----------
excerpt: "Occupy Wall Street has come under fire from some libertarians, on the grounds that it's relatively silent about the role of big government, and its proposed remedies lean heavily toward increased government intervention. But it's quite understandable that many in the Occupy movement position themselves in opposition to the "free market" and in favor of government intervention. After all, ever since they were born they've heard loathsome cretins like Dick Armey, Tom Delay, along with the usual suspects on CNBC and the WSJ editorial staff, defend corporate capitalism as we know it and the unbelievable concentration of wealth and power as the result of "our free market system." Every time you look at a debate on economic policy, the liberal is saying the free market can't be left to itself because the inevitable result is polarization of wealth and corporate tyranny. And the conservative is saying corporate tyranny and polarization of wealth are good things, and that government should stay out of it. All the things the Occupiers are rightfully against, like the plutocratic oligarchy and abusive corporate power, they've seen defended — or attacked — in terms of "our free enterprise system." If I thought the free market meant what Dick Armey said it was, I'd hate it too." read more: http://c4ss.org/content/8630 __._,_.___ Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1) Recent Activity: New Members 2 Visit Your Group MARKETPLACE Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now. Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use . __,_._,___ -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
