mug shots of those who have simply been arrested.
****

"It might be appropriate to have nonconvicted people out of that system,"
said Jim Harper, director of information policy at the libertarian Cato
Institute. FBI officials declined to comment on the recommendation.****

Harper also noted large-scale searches may generate a lot of false
positives, or incorrect matches. Facial recognition "is more accurate with a
Google or a Facebook, because they will have anywhere from a half-dozen to a
dozen pictures of an individual, whereas I imagine the FBI has one or two
mug shots," he said.****

FBI officials would not disclose the name of the search product or the
vendor, but said they gained insights on the technique's accuracy by
studying research from the National Institute of Standards and Technology.**
**

In responding to concerns about the creation of a Big Brother database for
tracking innocent Americans, Megna said the system will not alter the FBI's
authorities or the way it conducts business. "This doesn't change or create
any new exchanges of data," he said. "It only provides [law enforcement]
with a new service to determine what photos are of interest to them."****

In 2008, the FBI released a privacy impact assessment summarizing its
appraisal of controls in place to ensure compliance with federal privacy
regulations. Megna said that, during meetings with the CJIS Advisory Policy
Board and the National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact Council, "we
haven't gotten a whole lot of pushback on the photo capability."****

The FBI has an elaborate system of checks and balances to guard
fingerprints, palm prints, mug shots and all manner of criminal history
data, he said.****

"This is not something where we want to collect a bunch of surveillance
film" and enter it in the system, Megna said. "That would be useless to us.*
***

It would be useless to our users." ****

http://www.nextgov.com/nextgov/ng_20111007_6100.php?oref=rss ****

** **

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to